Article/Publication Details
Views: 2944

RENAUD BARBARAS AND THE MULTIPLE MEANING OF “LIFE”

Abstract
The recent philosophy of Renaud Barbaras counts among the most original contributions to the phenomenology of life. My article examines it in the light of some conceptual observations based on the works of Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. The early phenomenological texts illustrate the complexity of the phenomenological approach to the living inasmuch as “life” can be said in different ways, it is plural in meaning; further, life is also plural in that it can be attributed to a plurality of beings (consciousness, organisms, certain forms of existence, etc.). When developing his own account, Barbaras starts from a profound analysis of the phenomenological idea of correlation and comes to a new notion of life which is no longer attributed to organisms but to the world. The article critically follows this move from the life of organisms to the life of the world and articulates certain questions that this move can raise. The background of these questions is the double plurality of the notion of life. Even though saying that “life” has multiple meanings and attributions is purely formal and general, this multiplicity can serve as a ground for the phenomenological analysis of the way life is indeed experienced in its different meanings.

Key words
Phenomenology, life, organism, consciousness, biology, embodiment, Barbaras.

References

• Barbaras, R. (1999). Le désir et la distance. Introduction à une phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Vrin, 1999.
• Barbaras, R. (2005). Desire and Distance. Introduction to a Phenomenology of perception. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Barbaras, R. (2008). Introduction à une phénoménologie de la vie. Paris: Vrin.
• Barbaras, R. (2011a). La vie lacunaire. Paris: Vrin.
• Barbaras, R. (2011b). L’ouverture du monde. Lecture de Jan Patočka. Chatou: Les Etitions de la Transparence.
• Barbaras, R. (2013). Dynamique de la manifestation. Paris: Vrin.
• Barbaras, R. (2016). Métaphysique du sentiment. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.
• Barbaras, R. (2018). La tautologie de la vie. Études phénoménologiques — Phenomenological Studies, 2, 1–19.
• Bimbenet, E. (2011). L’animal que je ne suis plus. Paris: Gallimard.
• Derrida, J. (1987). De l’esprit: Heidegger et la question. Paris: Galillé.
• Derrida, J. (2008). The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.
• Duicu, D. (2014). Phénoménologie du mouvement. Patočka et l’héritage de la physique aristotélicienne. Paris: Hermann.
• Fink, E. (1957). Zur ontologischen Frühgeschichte von Raum — Zeit — Bewegung. The Hague: Nijhoff.
• Fink, E. (1958). Sein, Wahrheit, Welt: Vor-Fragen zum Problem des Phänomen-Begriffs. The Hague: Nijhoff.
• Fink, E. (1976). Nähe und Distanz: Phänomenologische Vorträge und Aufsätze. Freiburg im Breisgau: Alber.
• Heidegger, M. (1993). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
• Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time. Albany, NY: SUNY.
• Heidegger, M. (2003). Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Stuttgart: Reclam.
• Heidegger, M. (2004). Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt-Endlichkeit-Einsamkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
• Husserl, E. (1985). Erfahrung und Urteil. Hamburg: Meiner.
• Husserl, E. (1992). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Gesammelte Schriften, 5. Hamburg: Meiner.
• Jonas, H. (2001). The Phenomenon of Life: Toward Philosophical Biology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1967). The Structure of Behavior. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2014). Phenomenology of Perception. London, New York: Routledge.
• Patočka, J. (1964). O filosofickém významu Aristotelova pojetí pohybu a historických výzkumů věnovaných jeho vývoji [On the Philosophical Meaning of Aristotle’s Concept of Motion and of Historical Investigations Dedicated to its Developement]. In Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philosophica et Historica, 1, 87–96. (in Czech).
• Patočka, J. (1972). Weltganzes und Menschenwelt: Bemerkungen zu einem zeitgenössischen kosmologischen Ansatz. In W. Beierwaltes & W. Schrader (Eds.), Weltaspekte der Philosophie. Festschrift für R. Berlinger, 243–50. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
• Patočka, J. (1998). Body, Community, Language, World. Chicago, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.
• Portman, A. (1995). Der Mensch — Ein Mängelwesen? In H. Keupp (Ed.), Lust an der Erkenntnis: Der Mensch als soziales Wesen, (92–100). Munich and Zurich: Piper.
• Scheler, M. (1998). Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. Bonn: Bouvier.