Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 3523


H. VAIHINGER AND EARLY HUSSERL:
AN ATTEMPT OF A SOMEWHAT UNCOMMON COMPARISON

Title in the language of publication: Г. ФАЙХИНГЕР И РАННИЙ ГУССЕРЛЬ:
ОПЫТ НЕ ВПОЛНЕ ОБЫЧНОГО СОПОСТАВЛЕНИЯ
Author: Nelly Motroshilova
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 5, №2 (2016),  290–307
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.18199/2226-5260-2016-5-2-290–307 PDF (Downloads: 3335)

Abstract
This article is conceived as a rather unusual comparison of the two ways in philosophy, as well as of the same ideas of H. Vaihinger, on the one one hand, and of early E. Husserl, on the other hand – in the period, when they were the colleagues at Halle University to the end of XIX-th century. The analysis, given in this article, is concentrated on the special problems as follows: – the early “objective” juxtaposition to the end XIX-th century of the naturalism, positivism, pragmatism as represented by H. Vaihinger and of the anti-naturalistic orientation of early Husserl; – the H. Vaihinger’s “Die Philosophie des Als Ob” and some ideas of Husserl (“Logische Untersuchungen”) about so called “the laws of nature” as “idealized fictions”. Special attention in the work of H. Vaihinger also deserves his important historical and philosophical investigations. This is, for example, his comments to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. It must be said that the philosophy of H. Vaihinger still very poor explored, as well as the works of early Husserl. The author intends to shed light on this poorly explored subject.

Key words
Early Vaihinger, Vaihinger’s philosophy “als ob”, early “naturalism”, early “positivism”, early “pragmatism”, early Husserlian philosophy.

References

  • Ehrenfels, Ch. (1890). Über Gestaltqualitäten. Leipzig: Reisland.
  • Husserl, E. (1970). Philosophie der Arithmetik (Hua XII). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Laas, E. (1879–1884). Idealismus und Positivismus. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung. In Bd. 3. Berlin: Weidmann.
  • Max, E. (1886). Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Jena: Fischer.
  • Meyer, E. (1902). Zur Theorie und Methodik der Geschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
  • Motroshilova N.V. (2003). “Idei I” Edmunda Gusserlya kak vvedenie v fenomenologiyu [“Ideas I” Edmund Husserl as an Introduction to Phenomenology]. Moscow: Phenomenology-Hermeneutics.
  • Mühlpfordt, G., Schenk, G., Meyer, R., & Schwabe, H. (2001). Der Spirituskreis (1890-1958). Eine Gelehrtengesellschaft in neuhumanistischer Tradition. Vom Kaiserreich bis zum Verbot durch Walter Ulbricht im Rahmen der Verfolgungen an der Universität Halle 1957 und 1958. Halle: Hallescher.
  • Schiller, F. (1805). Theater von Schiller: Die Huldigung der Kunste. Don Karlos. Die Jungfrau von Orleans. Tübingen: Cotta.
  • Vaihinger, H. (1876). Hartmann, Dühring und Lange. Zur Geschichte der philosophie im 19. Jahrhundert. Ein kritischer Essay. Iserlohn: J. Baedeker.
  • Vaihinger, H. (1921). Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen. Leipzig: Meiner.