Article/Publication Details
Views: 2147

TEMPORALITY AS A SPATIAL FIELD OF PRESENCE

Abstract
According to Merleau-Ponty in his Phenomenology of Perception, we experience time as a “field of presence.” In his words, “It is in my ‘field of presence’ in the widest sense […] that I make contact with time, and learn to know its course.” This field is fundamental. It elucidates my spatial apprehension. In his words: “Perception provides me with a ‘field of presence’ in the broad sense, extending in two dimensions: the here-there dimension and the past-present-future dimension. The second elucidates the first.” In other words, I understand the spatial “here-there” dimension in terms of the temporal dimension. The “there” is what I immediately grasp in still having in hand “the immediate past.” In this article, I propose to examine the general conception of time as a field of presence. This examination can be seen as a kind of “thought experiment,” where we see what happens when we reverse this relation—i.e., when we elucidate the “past-present-future dimension” in terms of the “here-there dimension.” Such a reversal, I will argue, brings to the fore the pragmatic, spatial character of lived time. Not only does it bring about a revision of horizonal structure of the field of presence, it also has consequences for psycho-analytical research.

Keywords
spatiality, field of presence, temporality, perception, Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, Heidegger.

References

• Aristotle. (1993). Physics. In J. Westphal & C. Levenson (Eds.), Time (60-72). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
• Augustine. (1993). Book XI. In J. Westphal & C. Levenson (Eds.), Time (6-28). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
• Bernet, R. (1985). Einleitung. In R. Bernet (Ed.), Edmund Husserl, Texte zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893-1917) (Hua X). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
• Canales, J. (2015). The Physicist and the Philosopher, Einstein, Bergson, and the Debate that Changed our Understanding of Time. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Chatham, C. (2007). Lacking More Than Foresight: Do Children Even Comprehend Time? Developing Intelligence. Retrieved from https://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2007/04/19/predicting-the-future-do-child
• Cosentino, S. (2018). Children and the Concept of Time. Mother for Life. Retrieved from https://www.motherforlife.com/child/3-to-5-years-old/development/learnings/5733-children-and-the-concept-of-time.thtml
• Forman, H. (2015). Events And Children’s Sense of Time: A Perspective on the Origins of Everyday Timekeeping. Frontiers of Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356002
• Freud, S. (1961). Beyond the Pleasure Principle (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Freud, S. (1965). A General Introduction to Psycho-Analysis (J. River, Trans.). New York: Washington Square Press.
• Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper Collins.
• Heidegger, M. (1967). Sein und Zeit. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Heidegger, M. (1985). History of the Concept of Time (T. Kisiel, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Hume, D. (1973). A Treatise of Human Nature (L. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Husserl, E. (1962). Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie (W. Biemel, Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1963). Cartesianische Meditationen (S. Strasser, Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1966). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (R. Boehm, Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch (R. Schuhmann, Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1991). The Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893-1917) (John Brough, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (2002). Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929-1934), Die C-Manuskripte (D. Lohmar, Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Kant, I. (1963). Critique of Pure Reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). London: Macmillan and Company.
• Ligrone, R. (2019). Biological Innovations that Built the World: A Four-billion-year Journey through Life & Earth History. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Locke, J. (1995). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Librairie Gallimard.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge.
• Sachs, O. (1993). To See and Not to See. The New Yorker, 10, 59-73.
• Sachs, O. (1996). An Anthropologist from Mars, Seven Paradoxical Tales. New York: Vintage Press.
• Weiss, H. (2018). Erwartung und unbewusste Phantasie. Kontroverse oder Begegnung zwischen Psychoanalyse und Philosophie? In E. Angehrn & J. Küchenhoff (Eds.), Erwartung. Zukunft zwischen Furcht und Hoffnung (228-244). Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
• Weiss, H. (2019). Ist Umkehrbarkeit eine Illusion? Gedanken zum ‚Reversibilitätsprinzip‘ von Henry Rey. In H. Weiß & E. Horn (Eds.), Zeitlose seelische Zustände (115-139). Frankfurt am Main: Brandes & Apsel.