Article/Publication Details
Views: 4947

READERS, SONS OF ECHO: SHARING LITERARY EXPERIENCE

Abstract
This paper aims at analysing, in a phenomenological perspective, how meaning occurs in literary readings as well as in literary discussions. The study takes as its empirical starting point a seminar session, in which several academic readers have shared their experiences of the same novel. It appeared that the constitution of the novel's meaning was modified and continued during the discussion and, therefore, that the meaning of the novel was not available before the discussion happened. Then, to understand what happened before the discussion, the inquiry relies on P. Bayard's theoretical elaborations, which state that the solitary experience of reading itself involves previous readings: the subjectivity of the reader is haunted by a plurality of texts, virtually involved in the process of reading of the novel. Therefore, the article intends to explore the notion of potential space, coined by Winnicott, and to define it as an intersubjective space, made of virtual subjectivities. Ultimately, to describe the way a new meaning has arisen between the participants, the study relies on M. Richir's phenomenology. The point, here, is to question the actual but unconscious interweaving of the subjectivities in the discussion. Thus, the study provides a deeper understanding of the creativity of the act of reading, by assuming that creativity cannot happen without a plurality of subjectivities, existing or virtual.

Key words
Act of reading, phenomenology, cultural experience, creativity, meaning, intersubjectivity.

References

• Bayard, P. (2011). Comment parler des livres qu'on n'a pas lus? Paris: Minuit.
• Husserl, E. (2002). Phantasia, conscience d'image, souvenir: de la phénoménologie des présentifications intuitives: textes posthumes (1898–1925). Grenoble: Millon.
• Richir, M. (1991). Sens et Paroles: pour une approche phénoménologique du langage. In G. Florival (Ed.), Figures de la Rationalité — Études d'Anthropologie philosophique IV (228-246). Louvain: Peeters Publishers.
• Richir, M. (2003). Du rôle de la phantasia au théâtre et dans le roman. Littérature, (132), 24–33.
• Richir, M. (2004). Phantasia, imagination, affectivité. Phénoménologie et anthropologie phénoménologique. Grenoble: Millon.
• Richir, M. (2008). Fragments phénoménologiques sur le langage. Grenoble: Millon.
• Tengelyi, L. (2010). La formation de sens comme événement. Eikasia. Revista de Filosofía, (34), 149–174.
• Vermersch, P. (2005). Tentative d'approche expérientielle du sens se faisant. Expliciter, (60), 48–55.
• Winnicott, D. W. (1975). Jeu et réalité: l'espace potentiel. Paris: Gallimard.
• Winnicott, D. W. (2010). Les Objets transitionnels. Paris: Payot.
• Winnicott, D. W. (2012). De la communication et de la non-communication. La Capacité d'être seul. Paris: Payot.