Article/Publication Details
Views: 2154

EMPATHY AND EMOTIONAL COEXPERIENCING IN THE AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE

Abstract
After briefly remarking on previous treatments of empathy in the philosophical and psychological literature, I outline Stein’s treatment of this concept in On the Problem of Empathy and Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities, illustrating the problematic breadth of her application of the term ‘empathy,’ a breadth that Stein herself calls to our attention. After a brief discussion of Stein’s treatment of empathy and the experience of value, I turn to certain features of Roman Ingarden’s analyses of aesthetic experience found in The Literary Work of Art and The Cognition of the Work of Art that deal with what he refers to as the reader’s ‘emotional coexperience’ of situations and events represented in the work of art. I conclude by comparing Stein’s account of empathy with Ingarden’s account of aesthetic experience, both of which deal at length with the subjective activities of “feeling with” and emotional coexperience.

Key words
empathy, aesthetic experience, aesthetic value, emotional coexperiencing, personal values, psychology, phenomenology, Edith Stein, Roman Ingarden.

References

• Coleridge, S.T.(1817). Biographia Literaria: Or, Biographical Sketches of My Literary Life and Opinions. New York: Leavitt, Lord & Company.
• Dickie, G.(1964). The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1, 56–66.
• Ingarden, R.(1973a). The Literary Work of Art (G.G.Grabowicz, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Ingarden, R.(1973b). The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art (R.A.Crowley, & K.R.Olson, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Ingarden, R.(1991). Zu Edith Steins Analyse der Einfühlung und der menschlichen Person. In W.Herbstrith (Ed.), Denken im Dialog. Zur Philosophie Edith Steins (72–82). Tübingen: Attempto Verlag.
• Koss, J.(2006). On the Limits of Empathy. Art Bulletin, 88, 139–157.
• Lipps, T.(1903). Leitfaden der Psychologie. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/leitfadenderpsy00lippgoog/page/n1
• Lipps, T.(1905). Die ethischen Grundfragen. Hamburg: Leopold Voss Verlag.
• Lipps, T.(1907). Ästhetik. In P.Hinneberg (Ed.), Systematische Philosophie (351–390). Berlin: Verlag von B.G.Teubner.
• Mitscherling, J.(1988). The Aesthetic Experience and the “Truth” of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 28, 28–39.
• Rader, M.(Ed.). (1952). A Modern Book of Esthetics. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
• Stein, E.(1917). Zum Problem der Einfühlung. Halle: Buchdruckerei des Waisenhauses.
• Stein, E.(1964). On the Problem of Empathy (W. Stein, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Stein, E.(1986). Life in a Jewish Family (Dr. L.Gelber, & R.Leuven, Eds.; J.Koeppel, Trans.). Washington: ICS Publications.
• Stein, E.(1993). Self-Portrait in Letters: 1916-1942 (Dr. L.Gelber, & R.Leuven, Eds; J.Koeppel, Trans.). Washington: ICS Publications.
• Stein, E.(2000). Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities (M. Sawicki, Ed.; M.C.Baseheart, & M. Sawicki, Trans.). Washington: ICS Publications.
• Volkelt, J.(1905-14). System der Ästhetik (2nd ed.). Munich: Beck.
• Worringer, W. (1997). Abstraction and Empathy: A Contribution to the Psychology of Style (M.Bullock, Trans.). Chicago: Ivan R.Dee.
• Zahavi, D.(2014). Self & Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. New York: Oxford University Press.