Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 3752


EDMUND HUSSERL
ABOUT THE HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE OF EXPERIENCE. THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION OF THE 8TH PARAGRAPH OF EDMUND HUSSERL’S BOOK “EXPERIENCE AND JUDGEMENT”

Title in the language of publication: ЭДМУНД ГУССЕРЛЬ
О ГОРИЗОНТНОЙ СТРУКТУРЕ ОПЫТА. ПРЕДИСЛОВИЕ К ПЕРЕВОДУ 8 ПАРАГРАФА КНИГИ ЭДМУНДА ГУССЕРЛЯ «ОПЫТ И СУЖДЕНИЕ»
Author: Alexander Frolov
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 6, №1 (2017), 181-191
Language: Russian
Document type: Preface to the Translation
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2017-6-1-181-191 PDF (Downloads: 3248)

Abstract
We present here a Russian translation of the 8th paragraph of Husserl’s book “Experience and Judgment” (1939). The paragraph includes a systematic outline of the phenomenological conception of horizonedness, while in no other Husserl’s book – from “Ideas I” to “Crisis” –we can find a fragment dealing with the idea of horizon elaborated so deep. The idea however is a substantial element of Husserl’s conceptualization of experience as an open, indefinite process. In the 7th paragraph of “Experience and Judgment” the world is conceived as a universal “ground of certainty”, upon which all our experience is based, and in the 8th paragraph the intentional structure of experience (mostly as perception) is explicated. That structure is characterized as horizontal. The crucial difference here is between the “inner horizon” and the “outer horizon” of an object. The outer horizon stretches finally into the “world-horizon” – the ultimate, universal horizon comprising all partial horizons and perspectives. In its turn, typization functions here as a way of representation of objects laying beyond the field of what is given. Typization also covers latent aspects of present objects and concerns even their patent aspects. The most general type, according to Husserl, is “object as such” – a basic category of formal ontology. The idea of horizon has been a fundamental principle of classical phenomenology. Nowadays it provokes hot discussions among such authors as Jean-Luc Marion, Emmanuel Levinas, and Jacques Derrida. The discussions relate to the very essence of phenomenology. That’s why we find publication of the fragment to be important.

Key words
Experience, world, horizon, inner horizon, outer horizon, anticipation, general typization of objects.

References

  • Cusanus, N. (1979). Ob uchenom neznanii [On Learned Ignorance]. In N. Cusanus, Sochineniya v 2 tomakh. T. 1 [Collected Works in 2 Vol. Vol. 1]. Мoscow: Thought.
  • Derrida, Zh., & Marion, Zh.-L. (2011). O dare [On the Gift]. Logos, 3,144–171. (in Russian).
  • Gusserl’, E. (2004). Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya [The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy]. Saint-Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’. (in Russian).
  • Husserl, E. (1939). Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Prag: Akademia Verlagsbuchhandlung.
  • Kant, I. (1964). Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason]. In I. Kant, Sobranie sochinenij v 6 tomakh. T. 6 [Collected Works in 6 Vol. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Thought. (in Russian).
  • Kuhn, H. (1940). The Phenomenological Concept of “Horizon”. In M. Farber (Ed.), Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl (106–123). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Lohmar, D. (1996). Zu der Entstehung und den Ausgangsmaterialien von Edmund Husserls Werk “Erfahrung und Urteil”. Husserl Studies, 1, 31–71.
  • Merlo-Ponti, M. (1999). Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya [Phenomenology of Perception]. Saint-Petersburg: Juventas, Science. (in Russian).
  • Marion, J.-L. (2014). Nasyshchenyj fenomen [The Saturated Phenomenon]. In S. Sholokhova & A. Yampol’skaya (Eds.), (Post) fenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za ee predelami [(Post)phenomenology: The New Phenomenology in France and Beyond]. Moscow: Akademical Project. (in Russian).
  • Ritter, J. (Ed). (1974). Horizont. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Bd. 3 (1187–1206). Stuttgart, Basel.
  • Shiyan, A.A. (2013). Vospriyatie i mir v “Opyte i suzhdenii” Emunda Gusserlya [Perception and the World in Edmund Husserl’s “Experience and Judgement”]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki. Religiovedenie [RSUH Bulletin. Series: Philosophy. Religious Studies], 11 (112), 51–59. (in Russian).
  • Shyuts, A. (2004). Razmyshleniya o probleme relevantnosti [Reflections on the Problem of Relevance]. In A. Shyuts, Izbrannoye. Mir, svetyashchiisya smyslom [Selected Texts. The World Shining with Meaning]. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia. (in Russian).