Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 1083


VASILI SESEMAN’S TRANSCENDENTAL THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE: BETWEEN PHENOMENOLOGY AND NEO-KANTIANISM

Title in the language of publication: ТРАНСЦЕНДЕНТАЛЬНАЯ ТЕОРИЯ ПОЗНАНИЯ ВАСИЛИЯ СЕЗЕМАНА: МЕЖДУ ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЕЙ И НЕОКАНТИАНСТВОМ
Author: ANNA SHIYAN
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 170-189
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-170-189 PDF (Downloads: 1386)

Abstract
The article considers the theory of cognition of the Russian and Soviet philosopher Vasily Seseman (1884-1963) in its relation to the main philosophical orientations in early 20th-century: phenomenology, neokantianism, and intuitionism. Seseman’s theory of cognition is interesting today because, following the tradition of neo-Kantianism, it largely shares the principles and methods of phenomenology, poses epistemological problems that were not explicitly formulated by Edmund Husserl, and offers solutions that are relevant today. The article highlights a common thematic field combining phenomenology, neo-Kantianism, and intuitionism. This field is set by the initial subject-object cognitive attitude, the desire to identify the conditions for the possibility of cognition, the recognition of the presence of a non-linguistic level of knowledge. Moving in this unified theoretical cognitive context of the early twentieth century, Seseman offers his own solution to the following problems: defining the subject of cognition, developing the method of intuition in general and in relation to the contemplation of essence, distinguishing between objective and non-objective attitudes and using this distinction to describe different types of cognition, thematizing the irrational in cognition, and understanding the judgment and its role in the final formation of cognition. Seseman believes that the cognition of reality is preceded by the perception of its objects. He diverges from the Neo-Kantians, who claim that the objects of cognition are formed only in judgment, and holds a position than Husserl, according to whom we perceive the world around us already objectively. However, unlike Husserl, Seseman does not recognize the cognitive nature of perception and argues that knowledge begins with a reflexive fixation of the object of cognition. The cognition of an individual object is embodied in a judgment in which the relation of the object to its environment is fixed and the object is defined as a unique combination of universal properties. Finally, it is shown that the solution of epistemological questions inevitably leads Seseman to ontological issues.

Keywords
transcendentalism, phenomenology, neo-Kantianism, theory of cognition, subject of cognition, given consciousness, judgment, essence, Seseman.

References

  • Anilionytė, L., & Lozuraitis, A. (2000) The Life of Vosylius Sezemanas and His Critical Realism. In J. Baranova (Ed.), Lithuanian Philosophy: Personas and Ideas (187–200). Washington: Council for Research in Values & Philosophy.
  • Belov, V. (2012). Sezeman—a Taxonomist of Russian Neo-Kantianism. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 121–126. (In Russian)
  • Belov, V. (2017). Modern Studies of the Work of Vasily Sezeman Abroad. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (2), 411–424. (In Russian)
  • Botz-Bornstein, T. (2006). Vasily Sesemann Experience, Formalism and the Question of Being. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
  • Chardybon, B. (2015). Philosophy of Vasily Sesemann and Marburg Neo-Kantianism. Kantovskiy sbornik, 3 (53), 66–85. (In Russian)
  • Dmitriyeva, N. (2007). Russian Neo-Kantianism: “Marburg” in Russia. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (2009). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (2018). The Idea of Phenomenology. Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (1985). Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesungen 1906/1907. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1992). Erfahrung und Urteil. Hamburg: Meiner.
  • Husserl, E. (1995). Logik und allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie. Vorlesungen 1917/1918. Den Haag: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Husserl, E. (2001). Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesung 1902/1903. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Ingarden, R. (1999). Introduction to the Husserl Phenomenology. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Dom intellektual’noy knigi Publ. (In Russian)
  • Jonkus, D. (2015). Phenomenological Approaches to Self-Consciousness and the Unconscious (Moritz Geiger and Vasily Seseman). Studia Phenomenologica, XV, 225–237.
  • Jonkus, D. (2017). The Philosophy of Vasily Seseman: Neo-Kantianism, Intuitionism and Phenomenology. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (1), 79-96. (In Russian)
  • Jonkus. D. (2015). Vosyliaus Sezemano filosofija: savees pazxinimo ir estetinexs patirties fenomenologija. Vilnius: Versus Aureus.
  • Rickert, G. (1913). Two Ways of the Theory of Cognition. Novye Idei v Filosofii, 7, 1–79. (In Russian)
  • Rickert, G. (1925). The Problem of Idealism in Philosophy. Rus. Ed. Logos, 1, 109–173. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (1911). Rational und irrational im System der Philosophie. Logos, 1, 93–122. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (1925). Review of the Book by N. Hartmann “The Main Features of the Metaphysics of Cognition”. Logos, 1, 229–235. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (1927). Rationales und irrationales. In Studien zum Erkenntnisproblem II (129-192). Kaunas: Valstybes Spaustuve.
  • Seseman, V. (1932). Die logischen Gesetze und das Sein. Sonderbruck aus „Eranos“ II. Heft. Kaunas.
  • Seseman, V. (2010). Ethics of Plato and the Problem of Evil. Kantovskiy sbornik, 1 (13), 75–89. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2011). The Real Attitude and the “Pure” (Attitudeless) Knowledge. From the Manuscript Heritage. Kantovskii sbornik, 2 (36), 83–89. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2012). Das Problem des Idealismus in der Philosophie. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 127–133. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2013) Aesthetics I. Kant. In V. Belov & L. Tetyuyev (Eds.), Filosofiya Kanta i osnovaniya prakticheskoy filosofii (75-89). Rus. Ed. Saratov: Novyy proyekt. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2017). Manuscripts. Scheler, Lossky, Bergson (1950–1955). Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (1), 201–210. (In Russian)
  • Shiyan, A. (2019). The Project of the Descriptive Metaphysics of Edmund Husserl: Cognitive Consciousness and the Problems of Cognition. In S. Katrechko & A. Shiyan (Eds.), Transtsendental’nyy povorot v sovremennoy filosofii (4): transtsendental’naya metafizika, epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, teologiya i filosofiya soznaniya (194–203). Moscow: GAUGN–Press, Fond TSGI. (In Russian)
  • Sverdiolas, A. (2010). Vasily Seseman: The Other and Time. In M. Drunga & L. Donskis (Eds.), Vasily Seseman: Selected Papers (15-33). Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
  • Yakovenko, B. (2000). What is Philosophy? (Introduction to Transcendentalism). In A. Yermichev (Ed.), Moshch’ filosofii (91-164). St Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)