Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 4130


FRIEDRICH WILHELM JOSEPH SCHELLING
PRESENTATION OF PHILOSOPHICAL EMPIRICISM
From the Introduction to Philosophy: Presented in Munich, most recently in 1836.
(From the Handwritten Remains)

Title in the language of publication: ФРИДРИХ ВИЛЬГЕЛЬМ ЙОЗЕФ ШЕЛЛИНГ
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ ФИЛОСОФСКОГО ЭМПИРИЗМА
Из Введения в философию. Читано в Мюнхене, последний раз в 1836 г.
(Из рукописного наследия)
Translation from German: Andrei Patkul
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 4, №2 (2015),  239-283
Language: Russian
Document type: Translation
Translated from: Schelling, F. W. J. (1861). Sämmtliche Werke. I. Abteilung. Bd X. Stuttgart und Augsburg: J.G. Gotta’scher.
DOI : 10.18199/2226-5260-2015-4-2-239-283 PDF (Downloads: 3531)

Abstract
This publication is the translation of the first fragment of F. W. J Schelling's Presentation of Philosophical Empiricism accompanied by the analytical translator's preface. In his treatise, Schelling assesses the history of modern philosophy. Namely, he treats it as history of experiments, the goal of which was in the search for the primary fact in the world. In Schelling's opinion, this fact is in the growing over-weight of the subjective over the objective. Only his philosophy of nature was able to find this fact. However, it is not genuine fact but only pure fact, because it does not content in itself any ground for the over-weighting of the subjective over the objective. For resolve this problem, Schelling starts to use the concepts formed by Ancient philosophers, namely by Pythagoras and Plato. The concepts of the limitless and the limit are belonging to the series of the mentioned concepts. Accordantly, Schelling associates the notion of the objective with the one of the limitless being and the notion of the subjective with the one of the limit or limiting instance. His inquiry into the correlation between the limitless being and the limit, i.e. between the objective and the subjective leads him to the declaration of the existence of the free efficient cause, which determinates their interplay and the rise of that-what-should-be from that-what-should-not-be. Since the limitless is the objective and the limit is the subjective in accordance with Schelling, such efficient cause is also the cause of the progressive over-weighting of the subjective over the objective as well. It can explain the fact, which the Schelling's philosophy of nature has only found but not explained. The in his preface, the translator puts the question of the possibility as well as of a relevance of the Schelling's late philosophy to the phenomenological thought. In this context, he emphasizes few moments, by which the later Schelling' philosophy could be of interests for phenomenologists, namely the following ones: the concept of philosophical empiricism itself, the Schelling's division between the pure fact and the genuine fact, his treatment of history of philosophy as history of experiments. Moreover, he speaks about main difficulties connected with the translation of Schelling's text into Russian and gives a German-Russian glossary for utility of Russian readers. The translator gives also the commentaries by Arthur Drews, who reedited the Schelling's treatise in 1902, in their Russian translation.

Key words
Philosophical empiricism, genuine fact, over-weight of the subjective over the objective, subjection, the limitless, limit, substance, cause, German idealism.

References

  • Aristotel'. (1976). Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. [Works in Four Volumes. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
  • Aristotel'. (1981). Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 3. [Works in Four Volumes. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
  • Berkli, Dzh. (1978). Sochinenniya [Works]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
  • Booth, E. (2000). Leibniz and Schelling. Studia Leibniziana, 32, 86-104.
  • Dekart, R. (1994). Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 2. [Works in Two Volumes. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
  • Drews, A. (1897). Das Ich als Grundproblem der Metaphysik. Freiburg im Breisgau, Leipzig, Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  • Galuzzo, G. (2012). The Medieval Reception of Book Zeta of Aristotle's Metaphysics. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
  • Gippokrat. (1944). Sochineniya v trekh tomakh. T. 2. [Works in Three Volumes. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Medgiz. (in Russian).
  • Goethe, J. W. (2005). Werke, Kommentare und Register. Bd. 14. Naturissenschaftliche Schriften II, Materialen, Register. München: C.H. Beck.
  • Hartmann, E. V. (1896). Kategorienlehre. Leipzig: H. Haacke.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1836). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Bd. 3. Berlin: Dunker und Humblot.
  • Kant, I. (1964). Kritika chistogo razuma. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 3. [Critique of Pure Reason. Works in six volumes. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
  • Lebedev, A. V. (Eds.). (1989). Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Chast' I. Ot epicheskikh kosmogonii do vozniknoveniya atomistiki [The Fragments of Early Ancient Greek Philosophers. Part One. From the Epical Cosmogonies to the Rise of Atomistic]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Leibnits, G. V. (1982). Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. [Works in Four Volums. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Leibnits, G. V. (1989). Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 4. [Works in Four Volums. Vol. 4]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Leinkauf, Th. (1998). Schelling als Interpret der philosophischen Tradition: Zur Rezeption und Transformation von Platon, Plotin, Aristoteles und Kant. Münster: Lit.
  • Mal'bransh, N. (1999). Razyskaniya istiny [Investigations of the Truth]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Marquet, J.-F. (1985). Schelling et Descartes. Les Études philosophiques, 2, 237–250.
  • Platon. (1993). Sobranie sochinenii v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 2. [Collected Papers in Four Volumes. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
  • Platon. (1994). Sobranie sochinenii v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 3. [Collected Papers in Four Volumes. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
  • Plutarch. (1895). Moralia. Leipzig: Teubner.
  • Plutarkh. (2008). Sochineniya [Works]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publ. (in Russian).
  • Rezvykh, P. V. (2003). Pozdnii Shelling i Kant [The Late Schelling and Kant]. In Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik [Yearbook of History of Philosophy] (280-303). (in Russian).
  • Rezvykh, P. V. (2004). Rannii Shelling i Kant [The Early Schelling and Kant]. In Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik [Yearbook of History of Philosophy] (250-278). (in Russian).
  • Schelling, F. W. J. (1861). Sämmtliche Werke. I. Abteilung. Bd. X. Stuttagert und Augsburg: J. G. Gotta'scher Verlag.
  • Schelling, F. W. J. (1994). Timaeus. (1794). Stuttgart — Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzbog.
  • Shelling, F. V. I. (1989). Sobranie sochinenii v dvukh tomakh. T. 2. [Collected Papers in Two Volumes. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Shelling, F. V. I. (1998). Idei k filosofii prirody kak vvedenie v izuchenie etoi nauki [Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature as an Introduction into this Science]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Shelling, F. V. I. (1999). Sistema mirovykh epokh [The System of the Ages of the World]. Tomsk: Vodolei. (in Russian).
  • Shelling, F. V. I. (2000). Filosofiya otkroveniya. T. 1. [Philosophy of Revelation. Vol. 1]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Shelling, F. V. I. (2014). Izlozhenie moei sistemy filosofii [Presentation of My System of Philosophy]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Shelling, F. V. I. (2013a). Traktat ob istochnike vechnykh istin [On the Source of Eternal Truths]. Einai. Voprosy filosofii i teologii [Einai. The Questions of Philosophy and Theology]. 1/2, (3/4), 154–207. (in Russian).
  • Shelling, F. V. I. (2013b). Filosofiya mifologii. T. 1. [Philosophy of Mythology. Vol. 1]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publ. (in Russian).
  • Spinoza, B. (1999). Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. [Collected papers in Two Volumes. Vol. 1]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.