Article/Publication Details
Views: 2153

REVISITING INGARDEN’S THEORETICAL BIOLOGICAL ACCOUNT OF THE LITERARY WORK OF ART: IS THE COMPUTER GAME AN “ORGANISM”?

Abstract
From his earliest published writings to his last, Roman Ingarden displayed an interest in theoretical biology and its efforts to clarify what distinguishes living organisms from other types of entities. However, many of his explorations of such issues are easily overlooked, because they don’t appear in works that are primarily ontological, metaphysical, or anthropological in nature but are “hidden” within his works on literary aesthetics, where Ingarden sought to define the nature of living organisms in order to compare literary works to such entities. This article undertakes a historical textual analysis that traces the evolution of Ingarden’s thought regarding the nature of the literary work of art as an organism-like entity and uncovers its links with the simultaneous development of his systems theory and its central concept of the “relatively isolated system”: for Ingarden, a literary work and an organism are each a systematically transforming, “living,” functional-structural whole that comprises a system of hierarchically arranged and partially isolated (yet interdependent) elements whose harmonious interaction allows the literary work or organism to fulfill its chief function. Having completed that historical analysis, we test Ingarden’s assessment of works of art as organism-like entities in a novel context by investigating the organism-like qualities of the contemporary computer game; insofar as their AI-driven behavior displays a form of agency, such games might appear to be even more “alive” than traditional works of art. We show that Ingarden’s conceptual framework provides a useful tool for understanding the “organicity” of such games as works of art, despite the fact that they differ qualitatively from those art forms with which Ingarden was directly familiar.

Key words
: Roman Ingarden, theoretical biology, organisms, systems theory, relatively isolated systems, philosophical aesthetics, literary works, computer games, Zygmunt Łempicki, Max Scheler.

References

• Bertalanffy, L.(1932). Theoretische Biologie: Erster Band: Allgemeine Theorie, Physikochemie, Aufbau und Entwicklung des Organismus. Berlin: Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger.
• Brown, J.A., & Marston, H.R.(2018). Gen X and Digital Games: Looking Back to Look Forward. In J.Zhou, & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population: Applications in Health, Assistance, and Entertainment (485–500). Cham: Springer.
• Deplazes-Zemp, A.(2012). The Conception of Life in Synthetic Biology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 757–774.
• Forterre, P.(2016). To Be or Not to Be Alive: How Recent Discoveries Challenge the Traditional Definitions of Viruses and Life. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 59, 100–108.
• Gierulanka, D.(1981). Przedmowa tłumacza (D.Gierulanka, Trans.). In R.Ingarden, Spór o istnienie świata, Tom III: O strukturze przyczynowej realnego świata (5–12). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Ingarden, R.(1919). Dążenia fenomenologów. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 22 (3), 118–156; 22 (4), 315–351.
• Ingarden, R.(1922a). Intuition und Intellekt bei Henri Bergson: Darstellung und Versuch einer Kritik. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 5, 285–461.
• Ingarden, R.(1922b). W sprawie istoty doświadczenia wewnętrznego. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 25 (4), 512–534.
• Ingarden, R.(1925). Essentiale Fragen: Ein Beitrag zum Wessensproblem. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 7, 125–304.
• Ingarden, R.(1928). Max Scheler. Wspomnienie pośmiertne. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 31 (4), 343–351.
• Ingarden, R.(1931). Das literarische Kunstwerk. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
• Ingarden, R.(1933). Formy obcowania z dziełem literackiem. Wiadomości Literackie, 10 (7/478), 3.
• Ingarden, R.(1935). Vom formalen Aufbau des individuellen Gegenstandes. Studia Philosophica, 1, 29–106.
• Ingarden, R.(1936). Formy poznawania dzieła literackiego. Pamiętnik Literacki, 33, 163–192.
• Ingarden, R.(1937a). O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego. Lwów: Wydawnictwo Zakładu Narodowego Imienia Ossolińskich.
• Ingarden, R.(1937b). Sprawa formy i treści w dziele literackim. Życie Literackie, 5, 153–167.
• Ingarden, R.(1939). O poznawaniu cudzych stanów psychicznych. Lecture at the meeting of the Lwowskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Jan Kazimierz University, Lwów, June 6. Personal archive of Roman Ingarden, KIII–26, jednostek 84. Archiwum Nauki PAN i PAU, Kraków, Poland. Retrieved from http://ingarden.archive.uj.edu.pl/archiwum/odczyt-romana-ingardena-na-posiedzeniulwowskiego-towarzystwa-naukowego-z-15-06-1939
• Ingarden, R.(1943). Manuscript notes on the “Theoretische Biologie” (1928) of Jakob von Uexküll. Personal archive of Roman Ingarden, KIII–26, jednostek 89/3. Archiwum Nauki PAN i PAU, Kraków, Poland.
• Ingarden, R.(1947). Spór o istnienie świata, Vol.I.Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.
• Ingarden, R.(1948a). Quelques remarques sur la relation de causalité. In Atti del Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia promosso dall’Istituto di studi filosofici (Roma, 15-20 novembre, 1946), vol. II: L’Esistenzialismo (573–577). Milano: Castellani.
• Ingarden, R.(1948b). Spór o istnienie świata, Vol.II.Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.
• Ingarden, R.(1957). O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego. In Studia z estetyki, Vol. 1 (1–251). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Ingarden, R.(1960). Spór o istnienie świata, Vol.I.Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Ingarden, R.(1970a). O pojęciu istoty. Lecture at a scientific meeting of the Polish Philosophical Society, April 4. Personal archive of Roman Ingarden, KIII–26, jednostek 77. Archiwum Nauki PAN i PAU, Kraków, Poland. Retrieved from http://ingarden.archive.uj.edu.pl/archiwum/odczyt-romana-ingardena-o-pojeciu-istoty-z-04-04-1970
• Ingarden, R.(1970b). Poznanie a priori u Kanta i Husserla. Lecture at a scientific meeting of the Polish Philosophical Society, March 21. Personal archive of Roman Ingarden, KIII–26, jednostek 77. Archiwum Nauki PAN i PAU, Kraków, Poland. Retrieved from http://ingarden.archive.uj.edu. pl/archiwum/odczyt-romana-ingardena-poznanie-a-priori-u-kanta-i-husserla-z-21-03-1970r
• Ingarden, R.(1970c). Über die Verantwortung: Ihre ontischen Fundamente. Stuttgart: Reclam.
• Ingarden, R.(1974). Über die kausale Struktur der realen Welt: Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt III. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
• Ingarden, R.(1983). Man and Value (A. Szylewicz, Trans.). München: Philosophia Verlag; Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
• Ingarden, R.(1988). O dziele literackim: Badania z pogranicza ontologii, teorii języka i filozofii literatury (M.Turowicz, Trans.). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Ingarden, R.(1997). Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks. Gesammelte Werke: Band 13 (E.M. Swiderski, Ed.). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
• Ingarden, R.(2013). Controversy over the Existence of the World. Vol.I.Frankfurt: Peter Lang Edition.
• Łempicki, Z.(1932). Dzieło literackie: Moc i działanie. Wiadomości Literackie, 9 (10/427), 3.
• Makai, P.K.(2018). Video Games as Objects and Vehicles of Nostalgia. Humanities, 7 (4), 123.
• Maluga, L.(2006). Autonomiczne rysunki architektoniczne. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
• Marak, K., Markocki, M., & Brzostek, D.(2019). Gameplay, Emotions and Narrative: Independent Games Experienced. Pittsburgh: ETC Press.
• Olson, E.T.(1997). The Ontological Basis of Strong Artificial Life. Artificial Life, 3 (1), 29–39.
• Półtawski, A.(1978). The Idea and the Place of Human Creativity in the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden. Dialectics and Humanism, 5 (2), 129–140.
• Rothschuh, K.E.(1959). Theorie des Organismus: Bios, Psyche, Pathos. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
• Scheler, M.(1923). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie: Der „Phänomenologie der Sympathiegefühle“. Bonn: Verlag von Friedrich Cohen.
• Scheler, M.(1928). Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. Darmstadt: Otto Reichl.
• Sienkiewicz, P., & Wojtala, R.(1991). Systems Thinking in Poland. In M.Jackson, G.Mansell, R.Flood, R.Blackham, & S.Probert (Eds.), Systems Thinking in Europe (197–199). New York: Plenum Press.
• Swalwell, M.(2007). The Remembering and the Forgetting of Early Digital Games: From Novelty to Detritus and Back Again. Journal of Visual Culture, 6 (2), 255–273.
• Uexküll, J.(1928). Theoretische Biologie. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.