Информация о Статье/Публикации

ПРОБЛЕМАТИКА РЕАЛЬНОСТИ В СОВРЕМЕННЫХ АНТИРЕАЛИСТИЧЕСКИХ ФИЛОСОФСКИХ ТЕОРИЯХ (КРИТИЧЕСКИЙ ОБЗОР)

Аннотация
В обзорной статье анализируются работы, посвященные проблематике реальности в современных антиреалистических теориях. Целью обзора было расширение круга исследователей, включая не только представителей аналитической философии, но и феноменологической традиции, поскольку принцип феноменологической редукции соответствует общей концептуальной установке антиреалистов, а в методологическом плане феноменология более последовательно реализует программу антиреализма. На примерах разрешения «трудной проблемы сознания» в аналитической философии и развития феноменологической установки показан принцип антиреалистической философии. Такое сопряжение двух, на сегодняшний день самых респектабельных, философских школ дает возможность более точно определить вклад теоретиков обоих направлений в теорию реальности, выявить проблемные узлы, внутренние разногласия и точки пересечения идей феноменологов и представителей аналитической философии в понимании природы реальности. Работы современных исследователей проблематики реальности Ф. Бергхофера, В. Васюкова, Ю. Исихары, В. Ладова, Л. Макеевой, Р. Пилса, А. Фурсова, Д. Чалмерса и мн. др., так же как произведения Э. Гуссерля, У. Куайна, Х. Патнэма, ставшие философской классикой, позволяют с разных сторон уточнять представления о реальности, сложившиеся в антиреалистическом дискурсе. Новые исследования принципа феноменологической редукции Ю. Химанки и истоков формирования феноменологической философии Н. В. Мотрошиловой дают возможность прояснить вклад феноменологов в антиреалистическую традицию.

Ключевые слова
реальность, антиреализм, реализм, аналитическая философия, феноменология.

References

• Artemenko, N. (2008). Dictionary of Basic Terms and Concepts Used by E. Husserl in Lectures. In N. Artemenko (Trans.), Husserl E. Ideya fenomenologii: Pyat’ lektsii (215–220). Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Gumanitarnaia akademiia Publ. (In Russian)
• Austin, J. L. (1961). The Meaning of a Word. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Philosophical Papers (23–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University (J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà, Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Berghofer, Ph. (2019). Husserl’s Noetics — Towards a Phenomenological Epistemology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 50 (2), 120–138. https://doi:10.1080/00071773.2018.1525798
• Bouriau, С. (2016). Hans Vaihingers die Philosophie des Als-Ob: Pragmatismus oder Fiktionalismus? Philosophia Scientiae, 20 (1), 77–93. https://doi:10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1156
• Blokhina, N. (2019). Analytical Philosophy in the Search for Self-Determination. Filosofskii zhurnal, 12 (1), 159–170. (In Russian)
• Cerbone, D. (2017). Phenomenological Method and the Achievement of Recognition: Who’s Been Waiting for Phenomenology? In G. D’Oro & S. Overgaard (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology (295–316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Chalmers, D. (2007). Ontological Anti-Realism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology (77–129). New York, Oxford University Press.
• Chernavin, G. (2018). Incomprehensibility of the Self-Evident. St Petersburg, Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, Dobrosvet Publ. (In Russian)
• Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Fraassen, B. van. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford New York: Clarendon Press Oxford.
• Frederiksen, D., & Kringelum, L. (2020). Five Potentials of Critical Realism in Management and Organization Studies. Journal of Critical Realism, 20 (1), 18–38. https://doi:10.1080/14767430.2020.1846153
• Fursov, A. (2013). The Problem of the Status of Theoretical Knowledge of Science in the Controversy Between Realism and Anti-Realism. Moscow: Izdatel’ Vorob’ev A. V. Publ. (In Russian)
• Fursov, A. (2015). Contemporary Disputes Between Realism and Anti-Realism. In D. Dorofeev (Ed.), Filosofiia nauki (181–198). Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russian)
• Himanka, J. (2019). Reduction in Practice: Tracing Husserl’s Real-Life Accomplishment of Reduction as Evidenced by his “Idea of Phenomenology Lectures”. Phenomenology & Practice, 13 (1), 7–19. https://doi:10.29173/pandpr29371
• Husserl, E. (1999). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology (A. Mikhailov, Trans.). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Dom intellektual’noi knigi Publ. (In Russian)
• Insole, C. (2017). Realism and Anti-Realism. In W. J. Abraham & F. D. Aquino (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology (242–259). New York, Oxford University Press. https://doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662241.013.21
• Ishihara, Y. (2019). Nishida Kitarō’s Awakened Realism. Metodo. Special Issue, 1 (3), 57–84. https://doi:10.19079/metodo.s1.3.57
• Ivanov, D. (2017). Criticism of Metaphysics in the Context of Discussions on Realism and Anti-Realism. Filosofskii zhurnal, 10 (1), 35–47. https://doi:10.21146/2072-0726-2017-10-1-35-47. (In Russian)
• Kant, I. (1964). Critique of Pure Reason. Vol. 3 (N. Losskii, Trans.). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)
• Karpenko, A. (2015). In Search of Reality: Disappearance. Filosofskie nauki, 20, 36–81. (In Russian)
• Katrechko, S. (2017). Commentary to the Text by N. Motroshilova. In S. Katrechko (Ed.), Transtsendental’nyi povorot v sovremennoi filosofii (2) (74–78). Moscow: Fond TsGI, Izd-vo RGGU Publ. (In Russian)
• Kusliy, P. (2005) The Thing Itself in the Concepts of Kant and Quain. In T. Dlugach & V. Zhuchkova (Eds.), Forum molodykh kantovedov (190–200). Moscow: IFRAN Publ. (In Russian)
• Ladov, V. (2010a). Ontological Problems in Analytical Philosophy. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 1, 84–97. (In Russian)
• Ladov, V. (2010b). The Problem of Reality in Analytical Philosophy. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Politologiia, 4 (12), 30–49. (In Russian)
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. London: The university of Chicago press.
• Lektorsky, V. A., Pruzhini, B. I., Chertkova, E. L., Dubrovsky, D. I., Ivanov, D. V., Levin, G. D., Karpenko, A. S., Mamchur, E. A., Pirozhkova, S. V., Rodin, A. V., Smirnova, N. M., & Trufanova, E. O. (2017). “Realistic Turn” in Modern Epistemology, Philosophy of Consciousness and Philosophy of Science? Materials of the Round Table. Voprosy filosofii, 1, 5–38. (In Russian)
• Makeeva, L. (2011). Language, Ontology and Realism. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian)
• Makeeva, L. (2013). Analytical Philosophy, its History and Kant. Kantovskii sbornik, 2 (44), 56–68. (In Russian)
• Makhaev, M. (2015). Metaphors and Meaningless Expressions: to the Factors of the Formation of Metaphorical Problems in Analytical Philosophy. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Politologiia, 4 (32), 125–133. https://doi:10.17223/1998863Kh/32/14. (In Russian)
• Mishankina, N. (2019). Ideas About Movement in Space as an Initial Conceptual Area in Russian Metaphorical Terminology. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiia, 61, 70–97. https://doi:10.17223/19986645/61/5. (In Russian)
• Motroshilova, N. (2016). H. Vaihinger and Early Husserl: Experience Not Quite Usual Comparison. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 5 (2), 290–307. https://doi:10.18199/2226-5260-2016-5-2-290-307. (In Russian)
• Motroshilova, N. (2017). Why is it Absolutely Necessary and How Preliminary Textual Work on the Basic Concepts of “Criticism of Pure Reason” by I. Kant is Possible. In S. Katrechko (Ed.), Transtsendental’nyi povorot v sovremennoi filosofii (2): kantovskoe yavlenie, ego ontologicheskii i epistemicheskii status (68–73). Moscow: Fond TsGI, Izd-vo RGGU Publ. (In Russian)
• Ognev, A. (2012). Kant’s Theory of Reality in the Understanding and Evaluation of Hartmann. Kantovskii sbornik, 1 (39), 62–69. https://doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2012-1-7. (In Russian)
• Petrenko, M. (2020). Empirical Theory of Truth as the Ontoepistemological Basis of Cognitive Theory of Metaphor: Critical Analysis. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Politologiia, 53, 13–19. https://doi:10.17223/1998863Kh/53/2. (In Russian)
• Pils, R. (2020). Quine’s Scientific Realism Revisited. THEORIA, 86, 612–642. https://doi:10.1111/theo.12273/
• Podnieks, K. (2021). Philosophy of Modeling in 1870s: A Tribute to Hans Vaihinger. Modern Computing, 9 (1), 67–110. https://doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.13745.99684
• Putnam, H. (1977). Realism and Reason. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 50 (6), 483–498.
• Putnam, H. (2002). The Collaps of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press.
• Putnam, H. (2011). The Question of Realism. Ἑρμηνεία, 1 (3), 20–36. (In Russian)
• Quine, W. (1960). Word and Object. New York, London: The Technology Press of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Quine, W. (2003). On What there is. In V. A. Surovtsev (Ed.), From a Logical Point of View. 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays (7–23). Rus. Ed. Tomsk: Publishing House Tomsk University Publ. (In Russian)
• Rorty, R. (1997). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Rus. Ed. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Novosibirskii University Publ. (In Russian)
• Savin, A. (2016). Criticism of Naturalism and Transcendental Turn in Phenomenology (Concept of the Epoche and Reduction in Husserl’s “Idea of Phenomenology”). Vox. Filosofskii zhurnal, 12 (21), 1–12. https://doi:10.24411/2077-6608-2016-00019. (In Russian)
• Serkova, V. (2013). Method of Constructing a Historical Event in the Work of L. N. Gumilev “In Search of a Fictional Kingdom”. NTV SPbGPU Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2 (172), 88–94. (In Russian)
• Serkova, V., & Safonova, A. (2021). Biography as a Historical Problem. Voprosy istorii, 2, 146–159. https://doi:10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202102Statyi17 (In Russian)
• Schlick, M. (1934). Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis. Erkenntnis, 4, 79–99.
• Slinin, Y. (2017). Effects of Phenomenological Reduction. Vestnik SPbGU. Filosofiia i konfliktologiia, 33 (4), 490–527. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.410. (In Russian)
• Spiegelberg, H. (2002). The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction (M. Lebedev & O. Nikiforov, Trans.). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Logos Publ. (In Russian)
• Spurret, D. (2008). Why I am not an Analytic Philosopher. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27 (2), 153–163.
• Trufanova, E. (2017). Elusive Reality and Social Constructs. Filosofiia nauki i tekhniki, 22 (1), 61–77. (In Russian)
• Vasilyev, V. (2009). A Difficult Problem of Consciousness. Moscow: Progress-Tradi Publ. (In Russian)
• Vasilyev, V. (2019). Metaphilosophy: History and Prospects. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 56 (2), 6–18. https://doi:10.5840/eps201956222 (In Russian)
• Vasyukov, V. (1999). Formal Phenomenology. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
• Vasyukov, V. (2010). Virtual Objects, Intentional Objects, and Possible Worlds. In E. Dragalina-Chernaya (Ed.), Vozmozhnye miry. Semantika, ontologiia, metafizika (120–137). Moscow: Kanon+ Publ. (In Russian)
• Yampolskaya, A. (2017). Phenomenological Reduction as a Technique. Voprosy filosofii, 2, 195–205. (In Russian)