- 24 December 2024
Article/Publication Details
Views: 442
RAINER MARIA RILKE’S POETRY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF GUNTHER ANDERS AND HANNAH ARENDT AND THE CRISIS OF FUNDAMENTAL ONTOLOGY
Title in the language of publication: | ПОЭЗИЯ РАЙНЕРА МАРИЯ РИЛЬКЕ В ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИИ ГЮНТЕРА АНДЕРСА И ХАННЫ АРЕНДТ И КРИЗИС ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОЙ ОНТОЛОГИИ |
Author: | KIRILL LOSTCHEVSKY |
Issue: |
HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology. Vol. 13, №2 (2024), 475–489 |
Language: | Russian |
Document type: | Research Article |
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2024-13-2-475-489 | PDF (Downloads: 442) |
Abstract
The article examines the ontological problems posed in the work of G. Anders and H. Arendt “The Duin Elegies of Rilke”, which is considered in the context of the evolution of M. Heidegger’s philosophical ideas. In the 30s of the twentieth century, Heidegger’s philosophy underwent a significant shift associated with the transition from the construction of a phenomenologically and anthropologically oriented ontology to the thinking of being, which proceeds from its original openness and follows the guiding thread of language. The interest that the text of Anders and Arendt presents in this regard is that it can also be seen as a statement of the unproductiveness of the phenomenological method of posing and solving ontological problems, the rejection of attempts to reveal the meaning of being based on explication of the structure of human existence, and the shift of emphasis to comprehension of the essence of language and interpretation of poetic speech. In the work under study by Anders and Arendt, two plans of philosophical analysis of Rilke’s poetic text are revealed: first, arguments about poetic thinking as a way of revealing artistic and philosophical truth, and, secondly, a meaningful interpretation of the ideas that are articulated in this poetry. It is noted that Anders and Arendt’s appeal to the poetry of R. M. Rilke and the turn in Heidegger’s thinking could be dictated by similar motives: the search for promising ways to overcome the emerging crisis of the fundamental ontological program. Moreover, as a result of the research, it is suggested that the work of Anders and Arendt, published in 1930, to a certain extent outstrips and anticipates the future direction of Heidegger’s reflections, and in shifting the focus of his research interest in language and poetic creativity are realized the interpretative possibilities that were outlined by Anders and Arendt.
Keywords
ontology, Rilke, Anders, Arendt, Heidegger, overcoming metaphysics, language, poetry.
References
- Agamben, G. (2012). The Open: Man and Animal. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)
- Arendt, H. (2013). The Life of the Mind. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
- Arendt, H., & Heidegger, M. (2016). Letters: 1925–1975. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo instituta Gaidara Publ. (In Russian)
- Arendt, H., & Stern [Anders], G. (2016). Rilkes Duineser Elegien. In Schreib doch mal hard facts über Dich. Briefe 1939 bis 1975. Texte und Dokumente (105–127). München: C. H. Beck.
- Heidegger, M. (1985). Die Sprache. In Unterwegs zur Sprache (GA 12) (7–30). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
- Heidegger, M. (1991a). Country Path Conversations. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (1991b). The End of Metaphysics. In Filosofiia Martina Khaideggera i sovremennost’ (214–232). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (1993a). Dialog on Language. In Vremia i bytie (273–302). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (1993b). Letter on ‘Humanism’. In Vremia i bytie (192–220). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (1993c). The Way to Language. In Vremia i bytie (259–273). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (1993d). Time and Being. In Vremia i bytie (391–406). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (1993e). Words. In Vremia i bytie (302–312). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (1997a). Being and Time. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (1997b). Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (2003). Elucidations of Hölderlin’s Poetry. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (2009). Parmenides. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)
- Heidegger, M. (2013). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)
- Koval, O. A., & Kriukova, E. B. (2019). Gottfried Benn and Martin Heidegger on the Essence of Poetry. The Story of a Might-Have-Been Meeting. Studia Litterarum, 4 (3), 28–49. (In Russian)
- Koval, O. A., & Kriukova, E. B. (2020). “Todtnauberg” by Paul Celan: An Attempt of a Talk Between Philosophy and Poetry. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiia, 64, 196–219. (In Russian)
- Patkul, A. B. (2020). The Crisis of the Program for Building a Scientific Ontology and the Issue of “Turn” in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger. Vestnik RGGU. Seriia “Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Iskusstvovedenie”, 1, 12–25. (In Russian)
- Rilke, R. M. (1963). Werke. Auswahl in drei Bänden. Erster Band, Gedichte. Leipzig: Insel Verlag.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Social networks: