Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 1173


LUIS AGUIAR DE SOUSA, ANA FALCATO (ED.)
PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO INTERSUBJECTIVITY AND VALUES
London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019. ISBN (10): 1-5275-3482-0, (13): 978-1-5275-3482-7

Title in the language of publication: LUIS AGUIAR DE SOUSA, ANA FALCATO (ED.)
PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO INTERSUBJECTIVITY AND VALUES
London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019. ISBN (10): 1-5275-3482-0, (13): 978-1-5275-3482-7
Author: ALEKSEY SIDOROV
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 455-465
Language: English
Document type: Review
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-455-465 PDF (Downloads: 1375)

Abstract
The review is devoted to a joint monograph of Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity and Values published in 2019. The peculiarity and novelty of this monograph is that it is devoted not so much to the cognitive and epistemological aspects of phenomenology of intersubjectivity as to ethical, existential and value problems of relations with the Others, presented in various phenomenological concepts. One of the advantages of the work is the pluralistic approach, which allows the reader to get acquainted with the solutions to the problem of intersubjectivity posed by a number of the most prominent phenomenologists, i. e. Husserl, Scheler, Heidegger, Sartre, Marcel, Levinas and others. The book traces the idea that emerging of the topic of intersubjectivity in phenomenology caused a socio-ethical and axiological shift in the phenomenological movement. Considering moving of modern philosophy towards “the intersubjective paradigm” (W. Hösle), the aim of the authors of the monograph to show the relevance and innovation of phenomenology in discussing the problems of the Other, communication and ethics can be assessed as a promising theoretical project. Whereas critics of the phenomenological movement reproached “methodological solipsism” of phenomenology, which develops Cartesian-Kantian subjectivism, a serious analysis of the works of the most prominent representatives of the phenomenological tradition leads the authors of the monograph to the conclusion that a phenomenological subject is social in its essence. The review draws a conclusion that the joint monograph brings into sharp focus that phenomenology is in possession of deep and diverse ways of studying the common being of people and collectively shared values.

Keywords
intersubjectivity, phenomenology, value, ethics, Husserl, Scheler, Heidegger, Sartre, Levinas.

References

  • Apel, K.-O. (2001). The Transformation of Philosophy. Rus. Ed. Moscow. Logos Publishers, 2001. (In Russian)
  • De Sousa, L. A., & Falcato, A. (2019). Introduction. Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity and Values (L. A. de Sousa & A. Falcato, Eds.). London. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Habermas, J. (2001). On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction (B. Fultner, Trans.). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
  • Hösle, V. (1990). An Interview. Questions of Philosophy, 11, 107-113.
  • Husserl, E. (1981). Syllabus of a Course of Four Lectures on “Phenomenological Method and Phenomenological Philosophy”. In E. Husserl (Ed.), Shorter Works (67-74). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Husserl, E. (2004). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)
  • Levinas, E. (2000). Totality and Infinity. In Izbranniye raboty (66-291). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga Publ. (In Russian)
  • Levinas, E. (2006). God and Philosophy. In Emmanuel Levinas: Put’ k drugomu (203-232). Rus. Ed. St Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo SPbGU Publ. (In Russian)
  • Loidolt, S. (2017). Value, Freedom, Responsibility: Central Themes in Phenomenological Ethics. In D. Zahavi (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook for the History of Phenomenology (696-716). London. Oxford University Press.
  • Motroshilova, N. V. (1992). Vittorio Hösle: Sketches for a Philosophical Portrait. In Vittorio Hyosle: nabroski k filosofskomu portretu (171-217). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
  • Vattimo, G. (2002). The Transparent Society. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Logos Publ. (In Russian)
  • Welz, C. (2016). Trauma, Memory, Testimony. Phenomenological, Psychological and Ethical Perspectives. In R. Illman & B. Dahla (Eds.), Jewish Studies in the Nordic Countries Today (104-133). Turku. The Donner Institute, Åbo Akademi.
  • Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond Empathy. Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 5-7.