Article/Publication Details
Views: 2522

THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH TO QUANTUM MECHANICS: A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHY OF QUANTUM MECHANICS BY REVISITING BOHR AND HUSSERL

Abstract
Niels Bohr, considered one of the fathers of quantum mechanics, formulated a complex interpretation of quantum mechanics that guided his understanding of quantum experiments. The contemporary dispute between realism and anti-realism, the two main approaches to the interpretation of quantum mechanics, is often based on different attitudes towards or even readings of Bohr. We propose that a better understanding of Bohr’s philosophical thought can contribute to the contemporary reconciliation of these opposing philosophical views and thus to a better understanding of the quantum world. Unfortunately, in many contemporary interpretations, Bohr’s philosophical approach to quantum mechanics has been misunderstood, re-interpreted or labelled as ambiguous. This is mostly due to the dispersion of Bohr’s complex and unique interpretation through different texts, never united in a single systematically conceptualized work. To comprehensively explain Bohr’s philosophical approach and his main philosophical concepts, we consider the many similarities between Bohr’s and Husserl’s philosophical approach to science. Husserl developed his philosophical standpoint in a cultural context similar to Bohr’s and shared Bohr’s objects of philosophical consideration as well as his approach to these objects. Parallel reading of Bohr’s and Husserl’s texts reveals the closeness between Bohr’s ontological realism—epistemological anti-realism standpoint and Husserl’s phenomenological standpoint. This explains their similar views on the relationship between mathematical language, scientific method and Nature. While Bohr’s use of the term phenomenon is not equal to Husserl’s, Husserl’s rigorous philosophical explanation of the term helps us to better understand Bohr’s use. Furthermore, the parallel reading facilitates better understanding of one of Bohr’s main philosophical theses, often labelled as ambiguous and interpreted in different ways, that it is necessary to use classical concepts to describe quantum phenomena. We claim that the thesis is connected with the advance of epistemological reconsideration of science at the time of Bohr’s writing. Thus, Bohr considers some parts of argumentation as self-evident, while they are not evident to the contemporary reader. Husserl’s analysis of the relationship between science and the life-world offers a much-needed background for a comprehensive understanding of Bohr’s thesis. The insight into the similarities between Bohr’s and Husserl’s philosophical approach to science and scientific phenomena enables a philosophically rigorous reading of Bohr’s texts; it can eliminate some of the disagreements between realists and anti-realists and provide a firmer philosophical ground for a dialog between them.

Key words
Edmund Husserl, Niels Bohr, phenomenology, phenomena, classical concepts, quantum mechanics, life-world.

References

• Bohr, N. (1929). The Quantum of Action and the Description of Nature. In The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. I (1987) (92–101). Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
• Bohr, N. (1935). Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Reality be Considered Complete? In The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. IV (1998) (73–82). Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
• Bohr, N. (1938). Natural Philosophy and Human Cultures. In The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. II (1987) (23–31). Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
• Bohr, N. (1946). Newton’s Principles and Modern Atomic Mechanics. In The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. IV (1998) (126–131). Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
• Bohr, N.(1954). Unity of Knowledge. In The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. II (1987) (67–82). Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
• Bohr, N. (1958). The Rutherford Memorial Lecture. In The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. III (1987) (30–73). Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
• Brukner, C., & Zeilinger, A. (2003). Information and Fundamental Elements of the Structure of Quantum Theory. In L. Castell, & O. Ischebeck (Eds.), Time, Quantum, Information (323–354). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
• Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47, 777.
• Faye, J., & Folse, H. J. (1998). Introduction. In The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. IV (12–13) (1–20). Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.
• Fleck, L. (1935). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkolektiv. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co.
• Føllesdal, D. (2010). The Lebenswelt in Husserl. In D. Hyder, & H. J. Rheinberger (Eds.), Science and the Life-World (27–45). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Fuchs, C. A., & Peres, A. (2000, March 1). Quantum Theory Needs No ‘Interpretation’. Physics Today, 70–71.
• Heisenberg, W. (1967). Quantum theory and it interpretation. In S. Rozental (Ed.), Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by his Friends and Colleagues. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
• Hribar, T. (1997). Phenomenon of the Mind. In Ideje za čisto fenomenologijo in fenomenološko filozofijo. Ljubljana: Slovenska Matica Publ. (In Slovenian).
• Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil. 1905–1920 (Hua XIII). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology—An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Husserl, E. (1998). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. First book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Lurçat, F. (2007). Understanding Quantum Mechanics with Bohr and Husserl. In L. Boi, P. Kerszberg, & F. Patras, (Eds.), Rediscovering Phenomenology (229–258). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Merali, Z. (2015). Quantum Physics: What is Really Real. Nature, 521, 7552.
• Mermin, D. (2004). What’s Wrong With This Quantum World. Physics Today, 57 (2), 10. doi: 10.1063/1.1688051
• Moran, D., & Cohen, J. (2012). The Husserl Dictionary. London: Continium International.
• Petersen, A. (1963). Philosophy of Niels Bohr. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 19(7), 8–14.
• Timpson, C. G. (2010). Information, Immaterialism, Instrumentalism: Old and New in Quantum Information. In A. Bokulich, & G. Jaeger (Eds.), Philosophy of Quantum Information and Entanglement (208–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Zeilinger, A. (1999). A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 29, 631–643.