Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 2865


CHAD ENGELLAND
“HEIDEGGER’S SHADOW. KANT, HUSSERL, AND THE TRANSCENDENTAL TURN”
Routledge, 2017. ISBN 9781138181878

Title in the language of publication: CHAD ENGELLAND
“HEIDEGGER’S SHADOW. KANT, HUSSERL, AND THE TRANSCENDENTAL TURN”
Routledge, 2017. ISBN 9781138181878
Author: Paul Slama
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 7, №1 (2018),  234-239
Language: English
Document type: Review
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2018-7-1-234-239 PDF (Downloads: 2679)

Abstract
This review presents historical and philosophical hypotheses of Chad Engelland's book by first considering the general thesis of a Heidegger transcendental philosopher, then emphasizing the importance of this theme for the treatise Sein und Zeit (1927), finally considering promises and aporia of such an interpretation for the second Heidegger. Heidegger first endorsed the program of a certain transcendental philosophy, to reject it in a second part of his work. Each time, the problem is to know what type of transcendental philosophy it is, which implies asking the question of Heidegger's relation to both transcendental philosophy of Kant and transcendental phenomenology of Husserl. Does the thought of utensility or authenticity in Being and Time refer to a transcendental questioning? And is it a Kantian or Husserlian transcendental? But also, can the thought of Ereignis and of the last God be so, as C. Engelland thinks? The reviewer insists on the importance of understanding the role of intuition in phenomenology’s relationship to Kant, but also on the link made by Heidegger between Kant's first and second Critiques, that is, between the theory and practice. Finally, it shows from the book the role of affectivity, not without indicating possible extensions including the analysis of neokantism, or Hölderlin.

Key words
Heidegger, Husserl, Kant, phenomenology, transcendental philosophy, transcendental phenomenology.

References

  • Cohen, H. (1907). Kommentar zu Immanuel Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Leipzig: Durr.
  • Cohen, H. (1885). Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Berlin: Ferd. Dümmlers Verlagsbuchhanlung.
  • Engelland, C. (2017) Heidegger’s Shadow. Kant, Husserl, and the Transcendental Turn. London: Routlege.
  • Heidegger, M. (1977). Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (1984). Die Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (1989). Beiträge zur Philosophie (vom Ereignis). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (1991). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (1997). Besinnung. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2006). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch (Hua III/1-2). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.