Article/Publication Details
Views: 1673

HUSSERL’S CONTEXTUALIST THEORY OF TRUTH

Abstract
This article draws attention to certain features of Edmund Husserl’s theory of evidence and truth which, on closer look, reveal how his thoughts on the nature of experience and cognition are current and relevant even in the early 21st century. Many of his contemporaries and subsequent authors considered Husserl to be a late representative of traditional, modernist metaphysics—an idealist, a foundationalist, and an intellectualist, etc. The publication of his vast unpublished manuscripts has evidently dispelled such charges, and a thorough and attentive perusal of his published works (or works prepared for publication) clearly shows how highly problematic such charges were. In the article I aim to highlight the contextualist character of Husserl’s understanding of evidence and truth, of knowledge and Being. Every insight and every entity in his thought fits into a wider context of further experiences, insights, and entities. This conception is manifest at every level of his experience and knowledge: (1) everyday experiences, (2) scientific and (3) philosophical cognition. The evidence at every level is fundamentally open and contextual, and their correlation constitutes an essentially organic reality. With such formulations Husserl says something quite similar to what is now found under the label ‘epistemic contextualism’ in contemporary analytic philosophy. Next to the contextual character of evidence, the second main thesis of my essay is that Husserl’s stance in this question might serve as a fruitful field of dialogue between phenomenology and analytic philosophy.

Key words
Edmund Husserl, non-foundationalism, contextualism, evidence, apodicticity, truth, phenomenological metaphysics.

References

• Annis, D. (1978). A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(3), 213–219.
• Black, T. (2003). Contextualism in Epistemology. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/contextu/
• Cavallaro, M. (2019). Der Heroismus der Vernunft. Ein Beitrag zur späten Ethik Husserls. In F. Fraisopi (Ed.), Mathesis, Grund, Vernunft: Die philosophische und geistige Identität Europas zwischen Deutschem Idealismus und Phänomenologie.Studien zur Phänomenologie und praktischen Philosophie (147–168). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
• Cavallaro, M., & Heffernan, G. (Eds.). (2020). The Existential Husserl. A Collection of Critical Essays. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Cohen, S. (1988). How to Be a Fallibilist. In J. E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 91–123. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Co.
• DeRose, K. (2009). The Case for Contextualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Drummond, J. (1990). Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Fink, E. (1988). Cartesianische Meditation. Teil I: Die Idee einer transzendentalen Methodelehre. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The Phenomenological Mind. New York, London: Routledge.
• Geniusas, S. (2012). The Origins of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Gondek, H. D., & Tengelyi, L. (2011). Neue Phänomenologie in Frankreich. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
• Heffernan, G. (1999). A Study in the Sedimented Origins of Evidence: Husserl and His Contemporaries Engaged in a Collective Essay in the Phenomenology and Psychology of Epistemic Justification. Husserl Studies, 16, 83–181.
• Heffernan, G. (2009). On Husserl’s Remark that „[s]elbst eine sich als apodiktisch ausgebende Evidenz kann sich als Täuschung enthüllen…“ (XVII 164:32–33): Does the Phenomenological Method Yield Any Epistemic Infallibility? Husserl Studies, 25, 15–43.
• Hermberg, K. (2006). Husserl’s Phenomenology: Knowledge, Objectivity and Others. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
• Hopp, W. (2009). Phenomenology and Falliblity. Husserl Studies, 25, 1–14.
• Huertas-Jourda, J. (1983). On the Two Foundations of Knowledge According to Husserl. In L.Embree (Ed.), Essays in Memory of Aron Gurwitsch (Current Continental Research, 007) (195–211). Washington: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.
• Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1956). Erste Philosophie (1923/4). Erste Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1959). Erste Philosophie (1923/4). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1970a). Philosophie der Arithmetik. Mit ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1970b). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Husserl, E. (1973a). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil. 1905–1920. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1973b). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil. 1929–35. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1973c). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1974). Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1976a). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführungin die reine Phänomenologie 1. Halbband: Text der 1.-3. Auflage — Nachdruck. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1976b). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. In zwei Bänden. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1988). Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre. 1908–1914. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1992). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ergänzungsband. Texte aus dem Nachlass 1934–1937. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1994a). Briefwechsel. Band II: Die Münchener Phänomenologen. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1994b). Briefwechsel. Band VI: Philosophenbriefe. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1994c). Briefwechsel. Band IX: Familienbriefe. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (1997). Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927–1931). The Encylopaedia Britannica Article, the Amsterdam Lectures, “Phenomenology and Anthropology”, and Husserl’s Marginal Notes in Being and Time and Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (2001a). Die ‚Bernauer Manuskripte‘ über das Zeitbewußtsein (1917/18). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (2001b). Logical Investigations I-II. London & New York: Routledge.
• Husserl, E. (2006). Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte. New York: Springer.
• Husserl, E. (2008). Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937). New York: Springer.
• Husserl, E. (2014). Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik (Texte aus dem Nachlass 1908 — 1937). New York: Springer.
• Lo, L. C. (2008). Die Gottesauffassung in Husserls Phänomenologie. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
• Lohmar, D. (2008). Kategoriale Anschauung (VI.Logische Untersuchung, §§ 40–66). In V. Mayer, & C. Erhard (Eds.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen (209–237). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
• Loidolt, S. (2011). Ist Husserls späte Ethik „existenzialistisch“? Überlegungen zu Texten der „Grenzprobleme“ (Hua 42). Journal Phänomenologie, 36, 34–44.
• Mezei, B. (1995). World and Life-World. Aspects of the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
• Moran, D. (2002). Introduction to Phenomenology. New York-London: Routledge.
• Reeder, H. P. (1990). Husserl’s Apodictic Evidence. Southwest Philosophical Studies, 12, 70–78.
• Ricoeur, P. (1987). Á l’école de la phénoménologie. Paris: Vrin.
• Rysiew, P. (2016). Epistemic Contextualism. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ contextualism-epistemology/
• Smith, D. W. (2007). Husserl. London & New York: Routledge.
• Sokolowski, R. (2008). Husserl’s Discovery of Philosophical Discourse. Husserl Studies, 24, 167–175.
• Thompson, D. L. (2014). Contextualism Revisited. Retrieved from http://plato.ucs.mun.ca/~davidt/ ContextualismRevisited.pdf
• Varga, P. A. (2011). The Architectonic and History of Phenomenology. Distinguishing between Fink’s and Husserl’s Notion of Phenomenological Philosophy. In D. Moran, & H. R. Sepp (Eds.), Phenomenology 2010 (4): Selected Essays from Northern Europe (87–114). Bucharest / Paris: Zeta Books / Argos.
• Williams, M. (1991). Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Williams, M. (1999). Fogelin’s Neo-Pyrrhonism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7, 141–158.