Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 3101


TRANSCENDENTALISM AND NATURALISM: A REREADING OF KANT AND HUSSERL

Title in the language of publication: LE TRANSCENDANTAL ET LE NATURALISME: UNE RELECTURE DE KANT ET HUSSERL
Author: Jean-Daniel Thumster
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 7, №1 (2018),  79-97
Language: French
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2018-7-1-79-97 PDF (Downloads: 3158)

Abstract
This paper aims to highlight the fact that Kantian philosophy and phenomenology do not only tend to disclose the structures of a priori knowledge. Contrariwise, we suggest that the transcendental may also be understood by a detour towards the empirical. Our first example concerns Kant as he developed a certain prefiguration of the phenomenological considerations and described a way to consider the subject in a naturalistic way by introducing the notion of Selbstsetzung in his latest work. By comparing the way Kant and Husserl thought the need to consider that the subject is embodied in the world, we also point out that Husserl improved the Kantian problematic of the Selbstsetzung as he described a transcendental and scientific method to apprehend the life of the subject. Nevertheless, this method may also be defined as a “phenomenological naturalism” in so far as the questions Husserl brings to light can be seen as the seeds of the current attempt to naturalize phenomenology. In this context, we aim to demonstrate that Kant’s first comprehension of the Selbstsetzung prefigures the development of the phenomenological turning point from a static to a genetic method. Furthermore, this genetic method may be conceived as an original form of naturalism which is able to illuminate the current cognitive sciences by focusing on the first-person perspective and on crucial themes like the flesh, consciousness, etc. Eventually, we conclude that this turning point may have been an inspiration for the naturalization of phenomenology.

Key words
Phenomenology, naturalism, Kant, Husserl, transcendental, practical philosophy, epistemology.

References

  • Barbaras, R. (2008). Introduction à une phénoménologie de la vie. Paris: Vrin.
  • Benoist, J. (1994). Autour de Husserl : l’ego et la raison. Paris: Vrin.
  • Berger, G. (1941). Le cogito dans la philosophie de Husserl. Paris: Aubier Éditions Montaigne.
  • Berthoz, A., & Petit, J-L. (2006). Physiologie de l’action et phénoménologie. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  • Cobb-Stevens, R. (1998). Husserl et la philosophie analytique. Paris: Vrin.
  • Depraz, N. (1995). Transcendance et incarnation. Le statut de l’intersubjectivité comme altérité à soi chez Husserl. Paris: Vrin.
  • Depraz, N. (2015). Première, deuxième, troisième personne. Bucarest: Zeta Books.
  • Foessel, M. (2015). Kant et l’équivoque du monde. Paris: CNRS.
  • Husserl, E. (1947). Méditations cartésiennes. Paris: Vrin.
  • Husserl, E. (1968). Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925 (Hua IX). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Husserl, E. (1994). Briefwechsel, Band V: Die Neukantianer. The Hague: Kluwer.
  • Husserl, E. (2001). Natur und Geist: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1927 (Hua XXXII). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Husserl, E. (2008). Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916-1937). New York: Springer.
  • Kant, E. (1986). Opus postumum. Paris: PUF.
  • Kant, E. (1993). Anthropologie d’un point de vue empirique. Paris: GF.
  • Kant, E. (2006). Critique de la raison pure. Paris: GF.
  • Kant, E. (2012). Prolégomènes à toute métaphysique future. Paris: Vrin.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). La Nature, Cours du Collège de France. Paris: Seuil.
  • Patočka, J. (2016). Le monde naturel comme problème philosophique. Paris: Vrin.
  • Petit, J-L. (2015). De la neurodégénérescence motrice comme limitation interne du « pouvoir-faire ». In J. Rogozinki (Ed.), Les cahiers Philosophiques De Strasbourg. La naturalisation de la phénoménologie 20 ans après. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.
  • Philonenko, A. (1969). L’oeuvre de Kant. Tome I. La philosophie pré-critique et La Critique de la Raison Pure. Paris: Vrin.
  • Searle, J. (1995). La redécouverte de l’esprit. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Thumser, J-D. (2017). Entretien avec Natalie Depraz : Autour de la cardiophénoménologie. Un Philosophe. Retreived from: https://unphilosophe.com/2017/10/09/entretien-avec-natalie-depraz-autour-de-la-cardiophenomenologie/