Article/Publication Details
Views: 720

TO LOSE THE MEANING OF MUSICALITY. WHAT IS THE PLACE OF MUSIC IN A WORLD SATURATED WITH AUDIO RECORDINGS?

Abstract
“Listening to music” and “listening to sound recordings” have become perfectly synonymous in our society. The aim of this paper is to question the legitimacy of this supposed equivalence, which almost all listeners have taken for granted. Our sonic universe is saturated with recorded sounds: what space does it leave to music? What reasons could justify a radical distinction, or even opposition, between the exposure to recorded sounds and musical activity in the strict sense of the word? According to tried and tested phenomenological method, through conscious attention to what appears, we return “to the matters themselves”: namely, the conditions under which sonorities can become music. After a first, introductive part reflecting the exceptional marginality of recording in mankind’s musical history, the second part of the study sketches a phenomenological description of a genuine musical process; the final part examines the consequences of sound registration with regard to such a process and to various aspects of music making and listening to music. It is thereby shown that recordings are by no means a vector of democratizing musical culture.

Keywords
acoustics, archaeo-acoustics, musical coherence, phonofixation, musical process, listening regression, musical univocity, tempo.

References

• Adorno, T. W. (2003). Über den Fetischcharakter in der Musik und die Regression des Hörens. In Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 14 (14–50). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
• Amblard, J. (2021). Les musiques obligatoires. Le Griii, 4, 19–28.
• Arbo, A. (2014). Qu’est-ce qu’un enregistrement musical(ement) véridique ? In P.-H. Frangne & H. Lacombe (Eds.), Musique et enregistrement (173–192). Rennes: PUR.
• Attali, J. (2001). Bruits. Essai sur l’économie politique de la musique. Paris: Fayard et PUF.
• Benjamin, W. (2000). L’œuvre d’art à l’époque de sa reproductibilité technique. In Œuvres III (269–316). Paris: Gallimard.
• Bogoya Gonzáles, C. (2011). Pascal Quignard : musique et poétique de la défaillance (Doctoral Thesis). Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3, Paris.
• Celibidache, S. (2012). Sur la phénoménologie de la musique. In La musique n’est rien (35–80). Arles: Actes Sud.
• Chion, M. (2017). L’art des sons fixés (3d ed.). Fontaine: Metamkine/Sono Concept. Retrieved from https://pdfcoffee.com/michel-chion-la-musique-concrete-acousmatique-un-art-des-sons-fixes-pdf-free.html.
• Chion, M. (2002). Le son (2d éd.) Paris: Nathan.
• Dauvois, M. (2005). Homo musicus palæolithicus et Palæoacustica. Munibe (Anthropologia-Arkeologia) , 57, 225–241.
• Dillard, L. K., Arunda, M. O., Lopez-Perez, L., Martinez, R., Jimenez, L., Chadha, S. (2022). Prevalence and Global Estimates of Unsafe Listening Practices in Adolescents and Young Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. BMJ Global Health, 7, e010501. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-01050.
• Lang, P. (2008). Introduction à la phénoménologie du vécu musical. Annales de phénoménologie, 7, 47–76.
• Lang, P. (2010). Cohérence et continuité musicales : une approche phénoménologique. In V. Alexandre Journeau (Ed.), Arts, langue et cohérence (123–140). Paris: L’Harmattan.
• Lang, P. (2014). Pulsation, mètre, période. Phénoménologie du vécu musical 2. Annales de phénoménologie, 13, 211–243.
• Lephay, P.-E. (2014). La prise de son et le mixage, éléments de l’interprétation : les exemples de Herbert von Karajan et [de] Glenn Gould. In P.-H. Frangne & H. Lacombe (Eds.), Musique et enregistrement (113–122). Rennes: PUR.
• Pouivet, R. (2010). Philosophie du rock. Paris: PUF.
• Stravinsky, I. (2000). Chroniques de ma vie. Paris: Denoël.