- 29 June 2020
Article/Publication Details
Views: 2288
REPLY TO ADONIS FRANGESKOU’S RESPONSE
Title in the language of publication: | REPLY TO ADONIS FRANGESKOU’S RESPONSE |
Author: | ANNA YAMPOLSKAYA |
Issue: |
HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology. Vol. 9, №1 (2020), 366-372 |
Language: | English |
Document type: | Discussion |
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372 | PDF (Downloads: 3102) |
Abstract
This is my short reply to Adonis Frangeskou’s response to my review of his book (2017). I offer a careful reading of the passage from Levinas quoted in Frangeskou’s response. I discuss the idea of God-in-me in connection with the issues of sensibility, vulnerability, and suffering. I argue that interpreting Levinas within the framework of the analytics of the sublime is crucially important for the catastrophic dimension of Levinas’ approach to subjectivity.
Key words
Levinas, Kant, God, sensibility, sublime, subjectivity.
References
- Cohen, R. (1994). Elevation: The Height of the Good in Rosenzweig and Levinas. London: University of Chicago Press.
- Frangeskou, A. (2017). Levinas, Kant and the Problematic of Temporality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lévinas, E. (1978). Autrement qu’être ou au-delá de l’essence. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.
- Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than Being, or, Beyond Essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). The Hague: Nijhoff.
- Lévinas, E. (1982). De Dieu qui vient á l’idée. Paris: Vrin.
- Lévinas, E. (1993). Dieu, la mort et le temps. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.
- Levinas, E. (1998). Of God Who Comes to Mind (B.Bergo, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Levinas, E. (2000). God, Death, and Time (B. Bergo, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Lyotard, J.-F. (1991). Leçons sur l’Analytique du sublime: Kant, « Critique de la faculté de juger ». Paris: Galilée.
- Murakami, Y. (2002). Lévinas phénoménologue. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.
- Richir, M. (1998). Phenomenon and Infinity. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 20(2)-21(1), 153–184.
- Vaihinger, H. (1911). Die Philosophie des Als Ob. System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus. Mit einem Anhang über Kant und Nietzsche. Reuther & Reichard: Berlin.
- Yampolskaya, A. (2018). Review of the Book “Levinas, Kant and the Problematic of Temporality” (A.Frangeskou). Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 7(2), 576–585. doi: 10.21638/2226–5260–2018–7–2–576–585. (In Russian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Social networks: