Article/Publication Details
Views: 1114

HUSSERL, AJDUKIEWICZ, AND BLAUSTEIN ON MEANING

Abstract
The aim of this article is to investigate the reception of Husserl’s theory of meaning by Ajdukiewicz and Blaustein, two members of the analytically-oriented Lvov-Warsaw School, who, in different ways, were attracted to and confronted with Husserl’s phenomenology. The discussed hypothesis is that Ajdukiewicz’s interpretation of Logical Investigations, and his original theory of meaning influenced both Blaustein’s critical reading of Husserl’s theory of intentionality and his account of meaning-intention. After outlining the central elements of “First Logical Investigation” the paper shows how it is interpreted by Ajdukiewicz in his Lvov lectures on logic and in his directival theory of meaning. What emerges is a psychological-descriptive interpretation of Husserl’s concept of meaning, and a reconsideration of his theory of intentionality within the inferential structure of beliefs in premises that motivates a person who speaks a language to believe in conclusions of a certain form. This leads Ajdukiewicz to his own original conventionalist account of meaning which is based on the identification of three main directives of meaning that represent the matrix of a given language, i.e., the grid in which each meaning finds its place. These elements allow one to demonstrate how Ajdukiewicz’s interpretation resonates in Blaustein’s critique of Husserl in his early writings, where, in addition to a psychological-descriptive reading of phenomenology we also find a conventionalist conception of meaning acts and signitive presentations. According to Blaustein, a sign can represent an object only through the conventions arising from the directives of meaning that belong to a given natural language.

Keywords
Husserl, Ajdukiewicz, Blaustein, Meaning, Phenomenology, Intentionality, Directival Theory of Meaning, Lvov–Warsaw School.

References

• Ajdukiewicz, K. (1935). Der logistische Antiirrationalismus in Polen. Erkenntnis, 5, 151–164.
• Ajdukiewicz, K. (1978). The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays (1931-1963). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
• Ajdukiewicz, K. (1993). Kategorie syntaktyczne i antynomie logiczne. Filozofia Nauki, 1 (1), 163-184.
• Ajdukiewicz, K. (2014). Wykłady Kazimierza Ajdukiewicza z semantyki logicznej w Uniwersytecie Jana Kazimierza we Lwowie w roku akademickim 1930/1931. Filozofia Nauki, 22 (1), 143–158.
• Ajdukiewicz, K. (2017). Konspekt wykładów z logiki wygłoszonych na Uniwersytecie Jana Kazimierza we Lwowie w roku akademickim 1924/1925 sporządzony przez Stefana Ołeksiuka. Filozofia Nauki, 25 (2), 137–159.
• Blaustein, L. (1928). Husserlowska nauka o akcie, treści i przedmiocie przedstawienia. Lvov: Nakładem Towarzystwa Naukowego.
• Blaustein, L. (1928/1929). Próba krytycznej oceny fenomenologii. Ruch Filozoficzny, 11, 164b–166b.
• Blaustein, L. (1931). O przedstawieniach schematycznych i symbolicznych. Badania z pogranicza psychologji i estetyki. Lvov: Nakładem Przeglądu Humanistycznego.
• Byrne, T. (2020). Ingarden’s Husserl: A Critical Assessment of the 1915 Review of the Logical Investigations. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 9 (2), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-2-513-531
• Coniglione, F. (2010). Realtà e astrazione. Scuola polacca ed epistemologia post-positivista. Roma: Bonanno.
• Dummett, M. (2014). Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Głombik, C. (2005). Die Polen und die Göttinger phänomenologische Bewegung. Husserl Studies, 21, 1–15.
• Grabarczyk, P. (2019). Directival Theory of Meaning. From Syntax and Pragmatics to Narrow Linguistic Content. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Hopp, W. (2020). Phenomenology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.
• Husserl, E. (2001). Logical Investigations. Vol. I–II (J. N. Findlay, Trans.). London and New York: Routledge.
• Ingarden, R. (1992). Einführung in die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls: Osloer Vorlesungen 1967 (GW, Bd. 4). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Lewandowski, R. (2021). Prawda, jej aspekty ontologiczne i idea intelektu nieskończonego w ‘Badaniach logicznych’ Edmunda Husserla. Roczniki Filozoficzne, 69 (4), 83–124. http://doi.org/10.18290/rf21694-5
• Maciaszek, J. (2022). Ingarden and Ajdukiewicz on Meaning. Similar Inspiration, Different Solutions. In A. Brożek & J. Jadacki (Eds.), Intuition and Analysis Roman Ingarden and the School of Kazimierz Twardowski (163–191). Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.
• Marsonet, M. (1986). Linguaggio e conoscenza. Milano: Franco Angeli.
• Mill, J. S. (1978). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Olech, A. (2015). Ajdukiewicz and Husserl on the Issue of the Meaning of Expressions. Studia Semiotyczne, XXIV, 130–154.
• Płotka, W. (2017). Early Phenomenology in Poland (1895–1945): Origins, Development, and Break Down. Studies in East European Thought, 69, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-017-9274-0
• Płotka, W. (2020a). From Psychology to Phenomenology (and Back Again): A Controversy over the Method in the School of Twardowski. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19 (1), 141–167. https://doi.org10.1007/s11097-019-09620-x
• Płotka, W. (2020b). Leopold Blaustein’s Descriptive Psychology and Aesthetics in Light of His Criticism of Husserl. In W. Płotka & P. Eldridge (Eds.), Early Phenomenology in Central and Eastern Europe: Main Figures, Ideas, and Problems (163–185). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-39623-7_10
• Płotka, W. (2021). A Critical Analysis of Blaustein’s Polemic Against Husserl’s Method. Husserl Studies, 37, 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-021-09292-z
• Płotka, W. (2023a). Ingarden and Blaustein on Image Consciousness. Studia Phaenomenologica, 23, 89–114, https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen2023235
• Płotka, W. (2023b). The Origins and Development of Leopold Blaustein’s Descriptive Psychology: An Essay in the Heritage of the Lvov–Warsaw School. History of Psychology, 26 (4), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000241
• Pokropski, M. (2015), Leopold Blaustein’s Critique of Husserl’s Early Theory of Intentional Act, Object and Content. Studia Phaenomenologica, 15, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen2015156
• Searle, J. R. (2002). Consciousness and Language. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
• Smith, D. W., & McIntyre, R. (1982). Husserl and Intentionality. A Study of Mind, Meaning and Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
• Szylewicz, A. (1993). Roman Ingarden’s Review of the Second Edition of Husserl’s ‘Logical Investigations’. Husserl Studies, 10 (1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420545
• Tugendhat, E. (1982). Traditional and Analytical Philosophy. Lectures on the Philosophy of Language (A. Gorner, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Willard, D. (1984). Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge. A Study in Husserl’s Early Philosophy. Ohio: Ohio University Press.
• Woleński, J. (1989a). Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov–Warsaw School. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Woleński, J. (1989b). The Lvov-Warsaw School and the Vienna Circle. In K. Szaniawski (Ed.), The Vienna Circle and the Lvov–Warsaw School (443–453). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Woleński, J. (2017). How to Speak About History of Analytic Philosophy. In A. Brożek, F. Stadler & J. Woleński (Eds.), The Significance of the Lvov-Warsaw School in the European Culture (15–27). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Wójcicki, R. (1999). Ajdukiewicz. Teoria znaczenia. Warsaw: Prószyński i Ska.
• Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (2018). Introduction. The School: Its Genesis, Development and Signifi Cance. In Á. Garrido & U. Wybraniec-Skardowska (Eds.), The Lvov–Warsaw School. Past and Present (3–14). Cham: Birkhäuser.
• Zahavi, D. (1992). Intentionalität und Konstitution. Eine Einführung in Husserls Logische Untersuchungen. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.