Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 2323


MARC RICHIR
DEFENESTRATION

Title in the language of publication: МАРК РИШИР
ДЕФЕНЕСТРАЦИЯ
Translation from French: DENIS MIKHAYLOV
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 9, №2 (2020), 760-781
Language: Russian
Document type: Translation from French
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-2-760-781 PDF(Downloads: 2517)

Abstract
The article « La Défenestration » by Belgian philosopher Marc Richir has been translated into Russian for the first time for this issue of the “Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology.” In his early work “The Defenestration” Richir raises the question of relation between the subject and conceivable world. Here, a philosopher is pictured contemplating the world through the window of his tower. In such detachment from the world the thinker finds himself according to all Modern philosophies of consciousness. Husserl’s phenomenology inherits this detachment, since Husserl imposes the structure of transcendental ego as external to the world. Richir abolishes the concept of transcendental ego with the help of heideggerian Dasein, but analyzing Heidegger’s ontology he comes to the conclusion that the latter remains fixated on beings. Believing a person to live in the fundamental openness of Being, Heidegger places such a person in the secondary world of “truth.” In order to overcome the remains of traditional philosophy in Heidegger’s ontology Richir turns to Merleau-Ponty’ “cosmology of the visible.” The author takes the Merleau-Ponty’s thesis that everything visible has something fundamentally invisible in it.This allows him to discover the universe of “nothing” (rien), which includes both the visible and whatis “behind” it. As a result Richir overcomes the classical dualism of the sensual and the intelligible. The concept of defenestration places the subject and the world in the same universe.

Key words
Marc Richir, Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, detranscendentalisation, subjectivity, phenomenalisation, distortion, truth.

References

  • Descartes, R.(1950). Selected Works. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M.(1954). Vom Wesen der Wahrheit. Frankfurt: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M.(1959). Unterwegs zur Sprache. Pfullingen: Neske.
  • Heidegger, M.(1964). Lettre sur l’humanisme. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.
  • Heidegger, M.(1966). Einführung in die Metaphysik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Heidegger, M.(1967). Wegmarken. Frankfurt: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M.(1991). On the Essence of Truth. In Conversation on a Country Road (8–28). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M.(1993a). A Dialogue on Language. In Time and Being (273–302). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublica Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M.(1993b). Letter on Humanism. In Time and Being (192–221). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Respublica Publ. (In Russian)
  • Heidegger, M.(1998). Introduction to Metaphysics. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Vysshaia religiozno-filosofskaia shkola Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E.(1962a). L’origine de la Géométrie. Paris: PUF.
  • Husserl, E.(1962b). Phänomenologische Psychologie: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925 (Hua IX). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E.(1964). Erfahrung und Urteil. Hamburg: Claasen.
  • Husserl, E.(1965). Logique formelle et logique transcendantale. Paris: PUF.
  • Husserl, E.(1974). Formale und Transzendentale Logik: Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft (Hua XVII). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E.(1985). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie. Halle: Gallimard.
  • Husserl, E.(1996). Origin of Geometry. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E.(2017). Experience and Judgment (A.Frolov, Trans). Rus. Ed. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6 (1), 192–200. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2017-6-1-192-200
  • Husserl, E.(2019). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenemenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)
  • Loreau, M.(1971). Jean Dubuffet. Délits déportements lieux de haut jeu. Paris: Weber.
  • Loreau, M.(1973). Légère et pleine de faux-fuyants. In Cahier de l’Herne: Jean Dubuffet. Paris: l’Herne.
  • Merleau-Ponty, М.(1964a). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M.(1964b). L’œil et l’esprit. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M.(2006). The Visible and the Invisible. Rus. Ed. Minsk: Logvinov Publ. (In Russian)
  • Richir, M.(1970). Le Rien enroulé. Esquisse d’une pensée de la phénoménalisation. Textures, 7 (8), 3–24.