- 06 November 2015
Article/Publication Details
Views: 4681
AN INTERVIEW WITH PROF. JAROSLAV ANATOL'EVICH SLININ
(St. Petersburg State University, 12th September 2013)
Title in the language of publication: |
ИНТЕРВЬЮ С Я. А. СЛИНИНЫМ (САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ, 12 СЕНТЯБРЯ 2013 Г.) |
Prepared by: |
Natalia Artemenko Andrei Patkul |
Issue: | HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology. Vol. 3, №1 (2014),  237-250 |
Language: | Russian |
Document Type: | Interview |
PDF (Downloads: 3579) |
Abstract
This is the text of an interview given by
professor of department of logic of the philosophical
faculty St. Petersburg State University Yaroslav A. Slinin to Natalia Artemenko and Andrei
Patkul. Prof. Slinin talks about the genesis of his philosophical views, in particular, about
his way into phenomenology. His recollections of the phenomenological community in the
former Leningrad is of very interest in the context of Soviet philosophy’s historiography. It
ought to remarked that the course under the titled «Phenomenology and Logic» delivered
by Prof. Slinin since 1970 brought to bear overwhelming influence on the shaping of today’s
philosophical community in St. Petersburg.
Hence, the problems of correlation between phenomenology and logic are discussed in
this interview. Prof. Slinin points that the problematic of logic is the confluence point of
phenomenology and analytical philosophy, which deal with the same problems but by different methods and in different attitudes. The main distinction points between these two
philosophical trends are, on the one hand, that phenomenology has a metaphysical background, which is denied by representatives of classical analytical philosophy, and on the
other hand, that phenomenologists as distinguished from analytical philosophers accept
the intellectual intuition of essences. Prof. Slinin states with regard to correlation between
phenomenology and contemporary cognitive sciences that the Husserl’s distinction of transcendental and natural attitudes is very important up to now. He gives his own interpretation of Husserl’s doctrine of reduction in this context. Prof. Slinin tries to show also that
Heidegger describes by ontological terms the same phenomena which are described by
Husserl in transcendental terms.
As conclusion, Prof. Slinin talk about his other non-phenomenological interests in philosophy, namely, about ancient philosophy (particularly,
patristic, early modern and Russian philosophy.
Key words
Phenomenology, logic, cognitive sciences, philosophy in USSR, reduction, intersubjectivity, theory of subjectivity, ethic.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
" | |
Social networks: