Article/Publication Details
Views: 2152

TIME AND ITS INDETERMINACY IN ROMAN INGARDEN’S CONCEPT OF THE LITERARY WORK OF ART

Abstract
The time of the literary work of art is a schematized aspect of the represented objectivities of the literary work. Roman Ingarden’s analysis of the time of the literary work extends upon Husserl’s phenomenology of time consciousness but nevertheless remains consistent with it, insofar as within a literary work as well as actuality, an objective time or literary objective time is constituted from an experience of temporal objects (or in the case of the work of art, represented objectivities). The time of the literary work of art is experienced through its represented objectivities and depends on an already existent concept of objective time. (We conceive of the time of the literary work of art as a variant of actual time.) The time of the literary work, however, gains an indeterminacy, as the author of the literary work is able to manipulate our experience of time within the literary work by predicting how the reader will concretize its events, characters, and objects with respect to time. I use Alain Robbe-Grillet’s representation of the centipede in La Jalousie as an example of the possible manipulations of time, explicable through Ingarden’s analysis of time in the literary work of art.

Key words
Ingarden, literature, indeterminacy, time consciousness, schematized aspects, concretization.

References

• Aristotle. (1984). De Interpretatione (J.L.Ackrill, Trans.). In The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton UP.
• Butterfield, J.(1984). Seeing the Present. Mind: New Series, 93 (370), 161–176.
• Eilstein, H.(2002). Against Detensers. In H.Eilstein (Ed.), A Collection of Polish Works on Philosophical Problems of Time and Spacetime (93–125). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E.(1964). The Phenomenology of Internal Time Consciousness (J. S.Churchill, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana UP.
• Ingarden, R.(1973a). The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature (G.G.Grabowicz, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Ingarden, R.(1973b). The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art (R.A.Crowley & K.R.Olson, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Kietz, C.(2015). Temporal Conflict in the Reading Experience. In P.F.Bundgaard, & F.Stjernfelt (Eds.), Investigations Into the Phenomenology of the Ontology of the Work of Art: What are Artworks and How Do We Experience Them? (51–73). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14090-2_4
• McTaggart, J.M.E.(1908). The Unreality of Time. Mind: New Series, 17 (68), 457–474.
• Mitscherling, J.(1997). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
• Mitscherling, J.(2010). Aesthetic Genesis: The Origin of Consciousness in the Intentional Being of Nature. Lanham: University Press of America.
• Półtawski, A.(2002). The Problem of Time in the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden. In H.Eilstein (Ed.), A Collection of Polish Works on Philosophical Problems of Time and Spacetime (137–148). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Robbe-Grillet, A.(1957). La Jalousie. Paris: Minuit.
• Stein, E.(1989). On the Problem of Empathy (W. Stein, Trans.). Washington, D.C.: ICS Publications.
• Szczepańska, A.(1989). The Structure of Artworks. In B.Dziemidok, & P.McCormick (Eds.), On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden. Interpretations and Assessments (21–54). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.