Article/Publication Details
Views: 2980

GIVENNESS AS PROBLEM OF PHENOMENOLOGY

Abstract
According to principle of all principles, formulated in §24 of Ideas I, every originary presentive intuition is a legitimizing source of all cognition. The principle is the one of givenness, and, as such, it seems to show the limits of philosophical problematization, since the true givenness leaves no room for sensible questions and is, as Husserl puts it, the absolute matter of course. Proceeding from the key differences and intuitions of Husserlian phenomenology, I show instead that bringing phenomena to phenomenological givenness does not eliminate them, but, on the contrary, constitutes them as problematic. In grounding this thesis in the first section of the article I start with analyzing differences underlying the problematics of givenness in phenomenology. These are the correlative differences between empty and fulfilled intention and between meaning and fulfilling sense, which are introduced in Logical Investigations. In the second section I show that the Husserlian idea of final fulfillment as strict phenomenological evidence—eliminating the surplus of meaning in relation to the givenness and hence, at first sight, depriving the phenomenon of its problematical character—is, at the same time, the idea of final ‘emptying’ of meaning which turns it into the problem. In view of this, the article puts together the Husserlian description of final fulfillment with the analysis of the phenomenon of death in Heidegger’s Being and Time to demonstrate their affinity. In the third section, relying on Hans Jonas’ description of metabolism, I draw an analogy between the relation between organism and matter and the one between problem and givenness to substantiate the thesis that problematicity is not a philosophical dead end, but the constitutive feature of life and life-world.

Key words
Givenness, intuition, problem, horizon, Husserl, Heidegger, fulfillment, possibility, impossibility.

References

• Bernet, R., Kern, I., & Marbach, E. (1996). Edmund Husserl. Darstellung seines Denkens. Hamburg: Meiner.
• Borisov, E. (1998). Fenomenologicheskii metod Khaideggera [Heidegger’s Phenomenological Method]. In M. Khaidegger, Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiya vremeni [Prolegomena to History of the Concept of Time] (345-375). Tomsk: Vodolei. (in Russian).
• Chernavin, G. (2013a). Teleologia soglasovannosti opyta v fenomenologii Gusserlya [The Teleology of Concordant Experience in Husserl’s Phenomenology]. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2(1), 28-47. (in Russian).
• Chernavin, G. (2013b). Erscheinung in der Schwebe zwischen Sein und Schein: von Herbart zu Husserl. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2(2), 7-16.
• Chernavin, G. (2018). Neponyatnost samo soboi razumeiushegosya [The Oddity of the Taken for Granted]. St Petersburg, Moscow: Dobrosvet. (in Russian).
• Chernyakov, A. (2001). Ontologiya vremeni. Bytie i vremya v filosofii Aristotelya, Gusserlya i Khaideggera [Ontology of Time. Being and Time in Philosophy of Aristotle, Husserl and Heidegger]. St Petersburg: Vysshaja religiosno-filosofskaja shkola. (in Russian).
• Gusserl’, E. (2004). Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transcendentalnaja fenomenoogija. Vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuiu filosofiiu [The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. The General Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy]. Moscow: Vladimir Dal. (in Russian).
• Gusserl’, E. (2009). Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kniga pervaja [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Book I]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
• Gusserl’, E. (2010). Karteziansie Meditatsii [Cartesian Meditations]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
• Gusserl’, E. (2011). Issledovanija po fenomenologii i teorii poznanija [Investigations in Phenomenology and Theory of Knowledge]. In Logicheskie issledovanija [Logical Investigations]. Moscow: Akadenicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
• Gusserl’, E. (2018). Ideja fenomenologii. Pjat lekcii [The Idea of Phenomenoogy. Five Lectures]. St Petersburg: Gumanitarnaja Akademija. (in Russian).
• Heidegger, M. (1999). Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
• Heidegger, M. (2001). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
• Husserl, E. (1966). Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918-1926. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1973). Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1976a). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1976b). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Algemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Bd.II. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (2002). Zur phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass. 1926-1935. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Husserl, E. (2008). Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916-1937). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Kant, I. (2006). Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh. Tom 2. Chast 1. Kritika chistogo razuma [Works in German and Russian. Volume 2. Part 1. Critique of Pure Reason]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
• Khaidegger, M. (1997). Bytie i vremya [Being and Time]. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (in Russian).
• Khaidegger, M. (1998). Prolegomeny k istorii ponatija vremeni [Prolegomena to History of the Concept of Time]. Tomsk: Vodolei. (in Russian).
• Khaidegger, M. (2001). Osnovnye problemy fenomenologii [The Basic Problems of Phenomenology]. St Petersburg: Vysshaja religiosno-filosofskaja shkola. (in Russian).
• Khel’d, K. (2008). Khaidegger i printsip fenomenologii [Heidegger and the Principle of Phenomenology]. In Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii [Annual for Phenomenological Philosophy] (190-220). Moscow: RGGU. (in Russian).
• Khel’d, K. (2010). Problema Boga v fenomenologii Edmunda Gusserlya [God in Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology]. In Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii [Annual for Phenomenological Philosophy] (15-30). Moscow: RGGU. (in Russian).
• Marion, J-L. (2014). Nashyshennyi fenomen [Saturated Phenomenon]. In A. Yampolskaya & S. Sholokhova (Eds.), Postfenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii I za ee predelami [Postphenomenology: New Phenomenology in France and Beyond] (63-99). Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
• Mensch, J. (2017). Life and the Reduction to the Life-World. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 6(2), 13-29.
• Tengeli, L. (2013). Neobkhodimost fakticheskogo u Aristotelya i Gusserlya: dva osnovopolozheniya metafisiki [Necessity of a Fact in Aristotle and Husserl: Two Foundations of Metaphysics]. Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii [Annual for Phenomenological Philosophy] (190-208). Moscow: RGGU. (in Russian).
• Tengelyi, L. (2007). Erfahrung und Audruck. Phänomenologie im Umbruch bei Husserl und seinen Nachfolgern. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Tengelyi, L. (2014). Welt und Unendlichkeit. Zum Problem phänomenologischer Metaphysik. Alber: Freiburg-München.
• Yampolskaya, A. (2018). Iskusstvo fenomenologii [The Art of Phenomenology]. Moscow: RIPOL klassik. (in Russian).