Article/Publication Details
Views: 6089

ONTOLOGIES AND PHENOMENOLOGIES OF THE POLITICAL BODY:
WAYS OF THE ANALOGY. A READING OF CLAUDE LEFORT

Abstract
This paper focuses on the analogy between the body and the political body, and presents the problem that is still – for our political time – this very analogy. It is done, at first, by following and developing the original work of the French political thinker Claude Lefort, who changed the terms and even the meaning of political phenomenology itself. Yet, if Claude Lefort’s inheritance has to be increased in phenomenology, his thought also reveals a strange paradox which opens with it a critical confrontation that a second article will fully develop, and that is here synthesized: indeed, the analogy of the political body is at the same time what in its very refusal unifies contemporary political philosophies – dismissing the analogy either as the language of another age of politics or as the language of the totalitarian wish of reincorporation –, and what nevertheless continues to resist implicitly in all these political writings, even if it is at times under the mask of the complicated lexicon of some Flesh of the social. By coming back to the concept of Flesh itself and its origin in the thought of M. Merleau-Ponty, the end of the article opens a confrontation between the political phenomenology renewed by Claude Lefort and our own attempt to phenomenologically reform the analogy of the political body.

Key words
Political body, institution, history, democracy, totalitarism, flesh, analogy.

References

• Abensour, M. (2009). Pour une philosophie politique critique. Paris: Sens & Tonka.
• Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Arendt, H. (1968). Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises of Political Thought. New York: Viking Press.
• Bichat, H. (1963). Recherches physiologiques sur la vie et la mort (1800). Genève, Paris, Bruxelles: Alliance culturelle du livre.
• Gleonec, A. (2012). Corps animal et corps humain: l'«effacement» de la propriété. À la naissance de l'institution chez Merleau-Ponty. Studia Phaenomenologica – Possibilities of Embodiment (XII), 109–132.
• Esposito, R. (2010). Communauté, immunité, biopolitique. Paris: Les Prairies ordinaires.
• Kantorowicz, E. (1989). Les deux corps du Roi. Essai sur la théologie politique au Moyen Âge. Paris: Gallimard.
• Lefort, C. & Gauchet, M. (1971). Sur la démocratie. Le politique et l'institution du social. Textures, 2 (3), 7–78.
• Lefort, C. (1978 a). Les formes de l'Histoire. Paris: Gallimard.
• Lefort, C. (1978 b). Sur une colonne absente. Paris: Gallimard.
• Lefort, C. (1981). L'Invention démocratique. Paris: Fayard.
• Lefort, C. (1986). Essais sur le politique. Paris: Seuil.
• Lefort, C. (1992). Écrire. À l'épreuve du politique. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
• Lefort, C. (2007). Le Temps présent: Écrits, 1945–2005. Paris: Belin.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Le visible et l'invisible. Paris: TEL/Gallimard.
• Patočka, J. (1981). Essais hérétiques sur la philosophie de l'histoire. Lagrasse: editions Verdier.
• Platon. (1970). Timée. Paris: PUF.
• Lefort, C. & Roustang F. (1983). Le mythe de l'Un dans le fantasme et la réalité politique. Psychanalystes, 9.
• Richir, M. (1987). Quelques réflexions épistémologiques préliminaires sur le concept de sociétés contre l'Etat. In M. Abensour (Ed.), L’esprit des lois sauvages. Pierre Clastres ou une nouvelle anthropologie politique. Paris: Seuil.
• Richir, M. (2008). Communauté, société et Histoire chez le dernier Merleau-Ponty. In M. Richir & E. Tassin (Eds.), Merleau-Ponty: Phénoménologie et expériences. Grenoble: Millon.
• Taminiaux, J. (2009). Maillons herméneutiques – Etudes de poétique, de phénoménologie et de politique (169–207). Paris: PUF.