Article/Publication Details
Views: 5395

BODY BECOMING IMAGE: THE THEATRICAL WINDOW

Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the question of how to define the essence of the theater, building on a conference Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset held in Lisbon in April 1946, where he radically raised the question of the «strange» relationship between reality and unreality that the «world of the stage» makes possible for us to experience. On the one hand, Ortega states that theater is essentially vision, while, on the other hand, it seems that such a seeing, in itself, leads to a problematic relationship with a not-seeing. In particular, Ortega seems to claim that in theater spectators experience a vision both «paradoxical» and «magic», insofar as it entails an essential not-seeing that gives rise to a play between opacity and transparency. A play that is also to be found in a masterwork many phenomenologists admired, Proust's Recherche, in which, in order for Marcel to see the image of Phaedra, the ordinary body of the actress Berma has to vanish. Here the body becomes transparent and one no longer sees the performer himself: he/she is simply a window opening upon a great work of art. This way, the spectator can experience «this new order of creatures» that reminds us of the «êtres d'une nouvelle nature» of which Du Bos wrote in the Eighteenth Century. However, regarding the topics of the «image-window», Eugen Fink and his teacher Edmund Husserl had already paved the way, and an intertwined reading of some important texts of both authors can in turn shed new light on this question. With regard to Husserl, special attention will be paid to a very interesting text from the Husserliana XXIII (probably dating to 1918) in which he, taking theatrical image into profound consideration, paradoxical and powerful notion of perceptual phantasy.

Key words
Aesthetics, image, theater, transparency, opacity, window, perceptual phantasy, feelings.

References

• Bruzina, R. (2004). Edmund Husserl & Eugen Fink: Beginnings and Ends in Phenomenology, 1928–1938. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
• Deleuze, G. (1990). The Logic of Sense. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Deleuze, G. (2000). Proust & Signs. The Complete Text. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Du Bos, J.-B. (1770). Réflexions critiques sur la poésie et sur la peinture. Paris: Pissot.
• Fink, E. (1966). Vergegenwärtigung und Bild. Beiträge zur Phänomenologie der Unwirklichkeit. In Studien zur Phänomenologie, 1930–1939 (1–18). Den Haag: Nijhoff.
• Fink, E. (1971). Maske und Kothurn. In Epiloge zur Dichtung (1–18). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
• Husserl, E. (1959). Erste Philosophie (1923/1924). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion (Hua VIII). Den Haag: Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1968). Briefe an Roman Ingarden. Mit Erläuterungen und Erinnerungen an Husserl. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (2005). Phantasy, Image Consciousness and Memory (1898–1925). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Husserl, E., & Husserl, M. (1994). E. und M. Husserl an Heidegger, 26. V. 1927. In E. Husserl, Husserliana Dokumente, Band III. Briefwechsel, Teil IV. Die Freiburger Schüler. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Molder, M. F. (2010). Cries, False Substitutes and Expressions of Life. In A. Marques & N. Venturinha (Eds.), Wittgenstein on Forms of Life and the Nature of Experience (39–64). Bern: Peter Lang.
• Ortega y Gasset, J. (1975). The Idea of Theater. An Abbreviated View. In Phenomenology and Art (163–195). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Proust, M. (1983a). Swann's Way. Remembrance of Things Past (Vol. 1). London: Penguin Books.
• Proust, M. (1983b). The Guermantes Way. Remembrance of Things Past (Vol. 2). London: Penguin Books.
• Proust, M. (1983c). Time Regained. Remembrance of Things Past (Vol. 3). London: Penguin Books.
• Vezin, F. (2000). Du côté de Husserl et Heidegger. Le Magazine littéraire, 2 (4), 104–107. Hors-Série.