Article/Publication Details
Views: 3587

CRITIQUE OF IDEOLOGY IN GADAMER’S HERMENEUTICS AND HABERMAS’ CRITICAL THEORY

Abstract
The subject of this article is the debate of Gadamer and Habermas about the nature of critical thinking, the relationship between freedom and authority, the individual and traditions, documented in the book Hermeneutics and Criticism of Ideology (1971). Central to the author is the question: “What understanding of critical thinking would allow us to gain a higher degree of resistance to ideology?” The author consistently solves several problems. First, the author clarifies the meaning and significance of the key concepts of “ideology” and “criticism” in the critical theory of Frankfurt School and philosophical hermeneutics. Thanks to these explanations, becomes clear the basis for the possibility of a productive polemic between philosophical hermeneutics and critical theory. Secondly, in the analysis of the main lines of criticism by Habermas against the hermeneutical project of Gadamer, the author explicates the strengths and weaknesses in the argumentation of the opposing parties. The focus here is the problem of the relationship of critical reflection with prejudice, authority and tradition, the problem of theoretical maturity and methodological support of hermeneutics, the problem of forming a basic consensus of understanding and interaction. Based on a comparative analysis of the arguments and counterarguments of Gadamer and Habermas, the author shows the non-trivial nature of critical thinking and reveals new aspects in understanding the concept of criticism of ideology. The result of the comparative analysis is the idea of an integrative concept of ideology criticism, which allows productive use of the strengths of the critical and hermeneutic approaches, and thereby provide a higher resistance to ideology at the collective and individual levels.

Key words
Ideology, criticism, authority in cognition, tradition, Habermas critical theory, Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, integrative concept of ideology criticism.

References

• Adorno, T. (2011). The Jargon of Authenticity. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Kanon Publ. (In Russian).
• Apel, K.-O.(Ed.). (1971). Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
• Biskowski, L. J. (1998). Reason in Politics: Arendt and Gadamer on the Role of the Eide. Polity, 31 (2), 217–244. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Cesare, D. Di. (2016). Heidegger, die Juden, die Shoah. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
• Deines, S. (2012). Der Spielraum reflexiver Praxis: Gadamer und die praktische Theorie. In Hermeneutics and the Humanities. Dialogues with Hans Georg Gadamer (110–133). Amsterdam: Leiden University Press.
• Furs, V. N. (2006). Social Philosophy in Unpopular Presentation. Rus. Ed. Minsk: Ekonompress Publ. (In Russian).
• Gadamer, H.-G. (1988). Truth and Method. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian).
• Gronden, J. (2001). Hermeneutics of Facticity as Ontological Destruction and Criticism of Ideology. In E. Borisov, I. Inishev, & A. Lavruhin (Eds.), Issledovaniia po fenomenologii i filosofskoi germenevtike (45–55). Rus. Ed. Minsk: EGU Publ. (In Russian).
• Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1–2. Frankfurt am Main: Taschenbuch Verlag.
• Heidegger, M. (1988). Ontologie (Hermeneutik der Faktizität) (GA 63). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
• Heinz, M., & Kellerer, S. (Eds.). (2016). Martin Heideggers „Schwarze Hefte“. Eine philosophisch-politische Debatte. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
• Homolka, W., & Heidegger, A. (Eds.). (2016). Heidegger und der Antisemitismus. Positionen im Widerstreit. Mit Briefen von Martin und Fritz Heidegger. Freiburg i. B. : Herder Verlag.
• Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactiс Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
• Horkheimer, M. (1992). Traditionelle und kritische Theorie. Vier Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1969). Dialektik der Aufklärung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.
• Hörcher, F. (2020). A Political Philosophy of Conservatism: Prudence, Moderation and Tradition. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Latour, B. (2000). Die Hoffnung der Pandora. Untersuchungen zur Wirklichkeit der Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
• Luhman, N. (1995). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
• Makurova, A. (2016). Gadamer on Friendship and Solidarity: The Increase in Being in Communal Human Life. Russian Sociological Review, 15(4), 146–161. (In Russian).
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1955). Full Collected Works, Vol. 2 (3–230). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ. (In Russian).
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1965). Full Collected Works, Vol. 39 (82–86). Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ. (In Russian).
• Mikhajlovskiy, A. V. (2017). Some Remarks on the Characteristics of the Reception of Heidegger’s Thought in Russia Regarding the Debate on “Black Notebooks”. Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. Serija “Filosofija. Filologija”, 21(1), 54–71. (In Russian).
• Mironov, V. V., & Mironova, D. V. G. (2016). Philosopher and Power: Casus Heidegger. Voprosy filosofii, 7, 21–36. (In Russian).
• Motroshilova, N. V. (2015). M. Heidegger’s “Black Notebooks”: Following Up the Publication. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 121–162. (In Russian).
• Motroshilova, N. V. (2016). Once More on “Black Notebooks”. Voprosy filosofii, 7, 39–54. (In Russian).
• Mullins, W. A. (1969). The Concept of Ideology: an Analysis and Evaluation. Washington: University of Washington Press.
• Nancy, C.-L. (2017). Banalität Heideggers (TransPositionen). Frankfurt am Main: Taschenbuch Verlag.
• Orozco, T. (2004). Platonische Gewalt: Gadamers politische Hermeneutik der NS-Zeit. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.
• Schnedelbach, H. (1991). The Transformation of Critical Theory: Jürgen Habermas’ “The Theory of Communicative Action”. In A. Honneth, & H. Joas (Eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’ “The Theory of Communicative Action” (7–22). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Sölter, A. (2017). Mirrors of Evil. Cultural Criticism, Critique of Modernity, and Anti-Semitism in Heidegger’s Thought. In D. Pedersen (Ed.), Cosmopolitism, Heidegger, Wagener—Jewish Reflections (125–142). Stockholm: Judisk kultur i Sverige / Jewish Culture in Sweden.
• Sullivan, R. R. (1989). Political Hermeneutics. The Early Thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
• Trawny, P. (2018). Heidegger Fragmente. Eine philosophische Biographie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.
• Warnke, G. (2012). Solidarity and Tradition in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics. History and Theory. Studies in the Philosophy of History, 51(4), 6–22. Middletown: Wesleyan University.