Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 1580


AURELIEN DJIAN
HUSSERL ET L’HORIZON COMME PROBLEME. UNE CONTRIBUTION A L’HISTOIRE DE LA PHENOMENOLOGIE
Lille: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 2021. ISBN-102757433296

Title in the language of publication: РЕЦЕНЗИЯ НА КНИГУ ОРЕЛЬЕНА ДЖИАНА
HUSSERL ET L’HORIZON COMME PROBLÈME. UNE CONTRIBUTION A L’HISTOIRE DE LA PHENOMENOLOGIE
Lille: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 2021. ISBN-102757433296
Author: KIRILL YAKOVLEV
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 466-482
Language: Russian
Document type: Review
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-466-482 PDF (Downloads: 1857)

Abstract
In his book, Aurelien Djian investigates the history of the concept of horizon in the evolution of Husserl’s thought. Addressing the most fundamental concerns of phenomenology, Djian redefines the horizon considering themes such as coherence of experience, the reality of the world, and motivation. He suggests an approach to exploring the horizon grounded in a detailed analysis of Thing and Space lectures. A significant conclusion of Djians’s book is that the origin of the horizon should not be attributed to Ideas I, but to these lectures. This discovery is not only of historical significance, but also opens up a new perspective on relations between the world, the incompleteness of external experience, and the fluidity of attention. Djian denies Saulius Geniusas’ interpretation of “halo” and “background” as psychological opposites of the horizon, which functions in the domain of ontology. These phenomena are given as elements of experience temporarily left by attention, connected with actual ones. The consciousness of unfulfilled potentialities of experience ensures the coherence of experience, making the transition from actual to potential seamless. This paper covers Djian’s conclusions and part of his work that goes beyond the content of the book. We also try to contextualize Djian’s research and show the history of studies of the horizon in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl.

Keywords
horizon, motivation, halo, style, hermeneutic phenomenology, Edmund Husserl, Saulius Geniusas.

References

  • Belousov, M. (2021). On the Question of Evidence in Husserl’s Phenomenology: The Given and the Horizon. Filosofskii zhurnal, 14 (2), 66-81. (In Russian)
  • Belousov, M. (2015). On the Problem of Meaning in Husserl’s Phenomenology: The Concept of Final Fulfillment in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii, 4, 165-204. Moscow: RGGU Publ. (In Russian)
  • Biemel, W. (2018). W. Biemel’s Introduction to the Second Volume of “Husserliana” . Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Gumanitarnaja Akademija Publ. (In Russian)
  • Djian, A., & Majolino, C. (2018). What ‘Phenomenon’ for Hermeneutics? Remarks on the Hermeneutical Vocation of Phenomenology. In Paul Fairfield & Saulius Geniusas (Eds.), Hermeneutics and Phenomenology: Figures and Themes (48-64). London, Oxford, NY: Bloomsbury.
  • Djian, A. (2017). L’horizon comme problème. Contribution à une histoire plurielle de la phénoménologie. Lille: Université Charles de Gaulle — Lille III.
  • Djian, A. (2021). Husserl et l’horizon comme problème — Une contribution à l’histoire de la phénoménologie. Lille: Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
  • Fazakas, I., & Gozé, T. (2020). The Promise of the World: Towards a Transcendental History of Trust. Husserl Studies, 36 (2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-020-09264-9
  • Geniusas, S. (2012). The Origins of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Hopp, W. (2010). How to Think about Nonconceptual Content. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, X (1), 1–24.
  • Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution (Hua IV). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1973). Ding und Raum (Hua XVI). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1974). Formale und Transzendentale Logik: Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft (Hua XVII). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (2009). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Vol. I. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (2010). Cartesian Meditations. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (2018). The Idea of Phenomenoogy. Five Lectures. Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Gumanitarnaja Akademija Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M. (2003). Being and Time. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt Publ. (In Russian)
  • Kuhn, H. (2013). The Phenomenological Concept of “Horizon”. In Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl (106-123). Harvard University Press.
  • Smith, D. W., & McIntyre, R. (1982). Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Tengelyi, L. (2007). Erfahrung und Audruck. Phänomenologie im Umbruch bei Husserl und seinen Nachfolgern. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Tengelyi, L. (2012). New Phenomenology in France. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50, 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00100.x
  • Walsh, P. J. (2017). Motivation and Horizon: Phenomenal Intentionality in Husserl. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 94 (3), 410-435. https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-09403007
  • Welton, D. (1983). The Origins of Meaning: A Critical Study of the Thresholds of Husserlian Phenomenology. Boston: Kluwer.
  • Yampolskaya, A. (2013). Phenomenology in Germany and France: Problems of the Method. Rus. Ed. Moscow: RGGU Publ. (In Russian)
  • Yoshimi, J. (2016). Husserlian Phenomenology: A Unifying Interpretation. Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26698-5

Article/Publication Details
Views: 1474


VASILI SESEMAN’S TRANSCENDENTAL THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE: BETWEEN PHENOMENOLOGY AND NEO-KANTIANISM

Title in the language of publication: ТРАНСЦЕНДЕНТАЛЬНАЯ ТЕОРИЯ ПОЗНАНИЯ ВАСИЛИЯ СЕЗЕМАНА: МЕЖДУ ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЕЙ И НЕОКАНТИАНСТВОМ
Author: ANNA SHIYAN
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 170-189
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-170-189 PDF (Downloads: 1906)

Abstract
The article considers the theory of cognition of the Russian and Soviet philosopher Vasily Seseman (1884-1963) in its relation to the main philosophical orientations in early 20th-century: phenomenology, neokantianism, and intuitionism. Seseman’s theory of cognition is interesting today because, following the tradition of neo-Kantianism, it largely shares the principles and methods of phenomenology, poses epistemological problems that were not explicitly formulated by Edmund Husserl, and offers solutions that are relevant today. The article highlights a common thematic field combining phenomenology, neo-Kantianism, and intuitionism. This field is set by the initial subject-object cognitive attitude, the desire to identify the conditions for the possibility of cognition, the recognition of the presence of a non-linguistic level of knowledge. Moving in this unified theoretical cognitive context of the early twentieth century, Seseman offers his own solution to the following problems: defining the subject of cognition, developing the method of intuition in general and in relation to the contemplation of essence, distinguishing between objective and non-objective attitudes and using this distinction to describe different types of cognition, thematizing the irrational in cognition, and understanding the judgment and its role in the final formation of cognition. Seseman believes that the cognition of reality is preceded by the perception of its objects. He diverges from the Neo-Kantians, who claim that the objects of cognition are formed only in judgment, and holds a position than Husserl, according to whom we perceive the world around us already objectively. However, unlike Husserl, Seseman does not recognize the cognitive nature of perception and argues that knowledge begins with a reflexive fixation of the object of cognition. The cognition of an individual object is embodied in a judgment in which the relation of the object to its environment is fixed and the object is defined as a unique combination of universal properties. Finally, it is shown that the solution of epistemological questions inevitably leads Seseman to ontological issues.

Keywords
transcendentalism, phenomenology, neo-Kantianism, theory of cognition, subject of cognition, given consciousness, judgment, essence, Seseman.

References

  • Anilionytė, L., & Lozuraitis, A. (2000) The Life of Vosylius Sezemanas and His Critical Realism. In J. Baranova (Ed.), Lithuanian Philosophy: Personas and Ideas (187–200). Washington: Council for Research in Values & Philosophy.
  • Belov, V. (2012). Sezeman—a Taxonomist of Russian Neo-Kantianism. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 121–126. (In Russian)
  • Belov, V. (2017). Modern Studies of the Work of Vasily Sezeman Abroad. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (2), 411–424. (In Russian)
  • Botz-Bornstein, T. (2006). Vasily Sesemann Experience, Formalism and the Question of Being. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
  • Chardybon, B. (2015). Philosophy of Vasily Sesemann and Marburg Neo-Kantianism. Kantovskiy sbornik, 3 (53), 66–85. (In Russian)
  • Dmitriyeva, N. (2007). Russian Neo-Kantianism: “Marburg” in Russia. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (2009). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (2018). The Idea of Phenomenology. Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (1985). Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesungen 1906/1907. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1992). Erfahrung und Urteil. Hamburg: Meiner.
  • Husserl, E. (1995). Logik und allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie. Vorlesungen 1917/1918. Den Haag: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Husserl, E. (2001). Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesung 1902/1903. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Ingarden, R. (1999). Introduction to the Husserl Phenomenology. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Dom intellektual’noy knigi Publ. (In Russian)
  • Jonkus, D. (2015). Phenomenological Approaches to Self-Consciousness and the Unconscious (Moritz Geiger and Vasily Seseman). Studia Phenomenologica, XV, 225–237.
  • Jonkus, D. (2017). The Philosophy of Vasily Seseman: Neo-Kantianism, Intuitionism and Phenomenology. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (1), 79-96. (In Russian)
  • Jonkus. D. (2015). Vosyliaus Sezemano filosofija: savees pazxinimo ir estetinexs patirties fenomenologija. Vilnius: Versus Aureus.
  • Rickert, G. (1913). Two Ways of the Theory of Cognition. Novye Idei v Filosofii, 7, 1–79. (In Russian)
  • Rickert, G. (1925). The Problem of Idealism in Philosophy. Rus. Ed. Logos, 1, 109–173. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (1911). Rational und irrational im System der Philosophie. Logos, 1, 93–122. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (1925). Review of the Book by N. Hartmann “The Main Features of the Metaphysics of Cognition”. Logos, 1, 229–235. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (1927). Rationales und irrationales. In Studien zum Erkenntnisproblem II (129-192). Kaunas: Valstybes Spaustuve.
  • Seseman, V. (1932). Die logischen Gesetze und das Sein. Sonderbruck aus „Eranos“ II. Heft. Kaunas.
  • Seseman, V. (2010). Ethics of Plato and the Problem of Evil. Kantovskiy sbornik, 1 (13), 75–89. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2011). The Real Attitude and the “Pure” (Attitudeless) Knowledge. From the Manuscript Heritage. Kantovskii sbornik, 2 (36), 83–89. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2012). Das Problem des Idealismus in der Philosophie. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 127–133. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2013) Aesthetics I. Kant. In V. Belov & L. Tetyuyev (Eds.), Filosofiya Kanta i osnovaniya prakticheskoy filosofii (75-89). Rus. Ed. Saratov: Novyy proyekt. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2017). Manuscripts. Scheler, Lossky, Bergson (1950–1955). Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (1), 201–210. (In Russian)
  • Shiyan, A. (2019). The Project of the Descriptive Metaphysics of Edmund Husserl: Cognitive Consciousness and the Problems of Cognition. In S. Katrechko & A. Shiyan (Eds.), Transtsendental’nyy povorot v sovremennoy filosofii (4): transtsendental’naya metafizika, epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, teologiya i filosofiya soznaniya (194–203). Moscow: GAUGN–Press, Fond TSGI. (In Russian)
  • Sverdiolas, A. (2010). Vasily Seseman: The Other and Time. In M. Drunga & L. Donskis (Eds.), Vasily Seseman: Selected Papers (15-33). Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
  • Yakovenko, B. (2000). What is Philosophy? (Introduction to Transcendentalism). In A. Yermichev (Ed.), Moshch’ filosofii (91-164). St Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Article/Publication Details
Views: 1289


GEORG WILHELM FRIEDRICH HEGEL
LECTURES ON PHILOSOPHY OF NATURE FROM THE WINTER SEMESTER 1821/22, REPRESENTED ON THE BASIS OF TWO ANONYMOUS REVISED LECTURE NOTES. FRAGMENTS. THE DOCTRINE OF SPACE AND TIME

Title in the language of publication: ГЕОРГ ВИЛЬГЕЛЬМ ФРИДРИХ ГЕГЕЛЬ
ЛЕКЦИИ ПО ФИЛОСОФИИ ПРИРОДЫ ЗИМНЕГО СЕМЕСТРА 1821/22 ГОДА, ПРЕДСТАВЛЕННЫЕ НА ОСНОВЕ ДВУХ АНОНИМНЫХ ДОРАБОТАННЫХ КОНСПЕКТОВ. ФРАГМЕНТЫ. УЧЕНИЕ О ПРОСТРАНСТВЕ И ВРЕМЕНИ
Translated from German: ANTON FOMIN, ALEXANDER FROLOV
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 343-378
Language: Russian
Document type: Translation from German
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-343-378 PDF (Downloads: 1980)

Abstract
---

Keywords
---

References

  • Bonsiepen, W. (1985). Hegels Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Dargestellt anhand zweier Vorlesungsnachschriften. Hegel-Studien, 20, 39-78.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Philosophy of Nature. In Entsiklopedia Filosofskikh Nauk. Vol. 2 (7-574). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Article/Publication Details
Views: 1368


WOLFGANG BONSIEPEN
HEGEL’S DOCTRINE OF SPACE AND TIME, PRESENTED ON THE BASIS OF TWO REVISED LECTURE NOTES

Title in the language of publication: ВОЛЬФГАНГ БОНЗИПЕН
УЧЕНИЕ ГЕГЕЛЯ О ПРОСТРАНСТВЕ И ВРЕМЕНИ, ПРЕДСТАВЛЕННОЕ НА ОСНОВЕ ДВУХ ДОРАБОТАННЫХ КОНСПЕКТОВ ЛЕКЦИЙ
Translated from German: ANTON FOMIN, ALEXANDER FROLOV
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 306-342
Language: Russian
Document type: Translation from German
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-306-342 PDF (Downloads: 2001)

Abstract
The article is devoted to the genesis of Hegel’s philosophy of nature. It shows us that the formation of the natural philosophical views of the German philosopher took place not only in a speculative way, in the critical reception of Schelling’s works, but, first of all and for the most part, was predetermined by Hegel’s own interest in natural science and acquaintance with some prominent scientists of that time. The focus of the paper is on the evolution of the first part of Hegel’s natural philosophy: the doctrine of space and time as it presented in some excerpts from two revised lecture notes on the philosophy of nature, read by Hegel in the winter semester of 1821/1822 at the University of Berlin and published as an appendix to the article by Bonzipen. In his article, Bonzipen provides historical information on the fate of these texts, raises the question of their authorship, gives a general outline of Hegel’s thought, and also compares both texts with the second edition of the Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. From his point of view, the revised notes allow partly to illustrate, partly to fill in some gaps in the dialectic of two forms of abstract appearance known on the basis of the Encyclopedia. Bonzipen notes that Hegel’s speculative consideration of space and time is complemented by a discussion with the history of philosophy and the history of mathematics. While reproaching traditional mathematics for being fixed on the quantitative aspect of reality, which does not allow to fully resolve the contradiction between space and time, Hegel at the same time refuses to attempt to build philosophical mathematics that focuses on the consideration of the qualitative certainty of the moments of space and time, declaring that although it is solvable, it is an extremely time-consuming task. This refusal becomes a turning point in the further development of the dialectical doctrine of space and time.

Keywords
Hegel, philosophy of nature, nature, dialectic, time, space, ontology.

References

  • Aristotle. (1976a). On the Heavens. II, 2. 284b–285b. In Sochineniya v 4 tomah. T. 3 (263-378). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)
  • Aristotle. (1976b). Metaphysics. I, 6. In Sochineniya v 4 tomah. T. 1 (63-368). Rus. Ed. M.: Mysl‘ Publ. (In Russian)
  • Beierwaltes, W. (1965). Proclos. Grundzüge seiner Metaphysik. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Betzenhöfer, W. (1922). Hölderlins Studienjahre im Tübinger Stift. Heilbronn, ohne Verlag.
  • Böhle, R. (1978). Der Begriff des Individuums bei Leibniz. Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain.
  • Bonsiepen, W. (1985a). Hegels Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Dargestellt anhand zweier Vorlesungsnachschriften. In F. Nicolin & O. Pöggeler (Hg.), Hegel-Studien, 20 (9-38). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Bonsiepen, W. (1985b). Review of the Book “Hegel e la matematica dell’ infinito”, by Antonio Moretto. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 8 (1), 58–61.
  • Bucher, Th. G. (1983). Wissenschaftstheoretische Überlegungen zu Hegels Planetenschrift. Hegel-Studien, 18, 65–137.
  • Dirksen, E. H. (1827). Review of the Books: „Neue Principien des Fluetencalcüls, enthaltend die Grundsätze der Differenzial- und der Variations- Rechnung unabhängig von der gewöhnlichen Fluxionsmethode etc.“, by F. W. Spehr. « Resumé des Leçons données à l’École royale Polytechnique sur le calcul infinitésimal », by M. A. L. Cauchy. Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Kritik, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157,158, 159, 160, 1217–1271.
  • Dirksen, E. H. (1829). Review of the Book „Lehrbuch der algebraischen Analysis“, by A. L. Cauchy. Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Kritik, 27, 28, 211–222.
  • Engelhardt, D., von. (1975). Naturphilosophie im Urteil der „Heidelberger Jahrbücher der Literatur“ 1808–1832. Heidelberger Jahrbücher, 19, 53–82.
  • Fichte, J. G. (2000). The Vocation of Man. In Fakty soznaniya. Naznachenie cheloveka. Naukouchenie (564-721). Rus. Ed. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian)
  • Fleckenstein, J. O. (1974). Hegels Interpretation der Cavalierischen Infinitesimalmethode. Hegel-Studien, 11, 117–124.
  • Frank, E. (1923). Plato und die sogenannten Pythagoreer. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
  • Gosztonyi, А. (1976). Der Raum: Geschichte seiner Probleme in Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Bd. 1. Freiburg; München: Verlag Karl Alber.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1833a). Werke. Bd. 13. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Teil 1. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1833b). Werke. Bd. 14. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Teil 2. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1842). Werke. Bd. 7, Abt. 1. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. Zweiter Teil. Die Naturphilosophie. Berlin: Duncker und Humbl.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1928). Erste Druckschriften. Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1938). Nürnberger Schriften. Texte, Reden, Berichte und Gutachten zum Nürnberger Gymnasialunterricht (1808–1816) . Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1956). Berliner Schriften (1818-1831) . Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1967). Jenaer Realphilosophie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1968). Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 4: Jenaer kritische Schriften. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 7: Jenaer Systementwürfe II. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 6: Jenaer Systementwürfe I. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1976). Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 8: Jenaer Systementwürfe III. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1978). Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 11: Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Band: Die objektive Logik (1812/1813) . Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1980). Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 9: Phänomenologie des Geistes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1982). Naturphilosophie. Bd. 1: Die Vorlesung von 1819/20. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1985). Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 21: Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Band: Die Lehre vom Sein. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hoffmeister, J. (Hrsg.). (1936). Dokumente zu Hegels Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Fr. Fromanns Verlag.
  • Hoffmeister, J. (Hrsg.). (1969). Briefe von und an Hegel. Bd. 1. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Jamme, Ch., & Schneider, H. (Hrsg.). (1984). Mythologie der Vernunft. Hegels „ältestes Systemprogramm des deutschen Idealismus“ . Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
  • Kaulbach, F. (1960). Die Metaphysik des Raumes bei Leibniz und Kant. Köln: Kölner Universitäts-Verlag.
  • Kimmerle, H. (1967). Dokumente zu Hegels Jenaer Dozententätigkeit (1801–1807). Hegel-Studien, 4, 21–99.
  • Leibniz, G. W. (1975). Die philosophischen Schriften. Bd. 1. Berlin: Weidmann.
  • Lenz, M. (1910). Geschichte der Königlichen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin. Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.
  • Moretto, A. (1984). Hegel e la “matematica dellʼinfinito”. Trento: Verifiche.
  • Neuser, W. (1984). Dokumente einer Entwicklung — Zu Hegels Naturphilosophie. Dialektik, 8, 245–257.
  • Nicolin, F. (1969). Unveröffentlichte Diktate aus einer Enzyklopädie-Vorlesung Hegels. Hegel-Studien, 5, 9–30.
  • Nicolin, F. (Hrsg.). (1970a). Der junge Hegel in Stuttgart. Marbach: Deutsches Literaturarchiv.
  • Nicolin, F. (Hrsg.). (1970b). Hegel in Berichten seiner Zeitgenossen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Nicolin, F. (Hrsg.). (1977). Briefe von und an Hegel. Bd. 4, Teil 1. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Nohl, H. (Hrsg.). (1907). Hegels theologische Jugendschriften. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
  • Plato. (1971). Timaeus. 34b. In Sobranie Sochinenij v 3 tomah. T. 3 (1) (421-500). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)
  • Plotinus. (2004). Ennead III, 7. On Time and Eternity. In Tret’ya Enneada (362-400). Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Olega Abyshko Publ. (In Russian)
  • Ritter, J. W. (1984). Fragmente aus dem Nachlasse eines jungen Physikers. Hanau/Main: Müller & Kiepenheuer.
  • Rosenkranz, K. (1969). G. W. F. Hegels Leben. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (2., unveränd. reprograf. Nachdruck der Ausgabe Berlin 1844).
  • Sextus Empiricus. (1975). Against the Professors. In Sochineniya v 2 tomah, vol. 1 (61-376). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (in Russian)
  • Schneider, H. (1972). Unveröffentlichte Vorlesungsmanuskripte Hegels. Hegel-Studien, 7, 9–61.
  • Uxkull, B. (1965). Armeen und Amouren. Ein Tagebuch aus napoleonischer Zeit (Bearbeitet und hrsg. von J.-D. Freiherr von Uexküll). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag.
  • Wandschneider, D. (1982). Raum, Zeit und Relativität: Grundbestimmungen der Physik in der Perspektive der Hegelschen Naturphilosophie. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

Article/Publication Details
Views: 1150


THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION OF W. BONZIPEN’S ARTICLE “HEGEL’S DOCTRINE OF SPACE AND TIME, PRESENTED ON THE BASIS OF TWO REVISED LECTURE NOTES”

Title in the language of publication: ПРЕДИСЛОВИЕ К ПЕРЕВОДУ СТАТЬИ В. БОНЗИПЕНА «УЧЕНИЕ ГЕГЕЛЯ О ПРОСТРАНСТВЕ И ВРЕМЕНИ, ПРЕДСТАВЛЕННОЕ НА ОСНОВЕ ДВУХ ДОРАБОТАННЫХ КОНСПЕКТОВ ЛЕКЦИЙ»
Authors: ANTON FOMIN, ALEXANDER FROLOV
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 298-305
Language: Russian
Document type: Preface to the translation
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-298-305 PDF (Downloads: 2028)

Abstract
The article is devoted to the genesis of Hegel’s philosophy of nature. It shows us that the formation of the natural philosophical views of the German philosopher took place not only in a speculative way, in the critical reception of Schelling’s works, but, first of all and for the most part, was predetermined by Hegel’s own interest in natural science and acquaintance with some prominent scientists of that time. The focus of the paper is on the evolution of the first part of Hegel’s natural philosophy: the doctrine of space and time as it presented in some excerpts from two revised lecture notes on the philosophy of nature, read by Hegel in the winter semester of 1821/1822 at the University of Berlin and published as an appendix to the article by Bonzipen. In his article, Bonzipen provides historical information on the fate of these texts, raises the question of their authorship, gives a general outline of Hegel’s thought, and also compares both texts with the second edition of the Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. From his point of view, the revised notes allow partly to illustrate, partly to fill in some gaps in the dialectic of two forms of abstract appearance known on the basis of the Encyclopedia. Bonzipen notes that Hegel’s speculative consideration of space and time is complemented by a discussion with the history of philosophy and the history of mathematics. While reproaching traditional mathematics for being fixed on the quantitative aspect of reality, which does not allow to fully resolve the contradiction between space and time, Hegel at the same time refuses to attempt to build philosophical mathematics that focuses on the consideration of the qualitative certainty of the moments of space and time, declaring that although it is solvable, it is an extremely time-consuming task. This refusal becomes a turning point in the further development of the dialectical doctrine of space and time.

Keywords
Hegel, philosophy of nature, nature, dialectic, time, space, ontology.

References

  • Bonsiepen, W. (1985). Hegels Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Dargestellt anhand zweier Vorlesungsnachschriften. Hegel-Studien, 20, 9-38.

Article/Publication Details
Views: 1442


THE PHENOMENON OF EREIGNIS IN MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S PHILOSOPHY

Title in the language of publication: ФЕНОМЕН EREIGNIS В ФИЛОСОФИИ М. ХАЙДЕГГЕРА
Author: ALEXEY STOVBA
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 276-297
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-276-297 PDF (Downloads: 1901)

Abstract
The article is devoted to the reasoning of the „Ereignis“ phenomenon in the philosophy of M. Heidegger. It is worth to emphasize that one of the main trends in contemporary philosophy is an attempt of creation of new–non-substantial–ontology. The very specificity of such ontology lies in the fact that classical substance is replaced by the dynamical configuration of sense, which is not “purely theoretical” but “ontological” in its core. “Ontological” means, in fact, that it is impossible to separate the mode of Being of phenomena from the process of thinking about them. Heidegger’s philosophy was one of the first attempts to create such ontology. It is worth to point out the three steps of the Heidegger’s studies of Being. The first, “fundamental-ontological” step is characterized primarily through the “ontological difference” between Being and entity, when the phenomenon of time represents by itself their hidden basis. During the second, “radical-ontological” period, Heidegger has already carried out his famous “turn.” In compliance with this “turn,” the truth of Being, die Lichtung, substitutes time as the “pre-ontological” basement of Being. In this case, Being itself transforms into the Event, „Ereignis“. On the third, “post-ontological” stage of studies the focal point of Heidegger’s thought is “post-ontological difference” between the Being of entity and Being itself. On this stage both Being and time are rooted in the phenomenon of „Ereignis“. The latter has been now transformed from being a “simple Event” into a “matter of fact” (the new interpretation of the Husserl’s famous „die Sache selbst“) as the alternation of the “disclosedness” and “concealness” of Being and time. In this case, „Ereignis“ is not quasi-substantial basement of Being, time or entity but it shows itself as its “Beginning” („Anfang“)“), when the Truth of Being is replaced by the dynamical sense configuration of the event, i.e., a “matter of fact.” Thus, Heidegger has conceptually created a new type of thnon-substantial ontology, the core of which is the phenomenon of „Ereignis“ as the dynamical singular configuration of the temporal-ontological sense of the Event itself.

Keywords
ontology, dynamical configuration of sense, ontological difference, post-ontological difference, event, matter of fact.

References

  • Badiou, A. (2005). Being and Event. London: The Tower Building.
  • Bibikhin, V. (2009). Heidegger: From “Being and Time” to „Beiträge“. Hermeneya, 1 (1), 95-117. (In Russian)
  • Cherniakov, A. (2001). Ontology of Time. St Petersburg: Vysshaia religioznaia shkola Publ. (In Russian)
  • Deleuze, G. (1998). Logic of Sense. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Raritet Publ., Ekaterinburg: Delovaya Kniga Publ. (In Russian)
  • Grondin, J. (2011). The Turn in the Thinking of Martin Heidegger. Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Russkii mir Publ. (In Russian)
  • Ingarden, R. (2006). The Debate about Being of the World. Time and Mode of Existence. Rus. Ed. Voprosy filosofii, 12, 147-163. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M. (1993). The Letter About Humanism. In Time and Being (192-220). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M. (1978). Metaphysische Anfangsgrunde der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (1997). Being and Time. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M. (2001a). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
  • Heidegger, М. (2001b). Seminar in Zeringen (1973). In E. Borisov (Ed.), Issledovaniya po Fenomenologii i Filosofskoj Germenevtike (108-123). Rus. Ed. Minsk: EGU Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M. (2001c). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Vysshaia religiozno-filosofskaya shkola Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M. (2007a). Das Ende der Philosophie und die Aufgabe des Denkens. In Zur Sache des Denkens (61-80). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2007b). Der Weg zur Sprache. In Unterwegs zur Sprache (227-258). Stuttgart: Klett-Gotta.
  • Heidegger, M. (2007c). Protokoll zu einem Seminar über den Vortrag „Zeit und Sein“. In Zur Sache des Denkens (27-58). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2007d). Zeit und Sein. In Zur Sache des Denkens (1-26). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2009). Contributions to Philosophy. (From Enowning). Rus. Ed. Hermeneya, 1 (1), 56- 94. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M. (2013). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)
  • Herrmann, F.-W. von. (2000). The Temporality of Being-There and Time of Being. In Ponyatie Fenomenologii u Hajdeggera i Gusserlya (149-166). Rus. Ed. Minsk: Propilei Publ. (In Russian)
  • Patkul, А. (2012). Time as the Horizon of Understanding of Being in the Fundamental Ontology. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 1 (1), 28- 47. (In Russian)
  • Seubold, G. (2003). Ereignis. Was immer schon geschehen ist, bevor wir etwas tun. In D. Thomae (Ed.), Heidegger. Handbuch. Leben-Werk-Wirkung (335-340). Stuttgart-Weimar: Verlag J.B. Metzler.