Article/Publication Details
Views: 1154

ARGUING FOR THE “DESTRUCTION” OF THE A PRIORI. THE PROMPTS FROM HUSSERLIAN PHENOMENOLOGY

Abstract
This article argues against the concept of a priori and essence as they have been traditionally thematized in the course of the old metaphysical-idealist tradition. Specifically, I argue against the existence of an ontological a priori, often endowed with metaphysical-platonic connotations, by attempting to “relocate” it in the subjective sphere and thus reduce it to the being and modes of being of a transcendental subjectivity. To do so, I will be appealing to a phenomenological, Husserlian approach, while pointing to a possible connection with the Kantian views on the matter and also taking into account certain views in the secondary literature. Since a substantial part of my position is associated with the notion of a constituting, transcendental subjectivity further reducible to the origin of inner temporality, I intend to show that the objectivity constraints put in this way on the conception of the transcendental a priori may ultimately lead to a “destruction” of its traditional ontological sense. Given that in transcendental phenomenology the concept of a priori “appears” both in the constituting and the constituted level, I aim to show that it is precisely in this context that the a priori cannot rid itself of the vestiges of factuality brought in by means of the very constitutive, subjective processes implying ipso facto the question of the role of the constituting origin of temporality.

Keywords
constitutive a priori; constituting subjectivity; endless regression; inner temporality; reflective ego; transcendental a priori; transcendental subjectivity.

References

• Anthony, L. (2004). A Naturalized Approach to the A Priori. Philosophical Issues, 14, 1-17.
• Bealer, G. (1999). A Theory of the A Priori. Philosophical Perspectives, 1, 29-55.
• De Palma, V. (2014). Die Fakta leiten alle Eidetik. Zu Husserls Begriff des materialen Apriori. Husserl Studies, 30, 195-223.
• Dufrenne, M. (2009). The Notion of the A Priori. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Eley, L. (1962). Die Krise des Apriori in der Transzendentalen Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Heidegger, M. (1976). Von Wesen des Grundes. In F-W. von Herrmann (Ed.), Wegmarken (123-175). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
• Husserl, E. (1956). Erste Philosophie, Erster Teil (Hua VII). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1969). Formal und Transcendental Logic (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Husserl, E. (1971). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie (Hua V). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1973). Experience and Judgment (J. S. Churchill & K. Americs, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan P.
• Husserl, E. (1975). Introduction to the Logical Investigations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1976a). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie (Hua III/I). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1976b), Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phanomenologie (Hua VI). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1982). Cartesian Meditations (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First Book (F. Kersten, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1984). Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie (Hua XXIV). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1991). On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (J. B. Brough, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1996). Logik und Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie (Hua XXX). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Husserl, E. (2001). Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewußtsein (1917/18) (Hua XXXIII). Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Pub.
• Husserl, E. (2006). Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution, Die C-Manuscripte (Hua VIII). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Husserl, E. (2008). Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge, Lectures 1906/07 (C. Ortiz Hill, Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Husserl, E. (2012). Zur Lehre vom Wesen und zur Methode der eidetischen Variation (Hua XLI). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Husserl, E. (2019a). First Philosophy — Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920-1925) (S. Luft & T. M. Naberhaus, Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V.
• Husserl, E. (2019b). Logic and General Theory of Science (C. Ortiz Hill, Trans.). Cham: Springer Nature.
• Hill Ortiz, C. (2009). Husserl and Phenomenology, Experience and Essence. In A-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta Husserliana, vol. 103 (9-22). Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
• Hill Ortiz, C. (2013). The Strange Worlds of Actual Consciousness and the Purely Logical. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, XIII, 62-83.
• Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (P. Guyer & A. Wood, Eds., Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Livadas, S. (2020). Husserl’s Sachhaltigkeit and the Question of the Essence of Individuals. International Philosophical Quarterly, 60, 4 (240), 449-471.
• Majolino, C. (2016). “Until the End of the World": Eidetic Variation and Absolute Being of Consciousness — A Reconsideration. Research in Phenomenology, 46 (2), 157-183.
• Mohanty, N. J. (1974). ‘Life World’ and ‘A priori’ in Husserl’s Later Thought. In A-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), The Phenomenological Realism of the Possible Worlds, Analecta Husserliana, vol. 3 (46-65). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.
• Moran, D. (2014). What Does Heidegger Mean by the Transcendence of Dasein? International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 22 (4), 491-514.
• Murphy, T. R. (1974). The Transcendental A Priori in Husserl and Kant. In A-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), The Phenomenological Realism of the Possible Worlds, Analecta Husserliana, vol. 3 (66-79). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.
• Patočka, J. (1992). Introduction à la phénomènologie de Husserl. Grenoble: Ed. Millon.
• Romano, C. (2015). At the Heart of Reason (M. B. Smith & C. Romano, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern Univ. Press.
• Schroeter, L. (2006). Against A Priori Reductions. The Philosophical Quarterly, 56 (225), 562-586.
• Smith Woodruff, D. (2004). Mind World. Essays in Phenomenology and Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sowa, R. (2016). Eidos und A Priori: Husserls ontologische Konzeption des Apriori. Discipline Filosophiche, A. XXVI (1), 9-45.
• Tidman, P. (1996). The Justifications of A Priori Intuitions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LVI (1), 161-171.
• Turri, J. (2011). Contingent A Priori Knoweledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXXXIII (2), 327-344.
• Zahavi, D. (2022). From No Ego to Pure Ego to Personal Ego. In H. Jacobs (Ed.), The Husserlian Mind (269-279). Oxon: Routledge.