Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 4646


LIFEWORLD, CIVILISATION, SYSTEM:
PATOČKA AND HABERMAS ON EUROPE AND ITS CRISIS

Title in the language of publication: LIFEWORLD, CIVILISATION, SYSTEM:
PATOČKA AND HABERMAS ON EUROPE AND ITS CRISIS
Author: Francesco Tava
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 5, №1 (2016),  70-89
Language: English
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.18199/2226-5260-2016-5-1-70-89 PDF (Downloads: 3422)

Abstract
The aim of this article is to show how both Jan Patočka and Jürgen Habermas, starting from a reinterpretation of the idea of «lifeworld», engaged a critique of modern civilisation, aiming (with different outcomes) at a redefinition of the concept of political community. In order to achieve this goal, I firstly focus on Patočka’s understanding of modern rational civilisation and its attempt to fix the fracture between «life» and «world». At this stage, I take also advantage of Hans Blumenberg’s distinction between these two terms, in order to better clarify Patočka’s stance on this problem. Secondly, I analyse Habermas’ ideas of lifeworld and system, and their uncoupling in modern societies, as well as the reemergence of this issue in Habermas’ recent works on the European economic and political crisis. Finally, I focus on the very different ways in which Patočka and Habermas tackled the ideas of conflict and crisis in contemporary world, also in view of a possible path out of this crisis through a re-constitution of Europe.

Key words
Lifeworld, civilisation, communicative action, system, crisis, Europe, solidarity, community.

References

  • Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectics of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Árnason, J. P. (2003). Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden: BRILL.
  • Baxter, H. (2011). Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Blumenberg, H. (1986). Lebenszeit und Weltzeit. Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Caldicott, H. (Ed.). (2014). Crisis without End: The Medical and Ecological Consequences of the Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe. New York, NY: The New Press.
  • Flynn, J. (2014). System and Lifeworld in Habermas’ Theory of Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 40 (2), 205-214.
  • Gamble, A. (2014). Crisis without End? The Unravelling of Western Prosperity. Basingstoke, NY: Pelgrave Macmillan.
  • Gramsci, A. (1975). Quaderni dal carcere [Prison Notebooks]. Turin: Einaudi. (in Italian).
  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. II. Lifeworld and System. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Habermas, J. (2001). The Postnational Constellation and the Future of Democracy. In The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (58-112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Habermas, J. (2012). The Crisis of European Union: a Response. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
  • Heidegger, M. (1995). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Homolka, J. (2015). The Problem of Meaning in the Rational (Super)Civilisation: Patočka’s Interpretation of Modernity after World War II. In L. Učník, I. Chvatík, & A. Williams (Eds.), Asubjective Phenomenology: Jan Patočka’s Project in the Broader Context of His Work (167-186). Nordhausen: Traugott Bautz.
  • Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Jütten, T. (2011). The Colonization Thesis: Habermas on Reification. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19 (5), 701-727.
  • Kosík, K. (1976). Dialectics of the Concrete: A Study on Problems of Man and World. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Lukács, G. (1971). History and Class Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Meacham, D. (2016). Supercivilisation and Biologism. In D. Meacham, & F. Tava (Eds.), Thinking after Europe: Jan Patočka and Politics. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
  • Miettinen, T. (2016). Governing with Ideas: On the Phenomenological Roots of the Ordoliberal Tradition. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy. (Forthcoming).
  • Mill, J. S. (2004). On the Definition of Political Economy, and on the Method of Investigation Proper to It. In Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, 222-300. Retrieved from: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12004
  • Patočka, J. (1988). Europa und Nach-Europa. Die nacheuropäische Epoche und ihre geistigen Probleme. In K. Nellen, & J. Němec (Eds.), Ketzerische Essais zur Philosophie der Geschichte und ergänzende Schriften (207-287). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
  • Patočka, J. (1989a). Edmund Husserl’s Philosophy of the Crisis of the Sciences and His Conception of a Phenomenology of the “Life-World”. In E. Kohák (Ed.), Jan Patočka: Philosophy and Selected Writings (223-238). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Patočka, J. (1989b). The “Natural” World and Phenomenology. In E. Kohák (Ed.), Jan Patočka: Philosophy and Selected Writings (239-272). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Patočka, J. (1994). Die Selbstbesinnung Europas. Perspektiven der Philosophie, 20, 241-274.
  • Patočka, J. (1996a). Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
  • Patočka, J. (1996b). Nadcivilizace a její vnitrní konflikt [The Supercivilization and Its Inner Conflict]. In Péče o duši I. Sebrané spisy: Vol. 1 (243-302) [Care for the Soul I. Selected Works]. Prague: Oikoymenh. (in Czech).
  • Patočka, J. (2002). Kacířské eseje o filosofii dějin [Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History]. In Péče o duši III. Sebrané spisy: Vol. 3 (13-144) [Care for the Soul III. Selected Works]. Prague: Oikoymenh. (in Czech).
  • Patočka, J. (2008). Přirozený svět jako filosofický problém [The Natural World as a Philosophical Problem]. In Fenomenologické spisy I. Sebrané spisy: Vol. 6 (127-261) [Phenomenological Writings I. Selected Works]. Prague: Oikoymenh. (in Czech).
  • Schütz, A., & Luckmann T. (1973). The Structures of the Lifeworld. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Srubar, J. (2002). Jan Patočka: Phenomenology of Practice. In J. J. Drummond, & L. Embree (Eds.), Phenomenological Approaches to Moral Philosophy: A Handbook (311-325). Dondrecht: Kluwer.
  • Tava, F. (2016). The Brave Struggle: Jan Patočka on Europe’s Past and Future. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 47 (3).
  • Verovšek, P. J. (2012). Meeting Principles and Lifeworlds Halfway: Jürgen Habermas on the Future of Europe. Political Studies, 60 (2), 363-380.
  • Vetter, H. (2003). Lebenswelten: Ludwig Landgrebe Eugen Fink Jan Patočka. Frankfurt a. Main: P. Lang.
  • Weber, M. (2012). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wirts, A. M. (2014). A Defense of the Lifeworld: The Source of Normativity in a Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 40 (2), 215-223.