Article/Publication Details
Views: 772

ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER: PHENOMENOLOGY OF THE BODY AND AESTHETICS

Abstract
The main thesis of this article is that Arthur Schopenhauer was the first to formulate clearly the problem of corporeality as an essential problem of philosophical thought. Schopenhauer can be understood as a philosopher and even as a phenomenologist of corporeality. For the first time in the European thought he explicitly describes the relation between consciousness and the body and offers a phenomenological description of the experience of embodiment, bringing his thought closer to M. Merleau-Ponty’s future phenomenology. The article considers the role of the body in the formation of subjectivity as well as the correlation between the concept of body and the concept of will in the structure of Schopenhauer’s philosophy. Both Schopenhauer and Merleau-Ponty understood the body as a key to the experience of the world and to overcoming the object-subject dichotomy. Hence, while Merleau-Ponty welcomes this conclusion, Schopenhauer considers it is a source of pessimistic sarcasm: the will of which I am the materialization is completely indifferent to my individual existence and uses me as material for its meaningless reproduction. The emphasis on corporeality has important intersections with the development of aesthetics in the 18th century. T. Eagleton thus suggests that Schopenhauer’s philosophy makes a crucial contribution to the modernist project of aesthetics by its “implicit” aesthetics, presupposed by the development of the theme of embodiment, to which he attributes the unexpected “comicality” of Schopenhauer’s philosophy, well suited to the interpretation of absurdist art. The article also considers the influence of Schopenhauer’s philosophy on Beckett’s work, which S. Garner interprets through Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of the body, proving that their reflections on body and flesh can be correlated with Beckett’s theater where the bodily presence of actors is emphasised.

Keywords
corporeality, phenomenology of corporeality, body, aesthetics, phenomenology, postmetaphysical thinking, comical, Schopenhauer, Merleau-Ponty.

References

• Carman, T. (1999). The Body in Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophical Topics, 27 (2), 205–226.
• Critchley, S. (2004). Very little… Almost Nothing. Death, Philosophy, Literature. London, New York: Routledge.
• Eagleton, T. (2004). The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Habermas, J. (1992). Postmetaphysical Thinking. Philosophical Essays. London: MIT Press.
• Heidegger, M. (1993). Being and Time: Articles and Speeches. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian).
• Heidegger, M. (2007). Nietzsche, T. 2. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)
• Hübscher, A. (1994). The Thinkers of Our Time. Rus. Ed. Moscow: TsTR MGP VOS Publ. (In Russian)
• Husserl, E. (2004). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)
• Garner, S. (1993). “Still Living Flesh”: Beckett, Merleau-Ponty and the Phenomenological Body. Theatre Journal, 5 (4), 443–360.
• Hübner, B. (2006). Sense and SENSE-less Time. Rus. Ed. Minsk: Ekonompress Publ. (In Russian)
• Kant, I. (1994). The Critique of Pure Reason. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1992). Eye and Mind. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). In Defense of Philosophy. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo gumanitarnoi literatury Publ. (In Russian)
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1999). Phenomenology of Perception. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Iuventa Publ.; Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2006). The Visible and the Invisible. Rus. Ed. Minsk: Logvinov Publ. (In Russian)
• Mulhall, S. (2001). On Film. London: Routledge.
• Peters, M. (2013). Will and Flesh: Schopenhauer and Merleau-Ponty on Corporeality. In Schopenhauer Jarhbuch (91–114). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
• Scheler, M. (1994). Man and History. In Izbrannye proizvedeniia (129–194). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Gnozis Publ. (In Russian)
• Schopenhauer, A. (1993a). The World as Will and Representation. In O chetveroiakom korne zakona dostatochnogo osnovaniia. Mir kak volia i predstavlenie. T.1. Kritika kantovskoi filosofii (127–609). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
• Schopenhauer, A. (1993b). The World as Will and Representation. In O vole v prirode. Mir kak volia i predstavlenie. T.2 (110–627). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
• Schopenhauer, A. (2001). Paralipomena. In Sobranine sochinenii v 6 tomakh. T. 5. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Terra — Knizhny klub Publ. (In Russian)
• Spiegelberg, H. (2002). The Phenomenological Movement. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Logos Publ. (In Russian)
• Thacker, E. (2017). Starry Speculative Corpse (Horror of Philosophy 2) Vol. 2. Rus. Ed. Perm: Hyle Press. (In Russian)
• Tonning, E. (2015). “I am not Reading Philosophy”: Beckett and Schopenhauer. In Beckett/Philosophy (75–102). Stuttgart: IBIDEM-Verlag.
• Vasalou, S. (2013). Schopenhauer and the Aesthetic Standpoint. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Waldenfels, B. (1999). The Motive of and Alien. Rus. Ed. Minsk: Propilei Publ. (In Russian)
• Žižek, S. (2008). The Parallax View. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Evropa Publ. (In Russian)