Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 1179


V. SESEMAN’S “PURE KNOWLEDGE” CONCEPT

Title in the language of publication: КОНЦЕПТ «ЧИСТОГО ЗНАНИЯ» В. СЕЗЕМАНА
Author: VLADIMIR BELOV
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 11, №1 (2021), 190-207
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-1-190-207 PDF (Downloads: 1379)

Abstract
Although the concept of “pure knowledge” is one of the most interesting and singular concepts in the philosophical work of Vasily Seseman (1884-1963), it can only be presented after a comprehensive analysis of the philosopher’s numerous works devoted to ontological, epistemological and logical problems. Seseman believes that the main philosophical trends at the beginning of the twentieth century, namely neo-Kantianism, intuitionism and phenomenology, could not present this concept, although they did try. According to the philosopher, the main reason for the inability of neo-Kantianism, intuitionism and phenomenology to start talking about pure knowledge is their inability to assert the essential difference between objective and non-objective knowledge. Sesemann pays special attention when substantiating his concept of “pure knowledge” to the difference between his approach and that of the founder of modern phenomenology. The philosopher points out that even Husserl, who concentrated attention on the specifics of inner experience, puts this specific, in the end, in dependence on the process of cognition and reflection, completely ignoring its ontological foundations. While pure knowledge, according to Seseman, is neither non-objective, nor objective knowledge, nor non-objective, nor objective being, it, in fact, is non-knowledge and non-being. It is precisely this understanding by the philosopher of this phenomenon that allows him to characterize pure knowledge as premiseless and limitless and, in general, as free from any ontological or epistemological determinations. However, on the other hand, Sesemann insists that the phenomenon of pure knowledge has the meaning of not just a regulatory idea, an infinitely distant ideal, but also a real constitutive meaning, as a principle that reveals and determines the human striving for knowledge as an interconnected and necessary process that ascends from the onto-gnoseological stage of non-objective knowledge to the epistemological, and then the logical stage of objective knowledge.

Keywords
Seseman, pure knowledge, attitude, phenomenology, intuitionism, experience, phenomenon, objective and non-objective knowledge.

References

  • Belov, V. N. (2012). V.E. Sezeman Is a Systematist of Russian Neo-Kantianism. Voprosi filosofii, 4, 121–127. (In Russian)
  • Belov, V. N. (2017). Contemporary Studies of Vasily Sezeman’s Creativity Abroad. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (2), 411–424. (In Russian)
  • Belov, V. N. (2019). N. Hartmann and W. Sesemann. Preface to the Translation of N. Hartmann’s Review “On Wilhelm Sesemann”. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 8 (1), 311–317. (In Russian)
  • Florensky, P. A. (1990). Imeslavie as a Philosophical Prerequisite. In U vodorazdelov mysli. Vol. 2 (281-321). Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russian)
  • Hartmann, N., Belov, V., & Belousov, M. (2019). On Wilhelm Sesemann. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 8 (1), 318–327. (In Russian)
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Science of Logic. Vol. 1. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Misl’ Publ. (In Russian)
  • Jakovenko, B. V. (2000). Critical Notes on Phenomenology. In Antologija fenomenologicheskoj filosofii v Rossii. Vol. 2 (242-253). Moscow: Logos, Progress-Tradition Publ. (In Russian)
  • Jonkus, D. (2015). Vosyliaus Sezemano filosofija: savees pazxinimo ir estetinexs patirties fenomenologija. Vilnius: Versus Aureus.
  • Jonkus, D. (2017). The Philosophy of Vasily Sesemann: Neo-Kantianism, Intuitivism and Phenomenology. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (1), 79–96. (In Russian)
  • Losskii, N. (1929). Die intellektuelle Anschauung als Methode der Philosophie. Der Russische Gedanke. Internationale Zeitschrift für russische Philosophie, Literaturwissenschaft und Kultur, 1, 4–17.
  • Seseman, V. (1927a). Beiträge zur Erkentnissproblem. I. Über gegenständliches und ungegenständliches Wissen. In Lietuvos universiteto. Humanitariniu fakulteto raštai. Kn. 2 (69-142). Kaunas.
  • Seseman, V. (1927b). Studien zum Erkenntnisproblem. Rationales und irrationales. In Lietuvos universiteto. Humanitariniu fakulteto raštai (127-192). Kaunas.
  • Seseman, V. (1935). Zum Problem der logischen Paradoxien. In Eranus (5-85). Kaunas.
  • Seseman, V. (2000). Notes on the Problems of Cognition: on Subject and Non-Objective Knowledge. In Antologija fenomenologicheskoj filosofii v Rossii. Vol. 2 (268-279). Moscow: Logos, Progress-Tradition Publ. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2006). On the Problem of Pure Knowledge (V. N. Belov, Trans.). Logos, 6, 119-162. (In Russian)
  • Seseman, V. (2007). To the Problem of Cognition. In M. A. Kolerov & N. S. Plotnikov (Eds.), Issledovanija po istorii russkoj misli: Echegodnik za 2004-2005 god (234-248). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Modest Kolerov Publ. (In Russian)
  • Sesemann, V. (2011). The Real Attitude and the “Pure” (Attitudeless) Knowledge. From the Manuscript Heritage. Kantovskii sbornik, 2 (36), 83–89. (In Russian)