- 29 December 2015
Article/Publication Details
Views: 3961
SOME REMARKS ON HEIDEGGER'S INTERPRETATION OF KANT
Title in the language of publication: | EINIGE BEMERKUNGEN ZU HEIDEGGERS KANT-INTERPRETATION |
Author: | Natalia Artemenko |
Issue: |
HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology. Vol. 4, №2 (2015),  186-202 |
Language: | German |
Document type: | Research Article |
DOI : 10.18199/2226-5260-2015-4-2-186-202 | PDF (Downloads: 3544) |
Abstract
Among Heidegger's works his Kant book, «Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics» (1929), takes a
special place. Planned by Heidegger as one of the sections of the second part of «Being and Time», it
was intended to show the importance of the problem of substantiation. In «Being and Time» Heidegger
recognized the achievements of Kant, but at the same time he added that the penetration into the problem
of temporality was beyond Kant's scope. Despite the fact that Kant has come very close to the problem
of time, his investigations remained, according to Heidegger, within the framework of the traditional
ontology. Taking into account the aforementioned features of the interpretation of Kant in «Being
and Time», it looks astonishing, that in his Kant book of 1929 Heidegger intended to demonstrate
the idea of the fundamental ontology of Dasein (which he developed in «Being and Time») with the
example of the interpretation of «Critique of Pure Reason» as the foundation of metaphysics. Heidegger
discovered «clarification of transcendence» in Kant's transcendental deduction of the categories and
Kant's subjective deduction seemed to be a transcendental disclosure of the nature of subjectivity of the
subject. However, it is important to note that in the book «Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics» it is a
question not so much of the historical-philological interpretation of Kant, as of clarifying Heidegger's
internal directional of the fundamental ontology by means of this interpretation. We will try to give
a critical analysis of Heidegger's interpretation, taking into account that Heidegger's analysis of the
Kantian heritage is the sample not of historical, but rather systematic and methodical debate. It is also
one reason why this critical analysis can serve as a reliable support for a more accurate determination
of the essence of the transcendental-phenomenological issues not only in Heidegger's works, but also
in Kant's works.
Key words
Heidegger, Kant, transcendence, fundamental ontology, Dasein, temporality, subjectivity of the subject, objectivity, synthesis.
References
- Cassirer, Е. (1931). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Bemerkungen zu Martin Heideggers Kant-Interpretationen. Kant-Studien, 36, 1–26.
- Heidegger, M. (1973). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt a. M.: V. Klostermann.
- Heidegger, M. (1976a). Logik. Die Frage nach der Wahrheit (GA 21). Frankfurt a. M: V. Klostermann.
- Heidegger, M. (1976b). Vom Wesen des Grundes. Frankfurt a. M.: Wegmarken.
- Heidegger, M. (1977). Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft (GA 25). Frankfurt a. M.: V. Klostermann.
- Heidegger, M. (1986). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
- Kant, I. (1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft . Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
- Levy, H. (1932). Heideggers Kant-Interpretation. Zu Heideggers Buch «Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik». Logos, 31, 1–43.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
" | |
Social networks: