Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 2151


PHENOMENOLOGY WITHOUT EGOLOGY: EDITH STEIN AS AN ORIGINAL PHENOMENOLOGICAL THINKER

Title in the language of publication: PHENOMENOLOGY WITHOUT EGOLOGY: EDITH STEIN AS AN ORIGINAL PHENOMENOLOGICAL THINKER
Author: TIMOTHY BURNS
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 10, №2 (2021), 463-483
Language: English
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2021-10-2-463-483 PDF (Downloads: 1716)

Abstract
Edith Stein is considered a leading figure in the early phenomenological movement and the disciple who performed in the best way the phenomenological method proposed by Husserl, and yet her relationship to phenomenology remains unclear in the literature. This article seeks to add clarity to her relationship to phenomenology while considering three inescapably related questions. (1) What did Stein conceive phenomenology to be? (2) How should we understand Husserl’s influence on Stein? (3) Was Stein an original phenomenological thinker? I argue that Stein conceives of phenomenology as an epistemological critique that aims to clarify the essential foundations of knowledge. It involves intentional analysis that proceeds by way of essential-seeing (Wesensschau), which can be brought about through the method of free imaginative variation, and its intentional analysis involves close attention to the relationship between meaning-intention and meaning-fulfillment. I argue that the primary influence Husserl exerts on Stein is in the development of phenomenology as conceived in his Logical Investigations. Finally, I offer an understanding of how Stein conceived of her differences with Husserl on the issue of idealism in order to argue that Stein’s phenomenological writings in On the Problem of Empathy and “Sentient Causality” offer us a novel phenomenological account of the human being that begins with the ego but escapes being a mere egology. Edith Stein’s phenomenology of the human person begins with the ego and its experiences, and yet, she identifies within those experiences a certain kind of extra-egoic content, viz. experiences of my sentient states.

Keywords
Edith Stein, Edmund Husserl, Phenomenology, Realist Phenomenology, Göttingen Circle, Early Phenomenology, Sentience, Lifepower.

References

  • Ales Bello, A. (2002). Edith Stein’s Contribution to Phenomenology. In A. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Phenomenology World-Wide: Foundations—Expanding Dynamics—Life Engagements. A Guide for Research and Study (232-240). Dordrecht & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Collins, J. (1942). Edith Stein and the Advance of Phenomenology. Thought: Fordham University Quarterly, 17 (4), 685-708.
  • Drummond, J. (2008). Historical Dictionary of Husserl’s Philosophy. New Jersey: Scarecrow Press.
  • Hughes, J. (1985). Edith Stein’s Doctoral Thesis on Empathy and the Philosophical Context From Which it Emerged. Theresianum, 36 (2), 455-84.
  • Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book (F. Kersten, Trans.). Dordrecht & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Dordrecht & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Husserl, E. (1999). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (D. Cairns, Trans.). Dordrecht & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Husserl, E. (2001). Logical Investigations, Vol. 1-2 (D. Moran, Ed.; J. N. Findlay, Trans.). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Ingarden, R. (1962). Edith Stein on Her Activity as an Assistant of Edmund Husserl. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 23 (2), 155-175.
  • Luft, S. (2005). Husserl’s Concept of the “Transcendental Person”: Another Look at the Husserl-Heidegger Relationship. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 13 (2), 141-177.
  • Moran, D. (2005). The Meaning of Phenomenology in Husserl’s Logical Investigations. In G. Banham (Ed.), Husserl and the Logic of Experience (8-37). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Moran, D. (2018). What is the Phenomenological Approach? Revisiting Intentional Explication. Phenomenology and Mind, 15, 72-90.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1967). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (E. G. Ballard & L. E. Embree, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  • Spiegelberg, H. (1994). The Phenomenological Movement. Dordrecht & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Stein, E. (1986). Life in a Jewish Family: Her Unfinished Autobiographical Account (L. Gelber & R. Leuven, Eds.; J. Koeppel, Trans.). Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.
  • Stein, E. (1989). On the Problem of Empathy (W. Stein, Trans.). Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.
  • Stein, E. (2000). Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities (M. C. Baseheart & M. Sawicki, Trans.). Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.
  • Stein, E. (2014). Edith Stein Self Portrait in Letters: Letters to Roman Ingarden (M. A. Neyer OCD, Ed.; H. C. Hunt, Trans.). Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.