Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 3095


THE TELEOLOGICAL THINKING IN NICOLAI HARTMANN. A CONVERSATION BETWEEN HARTMANN’S THEORY OF THE FINAL CAUSALITY OF NATURE AND KANT’S VIEWS ON TELEOLOGY

Title in the language of publication: DAS TELEOLOGISCHE DENKEN BEI NICOLAI HARTMANN. EINE AUSEINANDERSETZUNG ZWISCHEN HARTMANNS THEORIE DER FINALITÄT DER NATUR UND KANTS AUFFASSUNG DER TELEOLOGIE
Author: ANDREA SCANZIANI
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 8, №1 (2019),  140-159
Language: German
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-1-140-159 PDF (Downloads: 2654)

Abstract
The work aims at presenting an interpretation of Nicolai Hartmann’s investigation of teleology, which would make possible a confrontation with Kant’s critical philosophy and teleological thought. Kant’s influence on the theoretical position assumed by Hartmann regarding the problem of finality is elucidated in the article. Kant’s influence on Hartmann will be explained in two steps: by considering the definition of purposiveness as a heuristic principle and by analyzing Hartmann’s approach to the problem of human freedom. Then Hartmann’s analysis of the categories is addressed, the philosopher’s exposition of the origin of the final nexus in the structure of consciousness being fundamental for his entire interpretation of the problem of teleology. By means of that, the faculty of consciousness to set for itself a purpose and its temporality as the origin of this faculty are analyzed. Hence, the question about the categorical claim of finality turns into the problem concerning its position with respect to the level of Being as exposed by Hartmann. Following that, the case of the organic is investigated, where the question of teleology is crucially at stake. Even though finality and purposiveness are necessarily given as related to a consciousness, this latter cannot represent something dominating the world and the organic. That excludes the possibility of finality in the organic—at least in this form. Considering Kant’s influence on defining the heuristic principle and causality of human freedom, monism in the determinations of reality is excluded in principle, while the position and possibility of finality in nature are newly defined.

Key words
Hartmann, Kant, Teleological Thinking, Teleology, Finality, Heuristic Principle, Freedom, Monism.

References

  • Ballauff, T. (1952). Nicolai Hartmanns Philosophie der Natur. Philosophia Naturalis, 2.
  • Baumann, W. (1955). Das Problem der Finalität im Organischen bei Nicolai Hartmann. Meinenheim am Glan: Hain.
  • Brentari, C. (2016). ʻThe Role of the Missing Reasonʼ: The Search for a Statum-Specific Form of Derermination. In von K. Peterson & R. Poli, Nicolai Hatmann’s Theory of Life, New Research on the Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann (65-80). Boston: de Gruyter.
  • Crummenerl, C. G. (2013). Kategorialanalyse und Wissenschaft. Ontologische Grundbestimmungen Nicolai Hartmanns in der Perspektive seiner Naturphilosophie und Schichtentheorie. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms Verlag.
  • Ehrl, G. (2003). Nicolai Hartmanns Philosophische Anthropologie in systematischer Perspective. Prima Philosophia, 8, 7-76.
  • Feyerabend, P. (1963). Professor Hartmann’s Philosophy of Nature. Ratio, 5, 81-94.
  • Hartmann, N. (1912). Philosophische Grundfragen der Biologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  • Hartmann, N. (1935). Ethik. Zweite Auflage. Berlin, Leipzig: de Gruyter.
  • Hartmann, N. (1940). Der Aufbau der realen Welt. Grundriss der allgemeinen Kategorienlehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Hartmann, N. (1943). Neue Wege der Ontologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
  • Hartmann, N. (1948a). Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain Verlag.
  • Hartmann, N. (1948b). Ziele und Wege der Kategorialanalyse. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 2 (4).
  • Hartmann, N. (1950). Philosophie der Natur. Abriss der speziellen Kategorienlehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Hartmann, N. (1951). Teleologisches Denken. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Hartmann, N. (1957). Diesseits von Idealismus und Realismus. In Kleinere Schriften, Band II. Abhandlungen zur Philosophie-Geschichte. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Kant, I. (1900). Akademieausgabe von Immanuel Kants Gesammelten Werken. Berlin: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
  • Kessel, T. (2012). Der Organismus als Individuum. In von G. Hartung, C. Strube, & M. Wunsch (Eds.), Von der Systemphilosophie zur systematischen Philosophie — Nicolai Hartmann (219-238). Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.
  • Peterson, K. (2012). Nicolai Hartmann’s Philosophy of Nature. Scripta Philosophiӕ Naturalis, 2, 143-179.
  • Toepfer, G. (2004). Zweckbegriff und Organismus. Über die teleologische Beurteilung biologischer Systeme. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.