Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 2139


HEIDEGGER'S BEING, RAHNER'S GOD: IS THE QUESTION STILL RELEVANT OR ALREADY ANSWERED?

Title in the language of publication: HEIDEGGERS SEIN, RAHNERS GOTT — NOCH IMMER AKTUELLE FRAGE ODER FÄLLIG GEWORDENE ANTWORT?
Author: RIHARDS KŪLIS
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 10, №1 (2021), 108-122
Language: German
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2021-10-1-108-122 PDF (Downloads: 1639)

Abstract
The secularized and rational-oriented mindset of the Western civilization does not preclude important elements of a religious worldview. The objective of the present study is to come to understand the role the categories of Being and God play in the present day spiritual situation. Heidegger’s and Rahner’s views are considered here within the prospective of the paradigmatic process. The latter marks the fading away of the classical understanding of God and search for new and divine meanings. Therefore I suggest considering some of the most significant motifs in the two philosophers’ reflection as regards the history of western civilization and our epoch in the context of the categories of God and Being. Among these motifs there are such attitudes as subjectivism, self-suggestion, disposal of beings, planetarism, oblivion of Being, loss of origins, groundlessness, alienation, situation of meaninglessness. It is due to these attitudes, especially owing to meaninglessness, that many people tend to raise again the issue of the concealed, the encompassing, God or Being. Or perhaps speaking about “Being” and “God” can be interpreted as something that leads to the oblivion of Being and to atheism. “Being” in Heidegger and “God” in Rahner single out the existential centre to which forms of life are related. Nowadays it is forgotten or even vanishes. “God” or “Being” hold everything together and confer meaning thereto. Could it be exactly what modern man is in search of? One has to find answers to these questions.

Keywords
being, God, “the fate of being,” concealed, encompassing, subjectivism, self-suggestion, disposal of beings, groundlessness, meaninglessness.

References

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1983). Heideggers Wege. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  • Habermas, J. (1994). Die Moderne — ein unvollendetes Projekt. Leipzig: Reclam.
  • Habermas, J. (1998). Die postnationale Konstellation und die Zukunft der Demokratie. In Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Habermas, J. (2005). Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion: Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Heidegger, M. (1976). Nur noch ein Gott kann uns retten. Der Spiegel, 23, 193.
  • Heidegger, M. (1977). Holzwege (GA 5). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2004). Brief über den Humanismus (GA 9). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2005). Wissenschaftlicher Beweis und Denken (GA 15). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2014). Überlegungen XII — XV (Schwarze Hefte 1939 — 1941) (GA 96). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm v. (2002). Wahrheit — Freiheit — Geschichte. Frankfurt / M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Rahner, K. (1966). Experiment Mensch. In Die Frage nach dem Menschen. Freiburg / München: Karl Alber.
  • Rahner, K. (1984). Grundkurs des Glaubens. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.
  • Safranski, R. (1997). Ein Meister aus Deutschland. Heidegger und seine Zeit. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer Taschenbuch.
  • Vietta, S. (2015). „Etwas rast um den Erdball ... “. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.