Article/Publication Details
Views: 2762

NEO-HUSSERLIAN MEDITATIONS: EXTENDING INTENTIONALITY TO THE OBJECTIVE REALM IN FIRST PHENOMENOLOGY

Abstract
I seek here to return to the original spirit of Edmund Husserl’s “radicalism.” To be radical means to be both rooted in a tradition and to retrace a path back to one’s roots. According to the position I advocate, phenomenology may be reconceived of as an enterprise in realism. Through a creative rereading of one of phenomenology’s founding texts, Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations, I suggest that phenomenology can indeed provide us with a semantics applicable to realist ontologies, provided we excise phenomenological concepts from their subjectivist framework, providing a new structure with which to analyze reality. Specifically, Husserl’s eidetic Apriori may be reconceived as denoting the inherent dynamism of existents. Movement would be the basis of manifestation, a universal category unconditioned in itself. That which appears need not be synonymous with all that which is given to experience. The eidos is the manifold of coiled movements awaiting manifestation, whilst the a priori is movement in itself. Following Graham Harman’s lead, I expand the scope of the Husserlian idea of intentionality, reconceptualizing it as the directionality pertaining to any process whatsoever. Following Jaakko Hintikka, I take the cogito to be nothing other than performativity in its emergent state. Several different phenomenal horizons can connect to the same type of intentionality. The nonlinear nature of temporality means that even radically distant horizons are capable of sharing in the same intentionality. Once reenvisioned as a “genuine universal ontology” (this is Husserl’s expression), phenomenological semantics can be extended to include any and all types of existents. First phenomenology need not maintain the primacy of perception or subjectivity.

Key words
Eidos, Graham Harman, Edmund Husserl, intentionality, phenomenology, realism, speculative realism.

References

• Auberlen, C. A. (1847). Die Theosophie Friedrich Christoph Oetingers nach ihren Grundzügen. Ein Beitrag zur Dogmengeschichte und zur Geschichte der Philosophie. Tübingen: L. Fr. Fues.
• Derrida, J. (2005). Writing and Difference. London/New York: Routledge.
• Di Bernardo, A., Millo, O., Barbone, M., Alpern, H., Kalcheim, Y., Sassi, U., … Robinson, J. W. A. (2017). P-wave Triggered Superconductivity in Single-Layer Graphene on an Electron-Doped Oxide Superconductor. Nature Communications, 1–9.
• Harman, G. (2011). The Quadruple Object. Winchester/Washington: Zero Books.
• Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla Metaphysics. Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. La Salle/Chicago: Open Court.
• Hintikka, J. (1962). Cogito, ergo sum: Inference or Performance? The Philosophical Review, 71(1), 3–32.
• Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Magliola, R. (1997) On Deconstructing Life-Worlds. Buddhism, Christianity, Culture. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
• Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. London, New York: Routledge.
• Schmidt, G. A., & Frank, A. (2018). The Silurian Hypothesis: Would It Be Possible to Detect an Industrial Civilization in the Geological Record? International Journal of Astrobiology, 18 (2), 1–9.
• Smith, A. D. (2003). Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations. London, New York: Routledge.
• Stump, A. D., Sperling, F. A. H., & Scriber, J. M. (2003). Gene Flow Between Great Lakes Region Populations of the Canadian Tiger Swallowtail Butterfly, ‘Papilio Canadensis,’ Near the Hybrid Zone with P. Glaucus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). The Great Lakes Entomologist, 36(1–2), 41–53.
• Tørring, T., Voigt, N. V., Nangreave, J., Yan, H., & Gothelf, K. V. (2011). DNA Origami: a Quantum Leap for Self-Assembly of Complex Structures. Chemical Society Reviews, 40(12), 5636–5646.