Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 2955


THE MATERIAL RESIDUE.
KANT AND HUSSERL ON AN ASPECT OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL FOUNDATION OF THE SCIENCE OF NATURE

Title in the language of publication: THE MATERIAL RESIDUE.
KANT AND HUSSERL ON AN ASPECT OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL FOUNDATION OF THE SCIENCE OF NATURE
Author: Francesco Pisano
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 7, №1 (2018),  98-120
Language: English
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2018-7-1-98-120 PDF (Downloads: 2773)

Abstract
Husserl’s late claim of that transcendental logic is self-founded stands in a puzzling relation with the facticity of nature. This relation concerns issues such as the traceableness of a “living present” in the immanence of living consciousness. The article considers this matter through a specific perspective, gained by reference to the project of a transcendental foundation of the science of nature. This project requires the problematic possibility of a formal determination of facticity. One could characterize the phenomenological finding of a “living present” as Husserl’s attempt to resolve the discrepancy between fact and form in a “living being” which consists of both actual materiality and transcendental ideality. This conciliatory solution remains questionable, given the impossibility to provide an a priori foundation of this synthetic moment through the self-reflexive movement of transcendental logic. However, the systematic project of transcendental phenomenology as such entails the question concerning the a priori foundation of our ordinary knowledge of facts. It seems, then, to require a solution of this sort. The problem of grounding the scientific knowledge of natural facts dates back at least to Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. So does the need for the definition of an empirical moment of this grounding. A discussion of Kant’s Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft presents an aporetic facet of the way in which transcendental philosophy responds to this need. An analogous impasse occurs in Husserl’s mature work. The concept of “living present” holds a central role in defining Husserl’s stance towards this stalemate. The analysis of this role aims to clarify both Husserl’s specific position in the broader context of transcendental philosophy, and an aspect of the transcendental foundation of the science of nature. I conclude that this foundation must encompass a factual, non-formalizable element: a material residue, required in order to complete its reflexive movement.

Key words
Phenomenology, transcendental philosophy, philosophy of science, science of nature, a priori, living present, Kant, Husserl.

References

  • Aristotle. (1831). Aristoteles Graece ex recognitione Immanuelis Bekkeri. Volumen prius. Berlin: Berolini.
  • Benjamin, W. (1985). Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. VI. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Bunge, M. (1967). Foundations of Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Derrida, J. (1993). La Voix et le Phénomène : Introduction au problème du signe dans la phénoménologie de Husserl. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Falcon, A. (2005). Unity without Uniformity: Aristotle and the Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heelan, P. A. (1987). Husserl’s Later Philosophy of Natural Science. Philosophy of Science, 54 (3), 368-390.
  • Held, K. (1966). Lebendige Gegenwart. Die Frage nach der Seinsweise des Transzendentalen Ich bei Edmund Husserl, Entwickelt am Leitfaden der Zeitproblematik. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Hintikka, J. (1992). Kant on the Mathematical Method. In C. J. Posy (Ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Modern Essays (21-42). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Husserl, E. (1954). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1969). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893-1917) (Hua X). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  • Husserl, E. (1973). Cartesianische Meditationen (Hua I). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1974). Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft (Hua XVII). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie (Hua III/1). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. Erster Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. In zwei Bänden (Hua XIX/1). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (2001). Die „Bernauer Manuskripte“ über das Zeitbewußtsein (1917/18) (Hua XXXIII). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Kant, I. (1781). Сritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.
  • Kant, I. (1902). Vorkritische Schriften I: 1747–1756. Berlin: Reimer.
  • Kant, I. (1904). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin: Reimer.
  • Kant, I. (1911). Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1. Aufl. 1781), Prolegomena, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Berlin: Reimer.
  • Kant, I. (1936). Opus Postumum. Erste Hälfte. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Kant, I. (1938). Opus postumum. Zweite Hälfte. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Kant, I. (1942). Bemerkungen zu den Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen, Rostocker Kantnachlass, Preisschrift über die Fortschritte der Metaphysik. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Kant, I. (2004). Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kern, I. (1964). Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung über Husserls Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
  • Paci, E. (1961). Tempo e verità nella fenomenologia di Husserl [Time and Truth in Husserl’s Phanomenology]. Roma, Bari: Laterza. (in Italian).
  • Pecere, P. (2009). La filosofia della natura in Kant [Kant’s Philosophy of Nature]. Bari: Edizioni di Pagina. (in Italian).
  • Ryckman, T. (2005). The Reign of Relativity: Philosophy in Physics 1915-1925. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Tengelyi, L. (2005). Experience and Infinity in Kant and Husserl. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 67 (3), 479-500.
  • Toraldo di Francia, G. (1981). The Investigation of the Physical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.