Article/Publication Details
Views: 2057

HUSSERL AND DERRIDA ON THE PROCESS OF SENSE FORMATION—GAPS AND EXCESSES

Abstract
This paper deals with the problem of the origin of sense and meaning. For Husserl, the determination of the ideal identity of something new can only take place retroactively in the totality of the preceding series by stepping back towards the original foundation of sense. In this regard, J. Derrida questions the ideality of the same as presence and the possibility of retrieving any arché of sense in his writings Speech and Phenomena and Edmund Husserl’s Origin of Geometry. Phenomenology is not oblivious to these difficulties, as results from a closer reading of the correlation between idealities and sensory experience: It will show that there are at least four interrelated gaps in the Husserlian phenomenology which testify the difficulty in grasping a retraceable arché of sense. First, the gap between the ideality of sense and its representation. Second, the gap between sensory and categorial intuitions, whereby both exceed one another. Third, the gap between the ideality of sense and the sense which exceeds our expectations. Fourth, the gap between the experience of the new that overcomes us and its apprehension by consciousness. Hence, there is a fundamental gap between the conceptual idealities and the essential indeterminacy of our phenomenological sensory experience, which is correlative to an excess of one in respect to the other. In this sense, Derrida’s concepts of « différance » and “invention” allow us to conceive of this self-givenness of sense as the expression of its constant self-renewal. This expression takes the form of a trace, which, neither present nor absent, suspends meaning and full presence, leaving the narrative “open” for the reinvention of sense.

Keywords
arché, differánce, excess, event, gap, meaning, presence, sense, trace.

References

• Bernet, R. (2004a). Conscience et Existence. Paris: PUF.
• Bernet, R. (2004b). La vie du sujet. Paris: PUF.
• Bernet, R. (1995). Derrida and His Master’s Voice. In W. Mc. Kenna & J. C. Evans (Eds.), Derrida and Phenomenology (1–21). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Breuer, I. (2015). Husserls Lehre von den sinnlichen und kategorialen Anschauungen. Der sinnliche Überschuss des Sinnbildungsprozesses und seine doxische Erkenntnisform. In Ch. Asmuth & P. Remmers (Eds.), Ästhetisches Wissen (231–245). Berlin-Boston.
• Breuer, I. (2019a). Ideation und Idealisierung: Die mathematische Exaktheit der Idealbegriffe und ihre Rolle im Konstitutionsprozess bei Husserl. META: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, XI (2), 547–568. Retrieved from http://www.metajournal.org/articles_pdf/547-568-breuer-meta-2019-no2-rev.pdf
• Breuer, I. (2019b). Husserl und die kritische Rehabilitierung der aristotelischen Ontologie. Husserl Studies, 35, 203–224.
• Breuer, I. (2020a). Towards a Phenomenological Metaphysics. The Contingent Core of the Ego and of all Eidetic Forms. In J. Apostolescu & C. Serban (Eds.), Husserl, Kant and Transcendental Phenomenology (213–234). Berlin: De Gruyter.
• Breuer, I. (2020b). Ort, Raum, Unendlichkeit. Aristoteles und Husserl auf dem Weg zu einer lebensweltlichen Raumerfahrung. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
• Crowell, St. G. (2001). Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning. Paths toward Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and Phenomena (D. Allison, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology (G. Chakravorty Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore/London: J. Hopkins University Press.
• Derrida, J. (1978a). Edmund Husserl’s Origin of Geometry: An Introduction (J. P. Leavey, Trans.). Jr. Stoney Brook/New York: Nicolas Hays.
• Derrida, J. (1978b). Force and Signification. In A. Bass (Trans.), Writing and Difference (3-30). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Derrida, J. (1981). Dissemination (B. Johnson, Trans.). London: Athlone.
• Derrida, J. (1989). Fifty-Two Aphorisms for a Foreword. In A. Papadakis, C. Cooke & A. Benjamin (Eds.), Deconstruction. Omnibus Volume (67–69). London: Academy Editions.
• Derrida, J. (1991). Psyche: Inventions of the Other. In P. Kamuf (Ed.), A Derrida Reader (200-220), New York: Columbia University Press.
• Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations: Introduction to Phenomenology (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and Transcendental Logic (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern Univ. Press.
• Husserl, E. (1973). Experience and Judgment. Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic (L. Landgrebe, Ed., J. Churchill & K. Ameriks, Trans.). London: Routledge.
• Husserl, E. (1977). Phenomenological Psychology. Lectures, Summer Semester 1925 (J. Scanlon, Trans.). The Hague: Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology (F. Kersten, Trans.). The Hague: Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1984). Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesungen 1906/07 (Hua XXIV). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1987). Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911-1921) (Hua XXV). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Husserl, E. (1999). The Idea of Phenomenology (Hua II) (L. Hardy, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Husserl, E. (2001a). Logical Investigations, Vol. I (D. Moran, Ed., J. N. Findlay, Trans.). London: Routledge.
• Husserl, E. (2001b). Logical Investigations. Vol. II (D. Moran, Ed., J. N. Findlay, Trans.). London: Routledge.
• Husserl, E. (2001c). Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic (A. Steinbock, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Husserl, E. (2001d). Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewusstsein (1917/18) (Hua XXXIII). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Husserl, E. (2002). Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil. Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logischen Untersuchungen (Sommer 1913) (Hua XX/1). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Kern, I. (1964). Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung über Husserls Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969). La prose du monde. Paris: Gallimard.
• Pradelle, D. (2012). The Phenomenological Foundations of Predicative Structure. In D. Zahavi (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology (349–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Richir, M. (2000). Von der phänomenologischen Analyse als Zickzack-Bewegung. In Das Abenteuer der Sinnbildung. Aufsätze zur Phänomenalität der Sprache (51–77). Wien: Turia und Kant.
• Richir, M. (2011). Über die phänomenologische Revolution. In H. D. Gondek, T. N. Klass & L. Tengelyi (Eds.), Phänomenologie der Sinnereignisse (62–77). München: Fink.
• Tengelyi, L. (2007). Erfahrung und Ausdruck. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Tengelyi, L. (2014). Welt und Unendlichkeit. Zum Problem phänomenologischer Metaphysik. Freiburg: Alber.
• Walton, R. J. (1995). Permanencia y fluencia en el análisis husserliano de la temporalidad. Escritos de Filosofía, 14, 310–329.