Article/Publication Details
Views: 1238

PHENOMENOLOGY OF POLITICAL ACTION

Abstract
The article focuses on a phenomenological study of political action. The analysis includes three directions: the concept of action, paradigms that determine political actions, and the purpose of action. In the analysis of action, I first use the distinction between the concepts of “act” and “operate.” “To act” means a conscious, deliberate, rational action. In contrast, “operate” means to behave unconsciously, mechanically or automatically, passively or instinctively. The political implications of the distinction between an “acting” and “operating” person can be formulated in the terms “freedom of action” and “coercion to operate,” and the latter can be used as a criterion for determining the type of social system, as well as for evaluating the correlated psychological state of society. As the next step, I analyse the action as a process and a result. I argue that in the social sphere, action appears as the sum of these moments, and the social sphere is a derivate of action. The last aspect of the analysis of action is responsibility. I claim that responsibility can be interpreted as the awareness and recognition by the individual of her role in history. The second part of the work is the study of paradigms and rules of political action in so-called open and closed societies. I claim that political action within the framework of an open society is limited only by legislation. In a closed society, political action is practically impossible: citizens do not act, but “operate” since there are no conditions for actions. After that, I analyse the role of social myths as a factor affecting people’s political activities. In the last part, I analyse the ultimate goal of political action. Traditionally, political philosophy assumes that the goals of politics are exhausted by the problems of relationship between the state and the individual. However, based on the theory of Hannah Arendt, it is possible to formulate the task of political action as the achievement of humanism in a human being, taken not in her relation to the state but in relation to herself. I argue that the minimal political action that can be qualified as humanism consists of the ability and courage to use one’s own mind.

Keywords
political action, act, operate, responsibility, paradigms of action, social myth, purpose of action, humanism.

References

• Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Oxford University Press.
• Arendt, H. (2013). Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. In Zhizn’ uma (469–487). Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
• Bakhtin, M. (2003). Toward a Philosophy of the Act. In Sobranie sochinenii. Vol. 1 (7–68). Moscow: Iazyki slovianskoi kul’tury Publ. (In Russian)
• Cohen, H. (1981). Ethik des reinen Willens. Werke. Bd. 7. Hildesheim, New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
• Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press.
• Goldman, A. I. (1970). A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Heidegger, M. (1993) Letter on Humanism. In Vremja i bytie (192–220). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Resbublika Publ. (In Russian)
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2001). Signs. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Isskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)
• Pechriggl, A. (2018). Agieren und Handeln: Studien zu einer philosophisch-psychoanalytischen Handlungstheorie. Bielefeld: Transcript.
• Popper, K. (1992). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Kul’turnaya iniciativa, Feniks Publ. Retrieved from https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/3912 (In Russian)
• Soboleva, M. (2011). The Truth of Action in Bakhtnis’s Philosophy. In N. Plotnikov (Ed.), Diskursy spravedlivosti v russkoi intellektual’noi tradicii (185–195). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Klyutch. (In Russian)
• Soboleva, M. (2019). The Logic of Evil. An Alternative Introduction to Philosophy. St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)
• Thompson, M. (2008). Life and Action. Massachusetts University Press.
• Wright von, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.