Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 2760


“LA DIFFERANCE” AND “RIEN ENROULE”: YOUNG MARC RICHIR READS DERRIDA

Title in the language of publication: «РАЗЛИЧАНИЕ» И «СВЕРНУТОЕ НИЧЕГО»: КАК МОЛОДОЙ РИШИР ЧИТАЕТ ДЕРРИДА
Author: DENIS MIKHAYLOV
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 12, №1 (2023), 141-158
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2023-12-1-141-158 PDF (Downloads: 2760)

Abstract
This paper analyzes the influence of J. Derrida’s philosophy on the early thought of French phenomenologist M. Richir. Main texts for the analysis are Derrida’s report « La Différance » and the article « Le Rien Enroulé » by Richir. The author stresses their deep figurative and substantive interconnectedness. Thus, Richir borrows from Derrida a number of key philosophical figures, including the figure of différance itself, and applies them to phenomenological landscape through the “first-person” narrative. Having examined the correlation between Derrida’s figures of différance and Richir’s phenomenalization, the author concludes that Richir, influenced by the impersonal figure of différance, leads his “first-person” narrative in an attempt to take it beyond the limits of classical phenomenological discourse. Moreover, the author finds preconditions for Richir’s introduction of one of his early key concepts “nothing” (rien) in the text of Derrida’s « La Différance ». The main thesis of this research is: Richir borrows Derrida’s understanding of consciousness and performs phenomenological description from its perspective. The paper considers Derrida’s text as a key to understanding Richir’s article « Le Rien Enroulé » and, as a result, the key to his early philosophy in general.

Keywords
Marc Richir, Jacques Derrida, new French phenomenology, structuralism, nothing, difference, phenomenalization.

References

  • Avtonomova, N. (1977). Philosophical Problems of Structural Analysis in Humanities. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
  • Carlson, S. (2010). L’essence du phenomena: La pensée de Marc Richir face à la tradition phénoménologique. Eikasia. Revista de Filosofía, 34, 199–360.
  • Chernavin, G. (2014). The Preface to the Translation of “’Eποχή, Flicker and Reduction in Phenomenology” by Marc Richir. In (Post)phenomenology in France: The New Phenomenology in France and Beyond (204–208). Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)
  • Derrida, J. (2000). Differance. In “Voice and Phaenomenon” and Other Works in Theory of Sign (169–208). Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Aleteia Publ. (In Russian)
  • Hicks, S. (2021). Explaining Postmodernism. Rus. Ed. Moscow: RIPOL klassik Publ. (In Russian)
  • Mikhaylov, D. (2020). The World Outside the Window: The Preface to the Translation of the Article “Defenestration” by Marc Richir. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 9 (2), 749–759. (In Russian)
  • Richir, M. (1970). Le Rien Enroulé. Esquisse d’une pensée de la phénoménalisation. Textures, 70 (7.8), 3–24.
  • Richir, M. (2020). Defenestation. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 9 (2), 760–781. (In Russian)
  • Saussure, F. de (1999). Course in General Linguistics. Rus. Ed. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo Universiteta Publ. (In Russian)
  • Yampolskaya, A. (2017). Phenomenological Reduction as Artistic Device. Voprosy Filosofii, 2, 156–166. (In Russian)
  • Yampolskaya, A. (2019). The Art of Phenomenology. Moscow: RIPOL klassik Publ. (In Russian)