Studies in Phenomenology

Article/Publication Details
Views: 868


Title in the language of publication: HUSSERL, BAKHTIN, AND THE OTHER I.
Author: Carina Pape
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 5, №2 (2016),  271–289
Language: English
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.18199/2226-5260-2016-5-2-271–289 PDF (Downloads: 669)

Mikhail Bakhtin aimed to invent a phenomenology of the self-experience and of the experience of the other in his early work. In order to realize such a phenomenology he combined different approaches he called idealism and materialism / naturalism. The first one he linked to Edmund Husserl, but did hardly name him directly concerning his phenomenology. Does this intersubjective phenomenology give a hint that Bakhtin used Husserlian ideas more than considered yet? Or did they both invent similar ideas independently from each other? Both thinkers dealt with the issue of intersubjectivity. Husserl judged statements on other psycho-physical realities as metaphysics in the Logical Investigations II, but in his Ideas I he described the others as enhancing one’s experience through their “experiential surpluses”. In the same way Bakhtin described the unique perspective of the other as a mandatory and valuable part of the world of the act in his Philosophy of the Act and his investigations on Author and Hero. In order to understand the influence of Husserl’s phenomenology for Bakhtin’s early philosophy we need to take a look closer at those contentual parallels as well as some paraphrases yet unnoticed. This gives hint for the question if for Bakhtin Husserl was more than just a name dropped. In this article I reconstructed the relations between both thinkers and answered the question if the dating of Bakhtin’s early work until 1928 has to be re-considered.

Key words
Intersubjectivity, materialism, idealism, pluralism, life world, the other.


  • Adler, M. (1936). Das Rätsel der Gesellschaft. Zur erkenntnis-kritischen Grundlegung der Sozialwissenschaft. Wien: Saturn.
  • Bachtin, M. (1979). Die Ästhetik des Wortes. Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1993). Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Austin: Texas University Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1996). K filosofii postupka [Toward a Philosophy of the Act]. In Bakhtin, M. Sobranie sochinenii v semi tomakh. Tom 1. [Collected Works. SevenVolumes. Vol. 1]. Moscow: IMLI. (in Russian).
  • Bachtin, M. (2008). Autor und Held in der ästhetischen Tätigkeit. Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Bakhtin, M. (2010). Besedy s V. D. Duvakinym [Talks with V. D. Duvakin]. In V. L. Makhlin (Ed.), Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin (23–33). Moscow: ROSSPEN. (in Russian).
  • Bachtin, M. (2011). Zur Philosophie der Handlung. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.
  • Bernard-Donals, M. (2003). Mikhail Bakhtin. Between Phenomenology and Marxism. In M. Gardiner (Ed.), Mikhail Bakhtin (Vol. 1). London: SAGE.
  • Brandist, C. (2002). The Bakhtin Circle. Philosophy, Culture and Politics. London: Pluto.
  • Dennes, M. (2010). Vliyanie fenomenologii E. Gusserlya na rossiiskuyu nauku 1910–1920-kh godov [Husserl’s Phenomenology and its Impact on Russian Science in 1910–1920]. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya [Psychological Studies], 14 (6). Retrieved from (in Russian).
  • Emerson, C. (1997). The First Hundred Years of Mikhail Bakhtin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Erdinast-Vulcan, D. (2013). Between Philosophy and Literature. Bakhtin and the Question of the Subject. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Haardt, A. (1992). Husserl in Rußland. Phänomenologie der Sprache und Kunst bei Gustav Špet und Aleksej Losev. München: Fink.
  • Haardt, A. (2000). Michail Bachtin – ein Phänomenologe der Intersubjektivität? Phänomenologische Forschungen. Neue Folge, 5, 217-229.
  • Haardt, A. (2002). Drugoi i ego vizavi: Interpersonal’nye otnosheniya v literature i v mire zhizni u Bakhtina i Sartra [The Other and His vis-à-vis: Interpersonale Relations in Literature and Life World in Bakhtin’s and Sartre’s Works]. Proceedings of the Conference on Russian Philosophy in the Post Soviet Era (129-146). Bremen. (in Russian).
  • Husserl, E. (1901). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
  • Husserl, E. (1913). Logische Untersuchungen 1. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
  • Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass Erster Teil: 1905–1920 (Hua XIII). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Husserl, E. (1992a). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner.
  • Husserl, E. (1992b). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ergänzungsband. Texte aus dem Nachlass 1934–1937 (Hua XXIX). Den Haag: Kluwer.
  • Makhlin, V. (1995). Tretii Renessans [The Third Renaissance]. In K. G. Isupov (Ed.), Bakhtinologiya. Issledovaniya, perevody, publikatsii [Bakhtinology. Research, Translations, Publications] (132-154). St. Petersburg: Aleteiya. (in Russian).
  • Makhlin, V. (1997). Drugoi [The Other]. In N. D. Tamarchenko (Ed.), Bakhtinskii tezaurus. Materialy i issledovaniya [Bakhtin’s Glossary. Proceedings and Research] (141-148). Moscow: RGGU. (in Russian).
  • Möckel, C. (1998). Einführung in die transzendentale Phänomenologie. München: UTB.
  • Pape, C., & Kolkutina, V. (2013). Philosophie in Russland und in Deutschland. Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger, 66 (1), 41-77.
  • Pape, C. (2015). Autonome Teilhaftigkeit und teilhaftige Autonomie. Der Andere in Michail M. Bachtins Frühwerk. München: Fink.
  • Poole, B. (1997). Bakhtin and Cassirer: The Philosophical Origins of Bakhtin’s Carnival Messianism. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 97 (¾), 537-578.
  • Poole, B. (2001). From Phenomenology to Dialogue. Max Scheler’s Phenomenological Tradition and Mikhail Bakhtin’s Development from “Toward a Philosophy of the Act” to His Study of Dostoevsky. In K. Hirschkop (Ed.), Bakhtin and Cultural Theory (109-135). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Richter, J. P. F. (1974). Siebenkäs. Sämtliche Werke (Bd.1-2). München: Carl Hanser.
  • Sapienzia, F. (2004). Mikhail Bakhtin, Vyacheslav Ivanov and the Rhethorical Culture of the Russian Third Renaissance. Philosophy and Rhethoric, 37 (2), 123-142.
  • Sasse, S. (2010). Michail Bachtin zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.
  • Shchedrina, T. (2011). Die ethische Dimension der Erkenntnis in der russischen Philosophie: Nikolaj Berdjaev – Gustav Špet – Lev Šestov. In A. Haardt & N. Plotnikov (Eds.), Das normative Menschenbild in der russischen Philosophie (113-125). Münster: LIT.
  • Shchittsova, T. (2003). Das menschliche Ereignis in der Philosophie von M. Bachtin. In H. R. Sepp (Ed.), Essays in Celebration of the Founding of the Organization of Phenomenological Organizations. Retrieved from
  • Staiti, A. (2010). Phänomenologie. In H.-H. Gander (Ed.), Husserl-Lexikon (229-235). Darmstadt: WBG.
  • Theunissen, M. (1965). Der Andere. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Waldenfels, B. (2006). Grundmotive einer Phänomenologie des Fremden. Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.