Article/Publication Details
Views: 3844

SOUND ONTOLOGY AND THE BRENTANO-HUSSERL ANALYSIS OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF TIME

Abstract
Both Franz Brentano and Edmund Husserl addressed sound while trying to explain the inner consciousness of time and gave to it the status of a supporting example. Although their inquiries were not aimed at clarifying in detail the nature of the auditory experience or sounds themselves, they made some interesting observations that can contribute to the current philosophical discussion on sounds. On the other hand, in analytic philosophy, while inquiring the nature of sounds, their location, auditory experience or the audible qualities and so on, the representatives of that trend of thought have remained silent about the depiction of sound and the auditory phenomena in the phenomenological tradition. The paper’s intention is to relate both endeavours, yet the perspective carried out is that of analytic philosophy and, thus, I pay special attention to conceptual analysis as a methodological framework. In this sense, I first explain what sound ontology is in the context of analytic philosophy and the views that it encompasses—namely, the Property View (PV), the Wave View (WV) and the Event View (EV)—. Secondly, I address the problems it entails, emphasising that of sound individuation. In a third section, I propose the possibly controversial conjunction of a “Brentano-Husserl Analysis of the Consciousness of Time” (for short “Brentano-Husserl analysis”) and outline the commonalities of both authors, without ignoring its discrepancies. My main focus is Husserl’s 1905 Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des Inneren Zeitbewusstseins. While addressing the Brentano-Husserl analysis, I elaborate on the problem of temporal and spatial extension (Raumlichkeit and Zeitlichkeit, respectively) of both consciousness and sound. Such comparison is a key one, since after these two developments, one can notice some theoretical movements concerning the shift of attention from sounds to the unity of consciousness, and how they mirror each other. After examining the controversial claims concerning the temporal and spatial extension of both consciousness and sound, I argue in the concluding paragraphs that while considering the accounts of sound ontology, the Brentano-Husserl analysis would probably endorse a Property View and that this could have interesting consequences for the issue of Sound Individuation.

Key words
Sound, auditory experience, Franz Brentano, Edmund Husserl, sound ontology, sound individuation, consciousness of time (Zeitbewusstseins), temporal extension (Zeitlichkeit), spatial extension (Raumlichkeit).

References

• Abella, M. (2009). Franz Brentano: Unidad de Conciencia y Conciencia del tiempo. Michoacan: Jitanjáfora.
• Bernet, R. (2009). Husserl’s Early Time-Analysis in Historical Context. Journal of British Society for Phenomenology, 40(2), 117–154.
• Bernet, R., Kern, I., & Marbach, E. (1996). Edmund Husserl. Darstellung seines Denkens. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
• Brentano, F. (1995). Descriptive Psychology. London: Routledge.
• Brentano, F. (2009). Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum. London: Croom Helm.
• Casati, R., & Dokic, J. (1994). La philosophie du son. Nimes: Chambon.
• Casati, R., & Dokic, J. (2014). Sounds. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (E. N. Zalta, Ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford/archives/fall2014/entries/sounds/
• Cleland, C. (1991). On the Individuation of Events. Synthese, 86(2), 229–254.
• Dainton, B. (2017). Temporal Consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (E. N. Zalta, Ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford/archives/fall2017/entries/consciousness-temporal/
• Davis, W. (2005). Concepts and Epistemic Individuation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(2), 290–325.
• Held, K. (2003). Husserl’s Phenomenology of the Life-World. In D. Welton (Ed.), The New Husserl: A Critical Reader (32–62). Indiana: Indiana University Press.
• Husserl, E. (1928). Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
• Husserl, E. (1966). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1907) (Hua X). The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.
• Husserl, E. (1973). Ding und Raum. Vorlesungen 1907 (Hua XVI). The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.
• Husserl, E. (1983). Studien zur Arithmetik und Geometrie. Texte aus dem Nachlass (Hua XXI). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
• Husserl, E. (2001). Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewusstsein (Hua XXXIII). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Husserl, E. (2004). Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit (Hua XXXVIII). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Ihde, D. (2007). Listening and Voice, Phenomenologies of Sound. New York: State University of New York Press.
• Illescas Nájera, M. D. (2012). La vida en la forma del tiempo. Un estudio sobre fenomenología del tiempo en la obra de Edmund Husserl. Michoacán: Jitanjáfora.
• Kant, I. (1956). Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Mainer.
• Kelly, M. (2016). Phenomenology and the Problem of Time. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Kortooms, T. (2002). Phenomenology of Time. Analysis of Time-Consciousness. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Springer.
• Kraus, O. (1976). Toward a Phenomenology of Time Consciousness. In L. McAlister (Ed.), The Philosophy of Franz Brentano (224–239). London: Duckworth.
• LeClerc, I. (1979). Concepts of Space. In P. Backscheider (Ed.), Probability, Time, and Space in Eighteenth-Century Literature (209–215). New York: AMS.
• Lohmar, D. (2010). On the Constitution of the Time of the World: the Emergence of Objective Time on the Ground of Subjective Time. In D. Lohmar, & I. Yamaguchi (Eds.), On Time- New Contributions to the Husserlian Phenomenology of Time (115–136). Cham: Springer.
• Maclachlan, D. L. C. (1989). The Philosophy of Perception. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• Méndez-Martínez, J. L. (2019). What ‘Counts’ as a Sound and How ‘to Count a’ Sound? The Problems of Individuating and Identifying Sounds. Synthesis Philosophica, 67 (1/2019), 173–190.
• O’Callaghan, C. (2007). Sounds: A Philosophical Theory. London: Oxford University Press.
• O’Callaghan, C. (2009). Sounds as Events. In M. Nudds, & C. O’Callaghan (Eds.), Sounds and Perception. New Philosophical Essays (26–49). New York: Oxford University Press.
• O’Callaghan, C. (2014). Auditory Perception. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (E. N. Zalta, Ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-auditory/
• Olbromski, C. J. (2011). The Notion of ‚lebendige Gegenwart‘ as Compliance with the Temporality of the “Now”: The Late Husserl’s Phenomenology of Time. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
• Pasnau, R. (1999). What is Sound. The Philosophical Quarterly, 49 (196), 309–324.
• Rollinger, R. P. (1999). Husserl’s Position in the School of Brentano. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Springer.
• Sartre, J.-P. (1966). La Transcendance de L’ego, esquisse d’une description phénoménologique. Paris: Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin.
• Scrutton, R. (2009). Sounds as Secondary Objects and Pure Events. In M. Nudds, & C. O’Callaghan (Eds.), Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays (50–68). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Shim, M. K. (2017). Husserl’s Spatialization of Perceptual Consciousness. In R. Walton, S. Taguchi, & R. Rubio (Eds.), Perception, Affectivity and Volition in Husserl’s Phenomenology (37–56). Cham: Springer.
• Simons, P. (1995). Introduction to the 2nd Edition. In F. Brentano, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (xiii-xx). London: Routledge.
• Simons, P. (2015). How to Do Things with Things. In B. Leclercq, S. Richard, & D. Seron (Eds.), Objects and Pseudo-Objects, Ontological Deserts and Jungles from Brentano to Carnap (3–15). Berlin: DeGruyter.
• Smith, B. (1994). Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano. Chicago: Open Court.
• Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Routledge.
• Stumpf, C. (1976). Reminiscences of Brentano. In L. McAlister (Ed.), The Philosophy of Franz Brentano (10–46). London: Duckworth.
• Summa, M. (2014). Spatio-Temporal Intertwining: Husserl’s Transcendental Aesthetic. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Tarditi, C. (2018). Rethinking Spatiotemporal Extension: Husserl’s Contribution to the Debate on the Continuum Hypothesis. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 7(1), 137–159.
• Unger, P. (2006). The Problem of the Many. In P. Unger (Ed.), Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2 (113–182). London: Oxford University Press.